Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:18:03.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recruitment and Retention Survey – What Did Speciality Trainees (STs) Say?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Sajid Mahmood*
Affiliation:
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
Girish Kunigiri
Affiliation:
Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Lincoln, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Recruitment and retention of medical staff is a national issue. Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust (LPT) has significant challenge like many other neighbouring Trusts in this regard. Low level of staff means challenges in provision of adequate and efficient patientcare. There is a lack of flexibility for clinicians to get time for Supported Programmed Activity (SPA). Burn out of existing clinicians and loosing good will is common which increases patients’ complaint and potential risk of near misses and serious incidents. Despite the East Midland being one of the popular deaneries among STs, retention of locally trained STs post CCT remained a challenge. Thus, the aim of this study was to find out proportion of speciality trainees (STs) doctors satisfied with current job and to explore their views on current difficulties and ways to retain and support them post CCT in career progression within the training Trust.

Methods

It was a cross-sectional survey. The target population was STs working in the East Midland deanery. An online questionnaire was developed for data collection. Data were gathered through open (free text) and close (options provided) questions. Information was collected regarding job satisfaction, positive and negative of job, difficulties and challenges in current role, willingness to continue post CCT within Trust and if they would recommend friends or colleagues to join LPT. Results are reported in percentages for descriptive statistics.

Results

About 59% of the STs were satisfied with their current training. Key positive of jobs include helpful colleagues, good trainers and supervision, autonomy, flexibility, good on-call rota pattern, work life balance, and protected time for teaching. Interest is shown for various SPA activities (teaching, audit, QI project, research, leadership and management). However, wide variety of challenges being also reported at individual, team and organisational level.

Over 70% of the participants shown interest to work for LPT post CCT but requested for additional support in term of flexibility of job description and role whereas remaining 30% reported to move into private sector due to better pay and work life balance. Surprisingly only 23.5% clearly stated, they would recommend a friend or a colleague to join LPT.

Conclusion

Majority of STs doctors were satisfied and willing to continue working post CCT in LPT. However, reported challenges need prompt response and early discussion and planning with STs in term of what local Trust can offer and support would ensure their retention and enhance recruitment while they are being advocate for the LPT.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.