Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-vrt8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:12:34.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implementation of treatment escalation plans in a community psychiatric hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Anne Yan Ting Chua*
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Adnaan Ghanchi
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Jessica Grayston
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Nida Yasmeen
Affiliation:
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
Sean Insigne
Affiliation:
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
Stephen Woolford
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Sahan Wijayaweera
Affiliation:
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
Harnish P Patel
Affiliation:
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
Jay Amin
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Sangeeta Makh
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Treatment Escalation Plans (TEP) detail appropriate ceilings of care and guide treatment of patients based on shared decision making. Whilst established in many acute trusts, TEP are not frequently used in community mental health hospitals. This is particularly concerning in organic mental health wards, where patients with severe dementia may be transferred to acute hospitals for treatment without consideration about whether this is appropriate. Our aim for this quality improvement project was to develop and implement TEP within a community mental health hospital to support the management of our older patients with severe mental illness.

Method

We designed a TEP form based on a prototype used in a partner acute trust and evaluated its use on our wards, comprising 20 patients between August-September 2020. This included clear options of the different ceilings of care and what they comprised of for our patients. We obtained quantitative data on the use of TEP, including the length of time from admission to completion, as well as qualitative data from healthcare staff regarding their experience of using TEP.

Result

TEP implementation was feasible and well received among members of staff. All 20 patients had a TEP in place within 2 weeks of admission. The mean number of days taken to complete a TEP form in August-September was 7.1. A snapshot done 2 months later showed new admissions had a mean number of days to complete TEP reduced to 3.2. There was an improvement in understanding the purpose, comprehensiveness and location of TEP forms during their implementation. The key theme that arose from qualitative analysis of healthcare staff comments was that TEP forms provided clear guidance on the appropriateness of escalation of care.

Conclusion

TEP forms offer clear guidance to treating clinicians about the ceilings of care for patients. This also allows for open conversations with patients or their next of kins regarding ceiling of care. This is especially important in mental health inpatients with dementia, when escalation of treatment is not always appropriate. TEP were successfully implemented in our community mental health hospital and we plan further post-implementation evaluation. We intend to roll out the TEP form across our mental health trust and share findings globally to promote best practice.

Type
Rapid-Fire Poster Presentations
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.