Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:37:24.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Complex PTSD Pathway for Kingfisher Mother and Baby Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Jemima Jackson*
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

When Kingfisher Mother and Baby Unit (MBU) opened in 2019 personality disorder and severe self-harming behaviours were exclusion criteria for admission. Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (C-PTSD) with its emotional dysregulation, interpersonal difficulties and common presence of self-harm was similarly categorised.

Currently, C-PTSD presentations are frequently admitted to the MBU, making up around 45.9% of admissions. There is increasing understanding of the importance of effective and trauma informed treatment in admission outcomes, particularly in reducing trans-generational trauma. This requires appropriate skills and training in staff.

Methods

Service users were identified retrospectively over a 24-month period and categorised into C-PTSD traits (trait) and non-C-PTSD traits (non-trait). Comparisons of routine outcome measures (ROMs) identified higher distress in the C-PTSD group and reduced satisfaction. Staff survey highlighted areas of anxiety and low confidence in working with service users with C-PTSD traits.

Actions were divided into three streams – Admission, Transitions and Communication. Staff training needs were identified and training given. Admission processes were reviewed with a focus group including past service users and changes based on DBT principles were implemented. A leaflet was developed to aid communication with service users considering MBU admission via Outreach and Community Perinatal teams.

Results

Surveys were the primary source of data before and after changes. As of September 2023 the majority of training had been rolled out but numbers completing the training survey were too small to draw conclusions. Anecdotal feedback was predominantly positive and the survey will be repeated at the same time as other data in March 2024.

Ward process changes started in late August 2023 and routine outcome measure data will be compared at 6 months (March 2024). Again anecdotal feedback is positive.

The leaflet was rolled out for use by community teams and service users in November 2023 and feedback via survey will be collected in March 2024.

Conclusion

Evaluation of routine outcome measures showed poorer outcomes and experiences for patients with traits of Complex-PTSD. Staff survey highlighted lack of confidence in managing the same. Consultation with a range of staff and past service users led to changes in admission practices, communication prior to admission via a leaflet, and staff training. Anecdotal feedback since implementation has been positive but we hope to see this confirmed in the Routine Outcome Measures and surveys 6 months after the changes were implemented.

Type
3 Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.