Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:38:28.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Quality Improvement Project to Increase Junior Doctors’ Satisfaction With Handover Process Using Microsoft Teams (MS Teams) as a Platform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Aradhana Gupta*
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
Amitav Narula
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
Devika Patel
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
Mohamad Arifin
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
Helen Wheeldon
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
Ayomide Ajayi
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
Gagandeep Sachdeva
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
Nay Aung
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To improve junior doctors’ satisfaction with handover process to >70% over a period of 10 weeks.

Methods

Baseline level of overall satisfaction with current handover practice was measured through a survey using Likert scale. Using the same scale, the team also looked at:

  1. 1. Degree of confidence in tasks being completed

  2. 2. Degree of confidence in handover being confidential

  3. 3. Degree of confidence in handover being sufficient for medico-legal purposes

Part of the survey also asked junior doctors using free text comments on how handover is currently carried out between shifts. The results from the survey were analysed and suggestions were considered for improvement.

A new method of handover using MS Teams was trialled. During subsequent PDSA cycles change ideas were adopted to improve engagement with the new process and allow for safe handovers.

On a weekly basis, post-intervention level of overall satisfaction with the new handover process was measured using the same Likert scale. Other measurements measured weekly included:

  1. 1. Percentage of handovers completed using the agreed template

  2. 2. Percentage of handed over jobs being acknowledged to signify receipt of handover

Results

Pre-intervention, verbal handover was the most frequent way of handing over (85.7%) followed by Whatsapp/text messaging (64.3%) and paper (42.9%).

Baseline level of overall satisfaction of handover process is 21.4%. At the end of PDSA Cycle 1, this increased significantly to 78% and by week 10 (end of PDSA Cycle 2) it rose to 92%.

Pre-intervention, 35.7% of junior doctors reported feeling confident in the handed over tasks being completed. 28.5% were confident that the handover process is confidential and 14.3% that it is sufficient for medico-legal purposes.

Post-intervention, 100% of the handovers are completed using a standardised template and 100% of the tasks were being acknowledged by the appropriate team members.

Conclusion

Prior to this intervention the process of junior doctor handover was not uniform and led to near-misses. This created confusion hence opportunities for errors to occur which can compromise patients’ care. Following the introduction of MS Teams as the handover platform, overall satisfaction from junior doctors on the handover process has increased significantly. Moreover, it provides a clear record of handovers taking place which ensures accountability, safety and continuity of patients’ care.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.