Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:41:06.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mental wellbeing in doctors: the measure matters! development of a core outcome set for measuring wellbeing in doctors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

David Baldwin*
Affiliation:
Professor of Psychiatry and Head of Mental Health Group, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Honorary Professor of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, South Africa Visiting Professor, Shandong Mental Health Centre, China
Aimee O'Neill
Affiliation:
Centre for Workforce Wellbeing, University of southampton
Julia Sinclair
Affiliation:
Professor of Psychiatry and Head of Mental Health Group, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Honorary Professor of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, South Africa Visiting Professor, Shandong Mental Health Centre, China
Gemma Simons
Affiliation:
Centre for Workforce Wellbeing, University of southampton
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To achieve a consensus Core Outcome Set for measuring mental wellbeing in doctors.

Hypothesis: A minimum set of valid, reliable and practical wellbeing measures is needed for doctors.

Background

The importance of doctors’ mental wellbeing to everyone using Health Care is highlighted by the levels of burnout reported in doctors around the world. In 2019 a number of UK policy documents made recommendations for the wellbeing of doctors, but how those wellbeing interventions are evaluated needs to be defined. Core Outcome Sets are increasingly being used in medicine to prevent waste in research, by recommending the inclusion of a minimum set of valid, reliable and practical measures. An operational definition and Core Outcome Set for wellbeing in doctors is needed to meaningfully progress the work in this field.

Method

The Centre for Workforce Wellbeing (C4WW), a collaboration between the University of Southampton and Health Education England, was created to support research into the nature, assessment and enhancement of wellbeing in physicians. A Systematic Review of wellbeing measures used in doctors and the robustness of those measures, along with surveys of 250 UK doctors of all grades and specialities and patient and public involvement is informing what a core outcome set could be. A Delphi Study among 37 UK experts has been initiated to establish the consensus Core Outcome Set.

Result

Publication of research into doctors’ wellbeing is growing internationally. In the UK alone data are being captured by multiple national organisations including: the Care Quality Commission, General Medical Council, British Medical Association and the Royal Colleges. Health and Social Care Organisations are, therefore, keen to “do something” and are spending money on wellbeing interventions with little, or no, evidence base and a lack of appropriate, comparable evaluation. A Core Outcome Set for measuring wellbeing in doctors is ethically required to reduce waste, to replace burnout measures and to refine wellbeing interventions.

Conclusion

Wellbeing measures that actually measure wellbeing, and not burnout, which are validated, reliable and practical, are needed to inform local organisational, national government and international research policy. An absence of burnout does not equate to wellbeing. The focus of measurement needs to shift to capture in what contexts we thrive, not just survive. If everyone used the same Core Outcome Set to measure mental wellbeing, direct comparisons could be made, and money invested, in creating infrastructure, processes and cultures that really work.

Health Education England funded PhD.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.