Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:39:54.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are recovery colleges socially acceptable?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Hannah Thornhill
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Trust, Rathbone Rehabilitation Centre, Rathbone Hospital, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
Arpan Dutta
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Trust, Rathbone Rehabilitation Centre, Rathbone Hospital, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recovery colleges offer an educational approach which is believed to develop people's strengths rather than focusing attention on their problems. We have reviewed the literature on this subject, with the aim of determining whether this approach to the management of mental health disorders is socially acceptable. We found preliminary evidence that they are indeed acceptable to families and service users. However, the literature is limited. We therefore recommend that further research is undertaken to confirm the status of recovery colleges, with particular reference to the attitudes of family and friends.

Type
Thematic Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016

References

Brock, D. M., Sarason, I. G., Sanghvi, H., et al (1998) The Perceived Acceptance Scale: development and validation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, S. N. & Treuting, M. V. (1991) The Behavior Intervention Rating Scale: development and validation of a pretreatment acceptability and effectiveness measure. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 4351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaig, M., McNay, L., Marland, G., et al (2014) Establishing a recovery college in a Scottish university. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 18, 9297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, J., Repper, J. & Brown, H. (2014) ‘The college is so different from anything I have done’. A study of the characteristics of Nottingham Recovery College. Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 9, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meddings, S., Guglietti, S., Lambe, H., et al (2014a) Student perspectives: recovery college experience. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 18, 142150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meddings, S., Byrne, D., Barnicoat, S., et al (2014b) Co-delivered and co-produced: creating a recovery college in partnership. Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 9, 1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meddings, S., Campbell, E., Guglietti, S., et al (2015) From service user to student – the benefits of recovery college. Clinical Psychology Forum, 268, 3237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, R., Repper, J., Rinaldi, M., et al (2012) Recovery Colleges. Implementing Recovery Through Organisational Change. NHS Centre for Mental Health.Google Scholar
Repper, J. & Perkins, R. (2012) Recovery: a journey of discovery for individuals and services. In Working in Mental Health: Practice and Policy in a Changing Environment (eds Phillips, P., Sandford, T. & Johnston, C.), pp. 4459. Routledge.Google Scholar
Shepherd, G., Boardman, J., Slade, M., et al (2008) Making Recovery a Reality. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.Google Scholar
Shepherd, G., Boardman, J., Burns, M., et al (2010) Implementing Recovery: A Methodology for Organisational Change. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.Google Scholar
Zucchelli, F. A. & Skinner, S. (2013) Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust's (CNWL) Recovery College: the story so far. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 17, 183189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.