Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:50:42.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving the Knowledge, Skills and Confidence of Clinicians Towards Mental Health: An Educational Intervention Based on Reflective Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Meda Alinia*
Affiliation:
Hertfordshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hatfield, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Mental illness-related stigma, including that which exists in the healthcare system creates serious barriers to access and quality care. People with lived experience of a mental illness commonly report feeling devalued, dismissed, and dehumanized by many of the health professionals with whom they come into contact. While working in the mental health liaison team in a local general hospital I have experienced first-hand these issues. We decided to organise regular reflective sessions for staff to reflect on what the barriers are to being able to manage patients with mental illness better on the wards, raise mental health awareness, improve staff communication skills, and offer teaching sessions to improve the staff knowledge of psychiatric pathology.

Methods

Before starting, we offered a feedback form to staff to ascertain the value of the project.

To ascertain that the learning has taken place, we have delivered a post-session formative quiz to assess the staff's knowledge of managing patients with mental illness.

To determine the effectiveness of the project, we decided to use Kirkpatrick's evaluation model and assess the first two levels of the programme outcome: (1) learner satisfaction- through staff feedback; (2) measures of learning- knowledge gained showed in the formative post-session quiz.

Results

The sessions were carried out on 2 wards in the general hospital

  • Ward 1: 4 sessions; number of attendees: 12

  • Ward 2: 4 sessions; number of attendees: 5

The student evaluation was done through a quiz offered to the participants at the end of each session.

9 quiz questionnaires were completed on ward 1:

Correct answers: Q1- 67%; Q2- 89%; Q3- 0%; Q4- 100%.

5 quiz questionnaires were completed on ward 2:

Correct answers: Q1- 20%; Q2- 60%; Q3- 0%; Q4- 40%.

The programme evaluation was done through a feedback form offered to the participants at the end of each session.

12 forms were completed on ward 1: 50% strongly agreed that the session was useful to their practice; 70% were quite confident in caring for patients with mental illness following the session.

5 forms were completed on ward 2: 20% strongly agreed that the session was beneficial; 75% were quite confident in caring for patients with mental illness following the session.

Conclusion

Difficult to implement a culture change.

Following a meeting with the stakeholders, we agreed on delivering monthly reflective sessions to the staff in their allocated “team time” where attendance is mandatory and we will also take part in a developmental teaching programme for band 5 nursing staff

We are in the process of extending our project to the Emergency department

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.