Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:41:38.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving the Referral Process Between Acute Wards and the Psychiatry Department at Tameside General Hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2022

Claudia Bann*
Affiliation:
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Sharon Yeung
Affiliation:
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Emmalene Fish
Affiliation:
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The project aims to address the barriers faced by the acute hospital and the psychiatry department in the referral process for a psychiatric opinion, at Tameside General Hospital (TGH). The Care Quality Commission (CQC) undertook a review of how people's mental health needs were met in acute hospitals in 2017 and concluded that there were barriers to this, for multifactorial reasons. Examples included: acute hospital staff not feeling adequately prepared to treat mental health conditions and lack of mental health care services 24/7. The current referral process at TGH for the acute hospital doctors requesting a psychiatric opinion presents a challenge for the referring doctor and psychiatry doctor in receipt of the referral. Many at the acute hospital have found the process of referral unclear, and many in the psychiatric department have found that referrals seldom contain sufficient information to determine whether a psychiatric review is required and whether it needs to be prioritised.

Methods

To understand the specific difficulties encountered during the referral process, two questionnaires were created. One for TGH acute trust doctors and one for the psychiatry doctors, asking what the perceived barriers were and how these could be overcome. Data were collected between September and October 2021.

Results

We obtained results from 17 acute trust doctors. The results revealed that most referring doctors found the referral process unclear. 100% agreed that they would benefit from guidance with the referral process e.g., a psychiatry specific referral form and/or a flow chart outlining the referral process. All responders wanted guidance around the roles and responsibilities of the psychiatric team in relation to the hospital setting.

We obtained results from 7 psychiatry doctors. Most were not satisfied with the referrals received. 100% would like to see a specific psychiatry referral form implemented in the acute hospital.

Conclusion

Key findings were: the referral process is unclear, acute trust doctors don't feel well enough equipped to manage mental health concerns, referrals don't contain sufficient patient information, and that the acute trust doctors don't know where to ask for help. The project reflected earlier CQC findings.

After discussion with the acute trust, our action plan includes creating a psychiatry-specific referral form, to be distributed together with a flow chart which directs acute trust doctors to the appropriate source for psychiatric opinions. We also aim to join departmental and junior doctor teachings regularly to distribute and educate on the process.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.