Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-05T23:35:51.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A quality improvement project to improve the physical health of people with intellectual disability & severe mental illness in a forensic inpatient ward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Rupal Dave*
Affiliation:
East London NHS Foundation Trust
Rachael Miller
Affiliation:
John Howard Centre for Forensic Mental Health
Lucy Bermange
Affiliation:
John Howard Centre for Forensic Mental Health
Laura Humphries
Affiliation:
John Howard Centre for Forensic Mental Health
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Review physical health risk factors of service users Co-produce personalised care plans for service users Improve health knowledge and confidence in self-management of health problems Support reduction in risk by improving physical activity levels and supporting healthy dietary choices.

Background

People with intellectual disability have poorer physical health outcomes than those without intellectual disability; there is higher prevalence of obesity, constipation and diabetes in this group of the population, and consistent evidence of premature mortality. Excess mortality in persons with severe mental illness has also been established.

Empowering patients to take an active role in their care, is good practice and encouraged as part of the NHS Long Term Plan.

Quality Improvement methodology was used to design and deliver a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) intervention, on a forensic mental health ward for persons with intellectual disability, to improve physical health in this patient group.

Method

Cardiovascular risk was assessed for 13 patients on a low secure forensic mental health ward. Measures of weight, BMI, blood pressure, resting heart rate, smoking status & status regarding prescription of psychotropic medications were collected.

Together with individual comorbidities and activity levels, a personalised care plan was co-produced by MDT members and patients. Motivational interviewing techniques were adapted to support patients to set personal goals.

Education sessions were designed in 'easy-read' format and delivered by MDT members in a group format. Focus groups were held with service users and with staff members to explore barriers to change. Based on these, specific ideas to increase physical activity and support healthy dietary changes were introduced.

The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) questionnaire was modified and used to assess confidence and knowledge in preventing or reducing health problems, and maintaining changes.

Result

Cardiovascular risk and activity levels were assessed for 13 inpatients. 85% of patients had a BMI in the overweight or obese range. 62% were regular cigarette smokers. 92% were prescribed psychotropic medications. On review of 2 months of opportunities for activity, all patients were categorised as 'inactive'. Patients engaged to varying degrees to co-produce personalised care plans and to engage in group education and physical activity. Of these patients, all showed improvement in measures of Patient Activation and activity level.

Conclusion

An individualised approach is required in exploring physical health problems, considering modifiable risk factors and addressing barriers to change. Co-production, and active participation of MDT members in role-modelling 'healthy habits' was positively reported by patients to facilitate self-management.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.