Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:14:11.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time budgets and habitat use of White-naped Cranes Grus vipio in the Ulz river valley, north-eastern Mongolia during the breeding season

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2007

Ute Bradter*
Affiliation:
Institute of Avian Research, An der Vogelwarte 21, 26386 Wilhelmshaven, Germany
Sundev Gombobaatar
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, National University of Mongolia, P. O. Box 537, Ulaanbaatar 210646A, Mongolia
Chuluunbaatar Uuganbayar
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, National University of Mongolia, P. O. Box 537, Ulaanbaatar 210646A, Mongolia
Tracy E. Grazia
Affiliation:
Mississippi Sandhill Crane National Wildlife Refuge, 7200 Crane Lane, Gautier, MS 39553, U.S.A.
Klaus-Michael Exo
Affiliation:
Institute of Avian Research, An der Vogelwarte 21, 26386 Wilhelmshaven, Germany
*
*Author for correspondence. e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Habitat loss and degradation are critical threats for the globally threatened White-naped Crane Grus vipio. We estimated the size of the area used per day and the time budgets of parental and non-parental White-naped Crane pairs in north-eastern Mongolia during 2000 and 2001. Six parental crane pairs used an area of 11–155 ha per day. The maximum distance of a focal parental crane from the roosting-site was 3,030 m. Habitat conservation measures for breeding White-naped Cranes need to be targeted to within at least 3 km of the roosting-site or nest-site. Parental cranes spent 79.6 ± 4.8% of the daylight period foraging and had reduced preening and resting behaviour to 4.4 ± 1.9%. Pairs without juveniles showed a pronounced period of resting and preening behaviour during midday, which was absent in parental cranes. This indicates that parental cranes may be time-stressed. We conclude that increases in feeding-related activities (e.g. caused by a decrease in food availability) are likely to be at the expense of parental vigilance. Conversely, increases in vigilance (due to e.g. increased disturbance) may have a negative impact on feeding-related activities. Both increases can potentially negatively affect reproductive success in this Vulnerable species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 2007