Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:00:19.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attachment to Parents and Childhood Trauma in Adolescent Patients With Non-Suicidal Self-Injurious Behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Nessma Abdelhafez*
Affiliation:
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom Psychiatry and Addiction Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Azza El-Bakry
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Addiction Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Walaa Fakher
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Addiction Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To explore the phenomenon of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in adolescent patients and to assess adolescent-parent attachment and childhood trauma in relation to NSSI behaviour through a case control comparison between adolescents with and without NSSI.

Methods

NSSI group included 30 adolescent patients presenting to psychiatry outpatient clinic with history of NSSI. Controls were 30 non-psychiatric adolescent patients recruited from other specialties outpatient clinics. Tools applied were: Semi-structured Psychiatric Interview, Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM IV-TR) Axis I and II Disorders (SCID-I and II), Brief Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Assessment tool (BNSSI-AT), Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA)-Parent form, Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Patient-rated tools were translated into Arabic language.

Results

Self-cutting was the primary method of NSSI in 86.7% followed by interference with wound healing in 73.3%. Of NSSI group, 60% met the criteria for diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) while 16.7% showed only traits. Moreover, 40% were diagnosed with depressive disorders. While 93.3% used NSSI to deal with anger, 80% used it to cope with uncomfortable feelings or to relieve stress and pressure. In addition, 73.3% reported self-injuring because of their self-hatred. The main motivation for initial NSSI was negative feelings such as being upset (90%), being angry at oneself (73.3%) or at someone else (53.3%). Also, 36.7% reported seeing it in media or reading about it while 40% of the motivations were found related to peer pressure. NSSI group scored significantly lower than controls in their attachment to parents (particularly to mothers). A positive correlation was found between perceived parental care and attachment to parents (mainly trust and communication). A statistically significant difference was found between both groups regarding severity of childhood trauma experiences. In NSSI group, emotional neglect was reported in 80%, emotional abuse in 63.3%, sexual abuse in 50% and physical abuse in 46.7%. Perceived emotional neglect was positively correlated with sense of alienation from fathers and negatively correlated with trust in mothers.

Conclusion

Females constituted 80% of the NSSI group, primarily with the diagnosis of BPD. The most common method of NSSI was “self-cutting”. A significantly high percentage of adolescents with NSSI described their attachment to parents as insecure. The majority of NSSI patients perceived their relationship to both parents as “affectionless control”. A significant correlation was found between perceived parental care and security of attachment. Results also suggest that different types of child maltreatment might predict later NSSI.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.