Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:20:48.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response to ‘ECT vs sham ECT for depression: do study limitations invalidate the evidence (and mean we should stop using ECT)?’ – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2021

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Corrigendum
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

There was an error in the title for this article. This has since been updated to reflect the correct title. The author and publisher apologise for this error.

References

Read, J. (2021). Response to ‘ECT vs sham ECT for depression: do study limitations invalidate the evidence (and mean we should stop using ECT)?’. BJPsych Advances, 27(5), 292294. doi: 10.1192/bja.2021.40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.