Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:05:45.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neuropsychiatry Teaching for Medical Students: A Narrative Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Philip Spani-Orchin*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Elliott Tsai-Goodman
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Mohan Rathnaiah
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Neuropsychiatry is a new and burgeoning field of medicine that combines neuroscientific principles with neurology and psychiatric medicine. Currently, there is little to none medical school literature and/or teaching in the subject. Re-integration of Neurology and Psychiatry disciplines has been recommended, especially in undergraduate and graduate medical training as well as in research. Neuropsychiatry disorders are considered one of the most important causes of disability by the World Health Organization. As a concept, Neuropsychiatry is still not clear on a global scale, from neurological examination to medical school teaching. There have already been active efforts to design and implement Neuropsychiatry training to post-graduate trainees worldwide, particularly in USA, Australia and UK. However, there seems to be no such endeavours towards teaching medical students the role of the brain in the manifestation of neurological as well as psychiatry symptoms. We set out to complete a targeted literature review looking for Neuropsychiatry teaching, if any, in medical schools worldwide.

Methods

A systematic literature search of relevant key phrases was carried out in PubMed and Google Scholar databases. These phrases were searched between 29–31 January 2024 aimed to encompass the full scope of available teaching resources and materials across psychiatry and neurosciences worldwide. These searches included:

  1. (((Neuropsychiatry) AND (Medical students)) AND (Medical school)) AND (Medical education)

  2. (((Neuropsychiatry education) AND (training)) AND (medical students)) AND (Medical education)

  3. (Neuroscience-in-psychiatry) AND (medical school)

  4. ((Neuropsychiatry) AND (Medical education)) AND (Medical students)

  5. Further reading was completed from the selected articles (six in total).

Results

A total of 324 results were found from systematic literature search after leaving out the duplicates, of which only 6 articles were included as relevant to aim of our study. None of the articles described clear Neuropsychiatry teaching to the medical students.

Conclusion

Our review highlighted a distinct lack of Neuropsychiatry learning outcomes within medical school curriculum. Neuroscientific principles and methodologies are incorporated in treatment of patients, rationalising clear differentiation between neurology or psychiatry, but the overall picture from both disciplines and utilisation towards diagnosing and managing the cluster of symptoms manifesting from aberrant brain processes is still unclear. In line with previous research around education measurement, we propose that fundamentals from both Neurology and Psychiatry need to be introduced as clinical neuroscience early in medical school and this can be further continued.

Type
2 Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.