Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:20:29.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cognitive therapy of depression rests on substantial theoretical, empirical and clinical foundations: a reply to Dr Gipps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Stirling Moorey
Stirling Moorey*
Affiliation:
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
*
[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dr Gipps claims that the cognitive therapy for depression rests on a mistake. But his anachronistic analysis of Beck's early research from the perspective of current psychoanalytic theory misses the point. The value of the research was not that it disproved psychoanalytic theory, but that it generated a model of depression that has revolutionised psychotherapy research. Psychoanalysts are belatedly adopting research methods that Beck pioneered half a century ago. The cognitive model of depression has explanatory power for both maintenance and vulnerability and has substantial research underpinning it. Cognitive therapy for depression has a larger body of evidence for its efficacy and relapse prevention effect than any other psychotherapy. Transference-focused approaches to depression have yet to establish themselves in the same way.

Type
Special Articles
Information
BJPsych Bulletin , Volume 41 , Issue 5 , October 2017 , pp. 272 - 275
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 The Authors

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

None.

References

1 Tolin, DF. Is cognitive-behavioral therapy more effective than other therapies? A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2010; 30: 710–20.Google Scholar
2 Cuijpers, P, Andersson, G, Donker, T, van Straten, A. Psychological treatment of depression: results of a series of meta-analyses. Nordic J Psychiat 2011; 65: 354–64.Google Scholar
3 Abbass, A. Intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy of treatment-resistant depression: a pilot study. Depress Anxiety 2006; 23: 449–52.Google Scholar
4 Kirsch, I. Antidepressants and the placebo effect. Z Psychol 2014; 222: 128–34.Google Scholar
5 Fountoulakis, K, Möller, H. Efficacy of antidepressants: a re-analysis and re-interpretation of the Kirsch data. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2011; 14: 405–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 McAllister-Williams, RH. Do antidepressants work? A commentary on ‘Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration’ by Kirsch et al. EBMH 2008; 11: 66–8.Google Scholar
7 Khan, A, Leventhal, R, Khan, S, Brown, W. Severity of depression and response to antidepressants and placebo: an analysis of the Food and Drug Administration database. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2002; 22: 40–5.Google Scholar
8 Khan, A, Brodhead, AE, Kolts, RL, Brown, WA. Severity of depressive symptoms and response to antidepressants and placebo in antidepressant trials. J Psychiatr Res 2005; 39: 145–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Fournier, J, DeRubeis, R, Hollon, S, Dimidjian, S, Amsterdam, J, Shelton, R, et al. Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis. JAMA 2010; 303: 47–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Jarrett, RB, Minhajuddin, A, Gershenfeld, H, Friedman, ES, Thase, ME. Preventing depressive relapse and recurrence in higher-risk cognitive therapy responders: a randomized trial of continuation phase cognitive therapy, fluoxetine, or matched pill placebo. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70: 1152–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Hollon, SD, DeRubeis, RJ, Shelton, RC, Amsterdam, JD, Salomon, RM. Prevention of relapse following cognitive therapy vs medications in moderate to severe depression. Arch Gen Psychiat 2005; 62: 417–22.Google Scholar
12 Hollon, SD, Stewart, MO, Strunk, D. Enduring effects for cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of depression and anxiety. Ann Rev Psychol 2006; 57: 285–315.Google Scholar
13 Gyani, A, Shafran, R, Layard, R, Clark, DM. Enhancing recovery rates: Lessons from year one of IAPT. Behav Res Ther 2013; 51: 597–606.Google Scholar
14 Sulloway, F. Freud, Biologist of the Mind: Beyond the Psychoanalytic Legend. Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
15 Milrod, D. A current view of the psychoanalytic theory of depression -with notes on the role of identification, orality, and anxiety. Psychoanal Study Child 1988; 43: 83–99.Google Scholar
16 Rush, AJ, Beck, AT, Kovacs, M, Hollon, S. Comparative efficacy of cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depressed outpatients. Cogn Ther Res 1977; 1: 17–37.Google Scholar
17 Taylor, D. Treatment manuals and the advancement of psychoanalytic knowledge: The Treatment Manual of the Tavistock Adult Depression Study. Int J Psycho-Analysis 2015; 96: 845–75.Google Scholar
18 Beck, AT. Depression: Clinical, Experimental and Theoretical Aspects. Harper and Row, 1967.Google Scholar
19 Beck, AT. The evolution of the cognitive model of depression and its neurobiological correlates. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165: 969–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Beck, AT. Cognitive models of depression. J Cogn Psychother 1987; 1: 5–37.Google Scholar
21 Clark, DA, Beck, AT. Scientific Foundations of Cognitive Theory and Therapy for Depression. John Wiley & Sons, 1999.Google Scholar
22 Dozois, DJA, Beck, AT. Cognitive schemas, beliefs and assumptions. In Risk Factors for Depression (eds KS Dobson, DJA Dojois). Elsevier, 2008.Google Scholar
23 Monroe, SM, Harkness, KL, Life stress, the “kindling” hypothesis, and the recurrence of depression: considerations from a life stress perspective. Psychol Rev 2005; 112: 417–45.Google Scholar
24 Scher, C, Ingram, R, Segal, Z. Cognitive reactivity and vulnerability: empirical evaluation of construct activation and cognitive diatheses in unipolar depression. Clin Psychol Rev 2005; 25: 487–510.Google Scholar
25 Moorey, S. “Is it them or is it me?” Transference and counter-transference in CBT. In How to Become a More Effective CBT Therapist: Mastering Metacompetence in Clinical Practice (eds A Whittington, N Grey). Wiley, 2014.Google Scholar
26 Egal, ZV, Williams, JMG, Teadale, JD. Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression (2nd edition). Guilford Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.