Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:41:15.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Descriptive Analysis of the Clinical and Demographic Features of High Intensity Users of Charing Cross Hospital Emergency Department; Utilisation of These Data to Develop Local Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Yena Cho*
Affiliation:
West London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Thomas Kydd-Coutts
Affiliation:
Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom
Anastasia Newman
Affiliation:
Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom
Sachin Patel
Affiliation:
West London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Emma Schofield
Affiliation:
Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Over recent years, there has been increasing national focus on High Intensity Users (HIU's) of Emergency Department's (ED's) and services designed to case manage and address the unmet needs of these individuals. The descriptive research literature focuses on measurable, demographic identifiers of this group, attendance trends and the presenting complaints driving attendance. There is more variable literature on the clinical profiles of these individuals, with findings describing a highly heterogeneous group. Our inner city service is well-established and staffed by a multidisciplinary team. We provide assessments and interventions to meet the needs of HIU's identified through a referral system which includes electronic flagging of cases. We aim to describe in detail the clinical and demographic features of a cohort of HIU's attending our department and demonstrate the utility of these data.

Methods

All individuals managed by the HIU service in 2022 were identified from our referral database. No individual was excluded. We undertook systematic notes reviews on each case, using medical, psychiatric and primary care records as well as interventional care plans produced by the service. Data were recorded against set domains covering socio-economic factors, demographics and clinical coding.

Results

The analysis included 98 individuals. The majority were male (59%) with 85% in receipt of government benefits and 16% of no fixed abode. A variety of psychiatric diagnoses were present with 12% diagnosed with a psychotic illness, 40% with a mood disorder, 7% with a somatoform condition and 19% with a personality disorder. 83% were diagnosed with a medical long term condition (LTC), with 32% of these being diagnosed with >3 LTC's. 81% suffered from at least 1 LTC and 1 mental disorder in combination. 40% harmfully used or were dependent on alcohol and 21% misused recreational drugs. Known or likely cognitive impairment was seen in 28% of the group and 13% were diagnosed with learning disability.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate the complexity of the clinical profiles of HIU's of the ED and supports service models centred on individual case management. There is a high degree of mental and physical morbidity in this group, indicating that specialist assessment and management is required. The range of unmet need covers a breadth of health and social care requiring a multi-disciplinary approach. Homelessness, cognitive impairment and learning disability are particular areas which may benefit from expertise. Our project is limited to one localised system however we recommend ED's undertake similar analyses to better design HIU services.

Type
Service Evaluation
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.