Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:14:51.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Culturally Adapted School-Based Suicide Prevention Program for Pakistani Adolescents: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Sehrish Irshad
Affiliation:
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning (PILL), Karachi, Pakistan
Tayyeba Kiran
Affiliation:
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning (PILL), Karachi, Pakistan
Nasim Chaudhry*
Affiliation:
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning (PILL), Karachi, Pakistan
Nusrat Husain
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Maria Panagioti
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Suicide is one of the leading causes of death among young people. For adolescents, schools are considered as the best place to identify and respond to youth suicide risk but evidence on culturally sensitive, school-based suicide prevention programs is limited in low-resource settings such as Pakistan. This study aims to explore the perspectives of students, parents, teachers, and general practitioners regarding cultural adaptation, participation experiences, identified areas for improvement, and recommendations for scaling up the school-based suicide prevention program in Pakistan.

Methods

This qualitative study was nested in a pilot randomized controlled trial that aimed at exploring the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of three suicide prevention interventions: (1) Linking Education and Awareness of Depression and Suicide-LEADS training for students (12–17 years), (2) Question-Persuade-Refer (QPR) training for teachers and parents and (3) Professional screening of at-risk students (ProfScreen) for health practitioners. A total of 8 focus group discussion (FGDs) were conducted at pre- and post-intervention stage with each type of stakeholder (students, teachers, parents and health professionals) by trained qualitative researchers using the semi-structured topic guides. Each FGDs involved a detailed presentation on intervention, sharing videos and educational posters.

Results

As a result of pre-intervention FGDs, adaptations were made in the content of the interventions and were further refined through consultations with Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement group. All stakeholders who participated in post-intervention FGDs marked this suicide prevention program as feasible, acceptable and helpful in both identifying the risk of and preventing self-harm and suicide among young individuals, while also enhancing treatment pathways. Stakeholders perceived the interventions as valuable in augmenting knowledge about mental health, understanding the impact of mental health challenges on functioning, reducing stigma, and providing stakeholders with the necessary skills to identify and guide at-risk individuals. Teachers and parents endorsed the importance of discussing issues with children. Improvement in clinical practice of clinicians and teaching practice of teachers as well as understanding others’ behaviors were also reported.

Conclusion

This study highlights potential role of culturally adapted school-based youth suicide prevention program for settings where rates of suicide are high and there are limited mental healthcare resources in addition to limited access to healthcare. School-based suicide prevention program is perceived as helpful in improving knowledge, attitudes, and help-seeking behaviours in adolescents.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.