Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:20:54.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A review of serious untoward incidents (SUIS) of patients with personality disorder (PD)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Harry Reid*
Affiliation:
East London NHS Foundation Trust
Tennyson Lee
Affiliation:
Centre for Understanding Personality Disorder (CUSP), Deancross Personality Disorder Service, ELFT NHS Foundation Trust
Charlotte James
Affiliation:
East London NHS Trust
William Hancox
Affiliation:
North East London Foundation Trust
Stefanos Stoikos
Affiliation:
North Kensigton and Chelsea CMHT, Central and Nort West London NHS Foundation Trust, and Centre for Understanding Personality Disorder (CUSP), Deancross Personality Disorder Service, ELFT NHS Foundation Trust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The aim of this paper is to describe key findings and recommendations of SUI reports regarding patients with a diagnosis of PD in East London NHS Foundation Trust (ELFT). Patients with a diagnosis of PD are often involved in SUIs with regards to risk to themselves or others. Contributing factors might be the nature of their disorder in terms of mood instability and impulsivity, self-harming or antisocial behaviour, and the difficulties posed to assessing clinicians in predicting risk.

Background

Patients with PD present severe challenges to services. SUI findings thus serve as a lightning rod for issues in their management. With the emergence of NICE guidelines for borderline PD [2009] and antisocial PD [2009] regarding risk assessments, there has been greater optimism for management of PDs.

Method

A case series of 50 SUI reports of patients with a diagnosis of PD were identified from the governance and risk management team of ELFT. Themes were categorized as positive practice, contributory factors, and recommendations. Findings are related to guidelines in NICE and RCPsychiatry. Any patient with a diagnosis of PD (of any sub-type) that was involved in a SUI in ELFT met the inclusion criteria. There were no exclusion criteria.

Result

The most frequent themes in positive practice were ‘continuity of care’ and ‘clinical practice’. The most frequent subthemes in clinical practice were ‘assessments’ and ‘follow-up’. ‘Continuity of care’ included examples of collaborative working between various teams, as in joint assessments, good communication, and timely referrals. In contributory factors ‘poor documentation’ was the most frequent theme. 14 reports found no contributory factors. In recommendations the most frequent theme was the need for development and implementation of PD policies and for improved risk management.

Conclusion

NICE guidelines stress the importance of continuity of care and good clinical care and it is commendable that these were findings in positive practice. The importance of documentation being accurate and timely needs underlining in hard pressed time poor clinicians. Services would do well to review PD policies specifically regarding risk management at a wider Trust and local service level. Our findings point to the ongoing need for workforce development as recommended in the RCPSych position statement on PD published in January 2020.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.