Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T04:30:50.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Item-Level Systematic Review of the Presentation of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Females

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Annabelle Xiao Hui Lim*
Affiliation:
Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Tamara Williams
Affiliation:
Division of Psychological Medicine & Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Louise Horstmann
Affiliation:
Division of Psychological Medicine & Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Anita Thapar
Affiliation:
Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Joanna Martin
Affiliation:
Division of Psychological Medicine & Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Sex differences in the prevalence of ADHD are well reported in the literature, with childhood ADHD being diagnosed 7–8 times more frequently in males than females, despite a population sex ratio of 3–4:1. A recent consensus statement argued that ADHD is under-identified and under-diagnosed in the UK, and this is especially concerning with regards to females. This systematic review aims to investigate specific symptoms characterising the manifestation of ADHD in females compared with both males with ADHD and females without ADHD.

Methods

A systematic search of eligible studies was conducted using predefined search criteria across six databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid APA PsycINFO, ProQuest, EBSCO ERIC and EBSCO British Education Index), in line with a registration protocol on PROSPERO. Eligible studies included those with statistical analysis comparing ADHD, impact or co-occurring mental health difficulties at the item level, which compared ADHD symptoms in both sexes, or contrasted females with and without ADHD. Studies that exclusively reported total scores without item-level statistical results were excluded. A total of 5,378 articles were identified in the search and 13 studies met the criteria for inclusion.

Results

Outcomes from 13 studies were analysed thematically. 7 studies looked at ADHD at an item level, while 7 studies explored disparities in impairment or other items. Of the eligible studies, 12 compared males and females with ADHD and 4 compared females with and without ADHD. 7 studies focussed on children with ADHD and 6 on adults. Preliminary results from 3 studies of ADHD symptoms in children indicated sex differences in hyperactive and impulsive symptoms: males were more likely to exhibit symptoms such as fidgeting and difficulty remain seated, while females exhibited higher rates of excessive talking and interrupting. Sex differences in impairment showed mixed results. Females with ADHD endorsed self-reported items related to mind-wandering and parent-reported impairment, including friendship difficulties, more than females without ADHD. Overall, the analysis of the results suggested that most studies do show some sex differences in ADHD and impairment items.

Conclusion

While current studies of individuals diagnosed with ADHD highlight important sex differences, the limited number of direct investigations and predominant focus on total symptoms underscore the need for further research. Item-level analysis of symptoms and their impact is essential in exploring how sex influences the associations between ADHD, risk factors and functional outcomes. Recognising potential sex differences is essential for improving ADHD assessment in females and later life outcomes.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.