Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:56:43.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hypnotherapy and therapeutic suggestion: bridging the gap between evidence and utility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2022

Henry Orewa
Affiliation:
Postgraduate student on the Masters in Public Health programme at the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Itoro Udo
Affiliation:
Consultant psychiatrist at City Clinic & Wellness Center, London, Ontario, and Adjunct Professor in the Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. He is an accredited practitioner with the British Society of Clinical and Academic Hypnosis (BSCAH) and holds an Advanced Diploma in Clinical Hypnosis with distinction from Staffordshire University, UK. He uses clinical hypnosis in his daily work, especially in the management of complaints of bodily distress and medically unexplained symptoms.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The use of hypnotherapy in psychiatry has been controversial. However, evidence presented by Chan and colleagues shows that it is beneficial to the promotion of good mental health and well-being, specifically being applicable in the management of mental disorders. But what does this mean for practice? This commentary looks at what we agree and disagree with, what we opine is missing from the article and what now needs to happen. Patients should be able to access hypnotherapy or hypnosis routinely on the National Health Service. Since it works, who may it work for and how may we make this available to those who could benefit from it?

Type
Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Hypnotherapy, also known as hypnosis, involves the use of a formal induction procedure and targeted suggestions to address a particular symptom or group of symptoms. It is more likely to be used as a primary psychological treatment rather than as augmentation of existing treatment. A related though slightly different concept that may find wider use in healthcare is the use of targeted, positive suggestions on their own as therapeutic suggestion (Varga Reference Varga2013). This technique does not require induction, nor does it need to be labelled as hypnosis. Therapeutic suggestion is more likely to be used as an ‘add-on’ rather than as distinct treatment. It can be incorporated as a technique to enhance existing therapies. Many patients and practitioners would feel more open to the use of therapeutic suggestion than a practice labelled ‘hypnotherapy’, which for many will still carry negative associations.

Chan et al's article (Reference Chan, Zhang and Yin2022) presents a comprehensive review of the evidence for hypnotherapy where it exists. The strengths of the article are the timeliness of its presentation, its publication in mainstream mental health literature and its robust review of methodologies and outcomes. Although this evidence has been around for some time, hypnotherapy (hypnosis) continues to struggle with image problems, mislabelling and stigmatisation within psychiatry (Du Plessis Reference Du Plessis, Nel and Taylor2021). The consequences of this are that patients are hampered from accessing its benefits (Krouwel Reference Krouwel, Jolly and Greenfield2017) and mental health professionals are discouraged from training in or delivering hypnosis. Health professionals often do not realise that a lot of research has gone into hypnotic interventions in recent years and, anecdotally, they often opine from points of view that are uninformed by evidence.

Definition of clinical hypnosis

The characterisation of clinical hypnosis as something that is done to patients over which they have no control – in effect, involuntary mind control – is controversial. This does not appear to be the view of contemporary practitioners of clinical hypnosis in Europe or America. The accepted definition of hypnosis has undergone various iterations over the years (Elkins Reference Elkins, Barabasz and Council2015). This effort has ensured that its definition is recognisable and widely accepted. In 2014, the Society of Psychological Hypnosis (Division 30 of the American Psychological Association) defined hypnosis as ‘a state of consciousness involving focused attention and reduced peripheral awareness characterized by an enhanced capacity for response to suggestion’ (Society of Psychological Hypnosis 2022). These are the essential components of what is called the trance state. We agree with the Society's definition but must point out that resulting therapeutic effects are often experienced by patients as involuntary and realistic (Blakemore Reference Blakemore, Oakley and Frith2003), although it requires the active engagement and cooperation of patients with the procedure and imaginal content of suggestions.

The formal induction of a trance or hypnotic state (focused relaxation), which might be called neutral hypnosis (Cardeña Reference Cardeña, Jönsson and Terhune2013), is to be differentiated from the use of therapeutic suggestion (the making of positive suggestions to produce intended beneficial effects), for example in healthcare (Phillips Reference Phillips, Price and Molyneux2022). The induction of neutral hypnosis plus the use of therapeutic suggestion together make up ‘hypnotherapy’, but an induction process and/or ‘hypnosis’ is not necessary for people to respond to positive suggestions (although neutral hypnosis does produce a small but significant increase in response) (Kirsch Reference Kirsch and Braffman2001). Therapeutic suggestion may be added to existing therapies, such as in chronic pain management, cognitive–behavioural therapy (Ramondo Reference Ramondo, Gignac and Pestell2021) and mindfulness (Olendzki Reference Olendzki, Elkins and Slonena2020), to increase effect sizes. Teaching patients self-hypnosis, which is advocated by hypnosis societies, helps them to take control of their own thought processes, emotions and behaviours. This increases their self-efficacy and participation in their own treatment (Wark Reference Wark and Kohen2002; Kohen Reference Kohen2010).

An omission from the article

What is missing from Chan et al's article is discussion of the most common uses of hypnosis and therapeutic suggestion in psychiatry. These include the management of medically unexplained symptoms (or functional disorders) and of comorbid physical and mental illnesses in adults and children (Phillips Reference Phillips, Price and Molyneux2022). These problems are often encountered in liaison psychiatry. General hospitals bring added complexity and challenges to what mental health interventions can be quickly and easily delivered, and hypnosis and therapeutic suggestion have value in this setting (Holler Reference Holler, Koranyi and Strauss2021). This value extends to the cost-effectiveness of hypnotherapeutic interventions (Montgomery Reference Montgomery, Bovbjerg and Schnur2007; Maines Reference Maines, Peruzza and Angheben2021), improvements in patients’ experience of care (Arbour Reference Arbour, Tremblay and Ogez2022) and quality of life. A systematic review and meta-analysis has found hypnosis and therapeutic suggestion to be effective in chronic pain management (Adachi Reference Adachi, Fujino and Nakae2014). In cancer care, hypnosis reduces pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue and insomnia associated with treatments (Remondes-Costa Reference Remondes-Costa, Magalhães and Martins2021; Hayat Reference Hayat, Abderrahmane and Karim2022). It has been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) as a treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (NICE 2017: recommendation 1.2.3), although mental health professionals, even those in the UK, are often unaware of this. Irritable bowel syndrome can be conceptualised as a common functional disorder that has high comorbidity with common mental disorders. To participate fully in integrated care, psychiatrists would do well to understand these interventions and participate in their delivery. The curriculum for training in child and adolescent (consultation) liaison psychiatry in Australia, for example, lists hypnosis as one of the interventions that trainees could learn to deliver (Shaw Reference Shaw, Rackley and Walker2019).

Education and training for healthcare professionals

Interventions that have been evidenced to improve healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of hypnosis and therapeutic suggestion are limited in scope. The following have been evidenced: a short online video lecture (Montgomery Reference Montgomery, Force and Dillon2019); longer, in-person, didactic educational/training sessions (Martín Reference Martín, Capafons and Espejo2010; Carvello Reference Carvello, Lupo and Muro2021; Arbour Reference Arbour, Tremblay and Ogez2022); a training programme involving patients (Aramideh Reference Aramideh, Ogez and Mizrahi2020) and their families (Ogez Reference Ogez, Aramideh and Mizrahi2021); and comprehensive training with ongoing supervision and continuing education (McKernan Reference McKernan, Finn and Patterson2020). Expanding awareness of hypnosis and therapeutic suggestion among healthcare professionals and their students would be of benefit to a wide range of patients. Although improved awareness may not necessarily translate into practice, it would be a good starting point.

Hypnosis practitioners and societies should focus on educating the wider healthcare community about the benefits of hypnosis and encourage its incorporation into clinical guidelines (Box 1). For too long, the evidence of the benefits of hypnosis continues to circulate mainly within highly specialised communities of practice, robbing other health professionals of this enlightenment. For mental health services, the question that needs consideration is: For whom are hypnosis and therapeutic suggestion effective and how can we make these interventions available to those patients who would benefit?

BOX 1 Sources of information

For professionals

  • British Society of Clinical and Academic Hypnosis – This is the professional body of health professionals in England, Wales and Northern Ireland who utilise hypnosis in healthcare. It promotes safe and responsible practice, aims to educate both professionals and the public about hypnosis and its use, and encourages research, audit and publication on the subject (www.bscah.com).

  • British Society of Medical and Dental Hypnosis (Scotland) – This organisation in Scotland aims to promote the safe and responsible use of hypnosis in medicine and dentistry. It aims to educate healthcare workers and the public about hypnosis and its uses and to advance scientific research, education and standards of practice in hypnosis (www.bsmdhscotland.com).

  • Hypnosis and Psychosomatic Section, the Royal Society of Medicine – Promotes knowledge and understanding of hypnosis and psychosomatic medicine, through continuous professional development activities (www.rsm.ac.uk/sections/hypnosis-and-psychosomatic-medicine-section).

For patients

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Carol McDaniel (consultant psychiatrist) and the RCPsych International Peer Group: Drs Shangobiyi (UK), Njoku (UK), Awani (Canada), Datubo (UK) and Odeyale (UK) for their initial comments on this commentary. We are grateful to the University of Western Ontario Library for access to papers used in forming our opinions.

Author contributions

Both authors contributed to the conception and design of this work and to its drafting, and gave final approval of the version published. They agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of interest

I.U. is a member of the BJPsych Advances editorial board and did not take part in the review or decision-making process of this paper. I.U. is a member of the British Society of Clinical and Academic Hypnosis (BSCAH). Views expressed are not necessarily those of the BSCAH.

Footnotes

Commentary on… Update on hypnotherapy for psychiatrists. See this issue.

References

Adachi, T, Fujino, H, Nakae, A, et al (2014) A meta-analysis of hypnosis for chronic pain problems: a comparison between hypnosis, standard care, and other psychological interventions. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 62: 128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aramideh, J, Ogez, D, Mizrahi, T, et al (2020) Do professionals change their communication behaviours following a training in hypnosis-derived communication? A feasibility study in pediatric oncology. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 52: 102426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbour, C, Tremblay, M, Ogez, D, et al (2022) Feasibility and acceptability of hypnosis-derived communication administered by trained nurses to improve patient well-being during outpatient chemotherapy: a pilot-controlled trial. Supportive Care in Cancer, 30: 765–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, S, Oakley, D, Frith, C (2003) Delusions of alien control in the normal brain. Neuropsychologia, 41: 1058–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardeña, E, Jönsson, P, Terhune, DB, et al (2013) The neurophenomenology of neutral hypnosis. Cortex, 49: 375–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvello, M, Lupo, R, Muro, M, et al (2021) Nurse's knowledge and perceptions on communicative hypnosis: an observational study. Acta Biomedica, 92 (suppl 2): e2021027.Google ScholarPubMed
Chan, N, Zhang, Z, Yin, G, et al (2022) Update on hypnotherapy for psychiatrists. BJPsych Advances, this issue.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, C, Nel, L, Taylor, H (2021) You're going to do what? Patients’ myths regarding hypnotherapy as described by South African psychologists. Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science, 55: 527–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, GR, Barabasz, AF, Council, JR, et al (2015) Advancing research and practice: the revised APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 63(1): 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayat, S, Abderrahmane, A, Karim, F (2022) The effect of hypnosis on the intensity of pain and anxiety in cancer patients: a systematic review of controlled experimental trials. Cancer Investigation, 40: 235–53.Google Scholar
Holler, M, Koranyi, S, Strauss, B, et al (2021) Efficacy of hypnosis in adults undergoing surgical procedures: a meta-analytic update. Clinical Psychology Review, 85: 102001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirsch, I, Braffman, W (2001) Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10: 5761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohen, DP (2010) Long-term follow-up of self-hypnosis training for recurrent headaches: what the children say. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 58: 417–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krouwel, M, Jolly, K, Greenfield, S (2017) What the public think about hypnosis and hypnotherapy: a narrative review of literature covering opinions and attitudes of the general public 1996–2016. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 32: 7584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maines, M, Peruzza, F, Angheben, C, et al (2021) Hypnotic communication in interventional electrophysiology procedures in the COVID-19 period. Heart and Mind, 5: 40–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín, M, Capafons, A, Espejo, B, et al (2010) Impact of a lecture about empirical bases of hypnosis on beliefs and attitudes toward hypnosis among Cuban health professionals. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 58: 476–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKernan, LC, Finn, MTM, Patterson, DR, et al (2020) Clinical hypnosis for chronic pain in outpatient integrative medicine: an implementation and training model. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 26: 107–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, GH, Bovbjerg, DH, Schnur, JB, et al (2007) A randomized clinical trial of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 99: 1304–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, GH, Force, J, Dillon, MJ, et al (2019) The effect of an online lecture on psychosocial cancer care providers’ attitudes about hypnosis. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6: 320–8.Google ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2017) Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Adults: Diagnosis and Management (Clinical Guideline CG61). NICE.Google Scholar
Ogez, D, Aramideh, J, Mizrahi, T, et al (2021) Does practising hypnosis-derived communication techniques by oncology nurses translate into reduced pain and distress in their patients? An exploratory study. British Journal of Pain, 15: 147–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olendzki, N, Elkins, GR, Slonena, E, et al (2020) Mindful hypnotherapy to reduce stress and increase mindfulness: a randomized controlled pilot study. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 68: 151–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, W, Price, J, Molyneux, P, et al (2022) Hypnosis. Practical Neurology, 22: 42–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramondo, N, Gignac, GE, Pestell, CF, et al (2021) Clinical hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive behavior therapy: an updated meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 69: 169202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Remondes-Costa, S, Magalhães, F, Martins, I, et al (2021) Application of hypnosis in psychoncology: a review of the literature. Análise Psicológica, 39: 263–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, RJ, Rackley, S, Walker, A, et al (2019) Core competencies for pediatric consultation-liaison psychiatry in child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship training. Psychosomatics, 60: 444–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Society of Psychological Hypnosis (2022) About the Society of Psychological Hypnosis: Definition and Description of Hypnosis. American Psychological Association (https://www.apadivisions.org/division-30/about).Google Scholar
Varga, K (2013) Suggestive techniques connected to medical interventions. Interventional Medicine & Applied Science, 5: 95100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wark, DM, Kohen, DP (2002) A spiral curriculum for hypnosis training. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 45: 119–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.