Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:33:00.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving the Assessment and Management of Acute Alcohol Withdrawal on General and Older Adult Mental Health Inpatient Wards – Baseline Data and Proposed Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Emma Pope
Affiliation:
Livewell South West, Plymouth, United Kingdom
Charlotte Turner*
Affiliation:
Livewell South West, Plymouth, United Kingdom
James George
Affiliation:
Livewell South West, Plymouth, United Kingdom
Myo Min Soe
Affiliation:
Livewell South West, Plymouth, United Kingdom
Lucy Westwood
Affiliation:
Livewell South West, Plymouth, United Kingdom
Jenny Nguyen
Affiliation:
Livewell South West, Plymouth, United Kingdom
Beth Hopwood
Affiliation:
Livewell South West, Plymouth, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The management of alcohol withdrawal has become a national focus amongst psychiatry with recent POMH-UK audit data suggesting many aspects for improvement, whilst alcohol competencies have been reintroduced into the core training curriculum. The first part of this project was to evaluate the current standards of assessing and managing alcohol withdrawal on acute inpatient wards within Livewell South West and to survey doctors’ confidence levels in this area.

Methods

All admissions to the acute adult and older adult inpatient wards at Livewell SW between March and July 2022 were included in the initial data collection. An audit tool was designed to evaluate the initial assessment of alcohol use, the withdrawal risk and subsequent management. Guidance was provided to the authors assessing the records.

A survey to all doctors was conducted during a CPD session about this project which assessed confidence levels in the assessment and management of alcohol withdrawal.

Results

On initiation of this project, it was noted there was no trust guideline or policy to manage those presenting with possible alcohol withdrawal symptoms.

120 patient admissions were assessed against the audit tool. Half of these (53%) had alcohol intake documented on admission.

11 patients (9%) were found to be at risk of alcohol withdrawal symptoms (n.b 46% too little data). 5 (45%) of these were identified promptly and 4 (36%) were given thiamine (1 parental, 3 oral). Only 4 out of the 11 (36%) were prescribed benzodiazepines, these 4 patients were also considered for referral to alcohol services. Relapse medications were not considered for any patients. No significant incidents were noted.

Generally, trainee doctors feel confident in recognising and managing alcohol withdrawal in acute hospital settings but have difficulties on psychiatric inpatient wards. A major reason stated for this was the difficulty distinguishing between psychiatric and alcohol withdrawal symptoms and also concerns surrounding prescribing benzodiazepines

Conclusion

This project identified a need for a trust policy which has subsequently been developed and is currently being ratified.

The initial baseline results show poor assessment of alcohol use and low confidence amongst doctors in assessing and managing alcohol withdrawal in this population. Several interventions have been identified that could be trialled to improve these results. Further training has been given to junior doctors involved in initial assessment and other interventions planned include posters, electronic prompts, nursing survey and education. Furthermore, patient focus groups are planned to understand patients’ perspective and help guide further training.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.