Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:45:58.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time to Rectify the Neglect? Audit on Prescription Writing the Neglected skill. Audit Ref No: AU/006/01/2021

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2022

Amit Fulmali*
Affiliation:
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
Sara Sheik
Affiliation:
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
Amir-Humza Suleman
Affiliation:
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
Faryal Rana
Affiliation:
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
Ruth Bloxam
Affiliation:
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
Lubna Abdallah
Affiliation:
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
Ranjit Mahanta
Affiliation:
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Prescribing is a neglected skill amongst trainees. Prescription errors can harm patients. A recent Economic analysis published in BMJ Quality & Safety. Estimated that 237 million medication errors occur in England annually. Costing the NHS £98,462,582. Prescribing errors contributed to 21% of the total errors. It is important that all prescribers are aware of principles of safe prescribing. Our aim is to is to establish whether our practice is meeting standards of prescription writing in old age psychiatry ward setup.

Methods

We used prescription standards set by BMA, BNF and SABP (Surrey and Borders Partnership Foundation NHS Trust) to assess all prescriptions. The following parameters were checked: GMC number, Sign, Name of Doctor, Name of drug, Indication, Dose, Route, Frequency, Original start date, current Date, medication timings.

Data collection and handling

We performed a closed loop audit. A retrospective data of 228 prescriptions were collected from August 2020 to January 2021 from patients admitted in Victoria Ward. The data were analysed and presented at departmental meeting. Re-training on prescription writing conducted. New data was prospectively collected comprising of 230 prescriptions from March 2021 to June 2021 to complete the audit cycle.

Excel sheet was used to collect the data and to get the results. All Prescription charts were collected from SystmOne (clinical software system). Data from both the Audit's were analysed and compared.

Results

We found errors in all parameters, except for medication timings. Comparison of the data from the first audit and re-audit showed an increase in prescription errors.

There was an increased 20.33% error in writing GMC number, 16.87% error in writing name of the doctor, 12.94% error in indication and 5% error in original start date. There was improvement of 10.88% in one parameter, “Name of the drug”.

Conclusion

A significant error was found in writing the GMC number and the Doctor's name, despite regular training during induction. There are no clear guidelines on the writing of GMC registration being compulsory on Drug chart. With one exception if online and you are not the patient's regular prescriber, then your GMC registration number is required.

Recommendations

  1. 1. We recommended the trust to issue stamps with GMC number and doctor's name.

  2. 2. Re-audit in 6 months’ time after introduction of the stamps.

  3. 3. Quarterly regular training of new Trainee doctors.

Service improvements

After the Audit was submitted locally, stamps were introduced and issued to junior doctors at Victoria Ward by the Trust.

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.