Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:13:48.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Portfolio Pathway to Specialist Registration; Success in CESR for Applicants and Trusts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Sarah Holmes*
Affiliation:
RCPsych, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Neeraj Berry
Affiliation:
RCPsych, London, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

In line with the 2023 legislative change and move to the New Standard of CESR, this will be an informative and educational presentation directed at CESR applicants, and Local Trusts who wish to implement support for CESR. With this suite of support we aim to dispel concerns relating to CESR.

Methods

Mapping guidance to the New Standard of CESR. Production of College guidance in line with the legislative changes, to support success in CESR. Building a CESR Network for all stakeholders.

Results

Delivery of training, a suite of guidance and CESR Roadshows across the four nations.

Conclusion

Creating awareness and spreading communication. Ongoing support for Applicants, Trusts and other CESR stakeholders. Clarity for Applicants, particularly in relation to which Cohort to select, what evidence to include and how to submit a successful application first time.

Type
2 Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.