Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T23:01:51.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monitoring of Antipsychotics in CAMHS Intellectual Disability Service in Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Sadia Batool*
Affiliation:
LSCFT, Preston, United Kingdom
Wala Kamal Abbas
Affiliation:
LSCFT, Preston, United Kingdom
Abimbola Oyedokun
Affiliation:
CWP, Cheshire, United Kingdom
Mischa Oyed
Affiliation:
LSCFT, Preston, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To ascertain the service performance against the standards set by National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on physical health monitoring of children and adolescents prescribed antipsychotics.

Methods

Initial audit: April–June 2021.

Re-audit: January–February 2024.

Registered with the Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust audit department. An audit tool was developed by the investigators. The investigators carried out a review of patient electronic records and clinical letters to gather information pertaining to initiation of antipsychotics and physical health monitoring.

Results

Amongst other variables in this trust-wide audit, we considered age, ethnic background, reason of initiation of anti-psychotic, comorbid conditions among which most common is epilepsy, dose of antipsychotic used and distributions across various CCGs. Were they regularly reviewed by medic reviews and side effects monitored? We also looked at choice of antipsychotic used, which was largely aripiprazole and risperidone. Were antipsychotic bloods done or not and were we able to complete children's height and weight measurements whilst they were on antipsychotics? It was important that these are documented as being considered or ‘offered' even if could not be successfully completed due to e.g. challenging behaviour from the child. Detailed and comparative results can be shown in final submission along with charts.

Conclusion

The recommendations from initial audit were compared with the second audit, and whilst some of them were completed such as incorporating growth chart in the electronic records system, some ongoing challenges were identified. Positive and negative findings were both noted although the final conclusions lies in favour of good changes been made to service including the caseload becoming more ID specific in this age group.

Type
5 Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.