Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:38:22.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Audit on Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment in Older Persons Mental Health Inpatient Unit in North Wales With the Aim of a Quality Improvement Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Sathyan Soundararajan*
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom
Asha Dhandapani
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom
Finlay Wallis
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, United Kingdom
Manjiri Bhalerao
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Conwy, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The aim is to undertake a baseline audit of VTE risk assessment in older persons mental health unit in all 3 sites in North Wales. Following the implementation of recommendations, we aim to repeat the audit with an aim to complete a Quality improvement project.

Methods

A retrospective audit was conducted in older persons mental health unit in all 3 sites of North Wales in Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board.

A prospective opportunistic sample of all the inpatients in the old age psychiatric unit was audited. Standards were based on the NICE and Department of Health guidelines.

We collected the data by reviewing the patients notes. The data collection happened in December 2022 to January 2023. We made a simple protocol to collect the data from all 3 sites.

The target was for 100 % compliance in all standards.

Results

From the audit data collection, the results are as follows:

Overall, we gathered details of 29 patients in East, 21 patients in Central and 11 patients in the West (A total of 61 patients)

In the East, out of 29 patients, there was a form for VTE risk assessment in clerking proforma. However only 6/9 forms were filled by the junior doctors. In Central, out of 21 patients, only 2 patients had a form in their file but they were not filled. In Bryn Hesketh unit, there were no VTE risk assessment forms at all. In West, out of 11 patients, 3 of them had a VTE risk assessment form that were filled. Overall, we noticed that in some of the patient's medication chart, there was a mention about they receive prophylaxis for VTE or not. However, that was not consistent.

There is no standard proforma noted in any of the wards in Central and West. In East, there is a clerking proforma noted and in some patients hence as part of the proforma as the VTE risk assessment is already included the junior doctors do fill the VTE risk assessment form.

Conclusion

I hope this audit will help in improving the patient care by identifying the risks factors of VTE earlier and preventing it. This would be in accordance with the guidelines.

It was evident that VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis was not something that was being considered for patients admitted to the old age psychiatric inpatient unit. However due to the risk factors this group of patients possess it is something vitally important. As a consequence of presenting the audit across the trust, a service change was recommended with a VTE risk assessment proforma planned to be introduced across the trust will be adapted to support use in psychiatric inpatients which can be used by mental health trusts.

Type
Rapid-Fire Presentations
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.