Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-8l2sj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:03:54.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reintroduction and restocking: guidelines for bird recovery programmes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Jeffrey M. Black
Jeffrey M. Black
Affiliation:
The Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire GL2 7BT, U.K.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Reintroduction and restocking programmes are conservation tools which may be employed when a wild population is otherwise beyond recovery. The decision to undertake such programmes should be based on a series of “feasibility” assessments (e.g. the bird's ecology, current threats, suitability of available stock and regional human socioeconomic implications). Releases should only take place when the habitat is capable of sustaining a viable population and the original constraining factors no longer operate. Releasing birds into near-saturated areas may be harmful and should be avoided. Local, national and international support for the programme should be secured. The birds should be of optimal quality in terms of behaviour, health and genetics and they should be reared, released and monitoring according to sound strategies and criteria. Assessment and adjustments of the programme should periodically be made after initial releases. Documentation of the programme should be circulated and/or published.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 329 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1991

References

Barclay, J. H and Cade, T. J. (1983) Restoration of the peregrine falcon in the eastern United States. Bird Conservation 1: 3–37.Google Scholar
Black, J. M., Duvall, F., Hoshide, H., Medeiros, J., Natividad Hodges, C., Santos, N. and Telfer, T. (in press) The current status of the Hawaiian goose Branta sandvicensis and its recovery programme. Wildfowl 42.Google Scholar
Boitani, L. (1976) Proceedings of the seminar, Re-introductions: techniques and ethics. Pp.22–23 in U.K. Committee for International Nature Conservation, eds. Wildlife introductions to Great Britain: some policy implications for nature conservation (1979). Unpublished.Google Scholar
Cade, T. J., Enderson, J. H., Thelander, C. G. and Clayton, M. W. (1988) Peregrine falcon populations: their management and recovery. Boise, Idaho: The Peregrine Fund, Inc.Google Scholar
Gipps, J. H. W. (1991) Beyond captive breeding: re-introducing endangered mammals to the wild. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN (1987) The IUCN position statement on translocation of living organisms: introductions, re-introductions and re-stocking. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, unpublished.Google Scholar
Perrins, C. M., Lebreton, J.-D. and Hirons, G. J. M., eds. (1991) Bird population studies: relevance to conservation and management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. M. and Carpenter, J. W. (1987) Release of captive-reared or translocated endangered birds: what do we need to know? Auk 104: 544–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seal, U. S., Ballou, J. D. and Padua, C. V. (1990) Criteria for translocation/re-introduction of lion tamarin. In: Leontopithecus: population viability analysis. IUCN Captive Breeding Specialist Group, unpublished.Google Scholar
Soulé, M. E. (1987) Viable populations for conservation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulé, M. E. and Wilcox, B. A. (1980) Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological approach. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Temple, S. A., ed. (1978) Endangered birds: management techniques for preserving threatened species. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar