Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:42:14.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Quality Improvement Project: Improving the Presentation of Assessments Within a Liaison Psychiatry Department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Shivali Jain
Affiliation:
Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom
Natalie Maalouf
Affiliation:
Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom
Khalil Hassanally
Affiliation:
Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom
Raman Rashwany*
Affiliation:
Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom
Asha Faldu
Affiliation:
Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom
Krishna Amin
Affiliation:
Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) was undertaken within a Liaison Psychiatry (LP) department at a district general hospital in North West London. The current service model has LP nurses and junior doctors providing first contact with patients, and subsequently discussing assessments with the team psychiatrists. A need for effective communication when presenting clinical cases has emerged given high rates of staff turnover. The aims of this QIP were; (1) To assess the quality of presentations within the multidisciplinary team (2) to deliver a targeted teaching session focused on frameworks for assessment presentation and (3) to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.

Methods

The ‘SBAR: Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation’ communication tool already used widely within healthcare was adapted for LP by an MDT including doctors, senior nurses and pharmacist.

A survey was designed with MDT input to collect data about the content of presentations using adapted Likert scales, a quantitative global score and qualitative data highlighting areas for improvement. Over two weeks, senior team members completed surveys for every patient discussion.

A targeted teaching session was delivered on the adapted LP SBAR including: presenting complaint, current medical issues, referral question, psychiatric background, mental state examination, delirium/cognitive screening, risk assessment, impression and management plan. The session included breakout groups with clinical vignettes to practice presenting. All team members filled in a pre- and post-intervention surveys rating their confidence in presenting assessments and received copies of teaching materials.

Data were collected over a 2-week period post-intervention using the same methodology as pre-intervention. Post-intervention data were presented to the MDT and feedback was sought for improvement in the next cycle.

Results

Pre-intervention data (n=30) indicated a risk assessment, impression and plan were often missed from presentations.

Following targeted teaching, team members felt more confident presenting assessments, formulating impressions, and management plans. Post-intervention data (n=22) showed an improvement in inclusion of all key information covered in the LP SBAR except management plans. The percentage of presentations with a global score ≥7 increased from 41% to 57%.

Conclusion

This ‘Plan, Do, Study, Act’ cycle has modestly improved the quality of assessment presentations within LP and has identified a critical need for communication tools within LP. We will perform another cycle in February 2023 given the high turnover of staff and continue to seek feedback from the MDT on the effectiveness of this targeted teaching session to continue to improve the presentation of assessments in LP.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.