No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Density and habitat associations of the Altamira Yellowthroat Geothlypis flavovelata in Veracruz, Mexico: an endemic vulnerable species
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 October 2019
Summary
The Altamira Yellowthroat Geothlypis flavovelata is endemic to north-eastern Mexico, with a restricted distribution due to the spatial arrangement of its major habitat: wetlands. Given the lack of information regarding this vulnerable and endemic landbird, here we describe and analyse the sites where we recorded it in Northern Veracruz, as well as its population density, and natural history information. Our results show that the average density of this endemic yellowthroat is 1.006 ind/ha, with more individuals recorded in Tecolutla when compared to Tuxpan. We found a strong association between the Altamira Yellowthroat and southern cat-tail Typha domingensis, although we found scenarios under which the presence of the cat-tail was not a determinant of Altamira Yellowthroat presence. In light of the strong anthropogenic pressures on wetlands in the region, the Altamira Yellowthroat has become highly vulnerable. Thus, if we aim to preserve this endemic species, together with other wetland-dependent species, it is crucial to moderate –and even stop– human pressures on these ecosystems and mitigate past damages.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © BirdLife International, 2019
References
Amat, J. A. and Green, A. J. (2010) Waterbirds as bioindicators of environmental conditions. Pp. 45–52 in Hurford, C., Schneider, M. and Cowx, I., eds. Conservation monitoring in freshwater habitats. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9278-7_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOU (American Ornithologists’ Union). (2019) Check-list of North American birds. Washington, DC: American Ornithologists’ Union. Downloaded from http://checklist.aou.org on 02/22/2019Google Scholar
Ayala-Pérez, V., Arce, N. and Carmona, R. (2013) Distribución espacio-temporal de aves acuáticas invernantes en la Ciénega de Tláhuac, planicie lacustre de Chalco, México. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 84: 327–337.10.7550/rmb.28632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., Hill, D. A. and Mustoe, S. (2000) Bird census techniques. San Diego, California: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2019) Species factsheet: Geothlypis flavovelata. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 02/22/2019.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2016) Quiscalus palustris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22724314A94859972. Downloaded from http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22724314A94859972.en. on 02/22/2019.Google Scholar
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P. and Laake, J. L. (1993) Distance sampling: Estimating abundance of biological populations . London, UK: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Curson, J. (2019) Altamira Yellowthroat (Geothlypis flavovelata) in Del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D. A. and de Juana, E., E., eds. Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions. https://www.hbw.com/species/altamira-yellowthroat-geothlypis-flavovelataGoogle Scholar
Davidson, N. and Rothwell, P. (1993) Human disturbance to waterfowl on estuaries: conservation and coastal management implications of current knowledge. Pp. 97–106 in Davidson, N. and Rothwell, P., eds. Disturbance to waterfowl on estuaries. Bedfordshire, UK: Wader Study Group Bulletin.Google Scholar
de Gortari-Ludlow, N., Espinosa-Reyes, G., Flores-Rivas, J., Salgado-Ortiz, J. and Chapa-Vargas, L. (2015) Threats, conservation actions, and research within 78 Mexican non-coastal protected wetlands. J. Nat. Conserv. 23: 73–79.10.1016/j.jnc.2014.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación) (2010) Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental - especies nativas de México y de flora y fauna silvestres - categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio - lista de especies en riesgo. México, D. F.: Diario Oficial de la Federación.Google Scholar
Ellis, E. A. and Martínez-Bello, M. (2010) Vegetación y uso de suelo de Veracruz. Pp. 203–226 in Badillo, G. Benítez and Rodríguez, C. Welsh, coord. Atlas del patrimonio natural, histórico y cultural del estado de Veracruz. Tomo 1, Patrimonio Natural. Xalapa, Veracruz: Comisión para la Conmemoración del Bicentenario de la Independencia Nacional y del Centenario de la Revolución Mexicana. Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz. Universidad VeracruzanaGoogle Scholar
Escalante, P., Márquez-Valdelamar, L., de la Torre, P., Laclette, J. P. and Klicka, J. (2009) Evolutionary history of a prominent North American warbler clade: The Oporornis-Geothlypis complex. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 53: 668–678.10.1016/j.ympev.2009.07.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escalante-Pliego, P. (2010a) Ficha técnica de Geothlypis flavovelata. Fichas sobre las especies de aves incluidas en Proyecto de Norma Oficial Mexicana PROY-NOM-059-ECOL-2000. Parte 1. Instituto de Biología, UNAM. Bases de datos SNIB-CONABIO. Proyecto No. W007. México, D.F.Google Scholar
Escalante-Pliego, P. (2010b) Ficha técnica de Geothlypis speciosa. Fichas sobre las especies de aves incluidas en Proyecto de Norma Oficial Mexicana PROY-NOM-059-ECOL-2000. Parte 1. Instituto de Biología, UNAM. Bases de datos SNIB-CONABIO. Proyecto No. W007. México, D.F.Google Scholar
Forcino, F. L., Leighton, L. R., Twerdy, P. and Cahill, J. F. (2015) Reexamining sample size requirements for multivariate, abundance-based community research: when resources are limited, the research does not have to be. PLoS ONE 10: e0128379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, B. (1989) Finding the Altamira Yellowthroat (Geothlypis flavovelata) in Nacimiento, Tamaulipas. Aves Mexicanas 2: 2.Google Scholar
Howell, S. N. G. and Webb, S. (1995) A guide to the birds of Mexico and Northern Central America. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
INEGI (2008) Manual de características edafológicas, fisiográficas, climáticas e hidrográficas de México. Dirección de Capacitación INEGI, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. Accessed 20 september 2015 from: http://www.inegi.org.mx/inegi/spc/doc/INTERNET/1-GEOGRAFIADEMEXICO/MANUAL_CARAC_EDA_FIS_VS_ENERO_29_2008.pdfGoogle Scholar
IUCN (2019) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded from www.iucnredlist.org on 02/22/2019.Google Scholar
Kattan, G. H., Álvarez-López, H. and Giraldo, M. (1994) Forest fragmentation and bird extinctions: San Antonio eighty years later. Conserv. Biol. 8: 138–146.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010138.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landgrave, R. and Moreno-Casasola, P. (2012) Evaluación cuantitativa de la pérdida de humedales en México. Investig. Amb. 4: 19–35.Google Scholar
López-Portillo, J., Martínez, M. L., Hesp, P., Hernández, J. R., Méndez-Linares, A. P., Vásquez-Reyes, V., Gómez-Aguilar, I. R., Jiménez-Orocio, O. and Gachuz Delgado, S. L. (2011) Atlas de las costas de Veracruz. Manglares y Dunas. Colección Veracruz Siglo XX. Secretaría de Educación del Estado de Veracruz, Universidad Veracruzana.Google Scholar
López-Saut, E. G., Rodríguez-Estrella, R. and Chávez-Ramírez, F. (2014) ¿Son las grullas indicadoras de la riqueza de especies de aves acuáticas en humedales en el Altiplano Mexicano? Acta Zool. Mex. (n.s.) 30: 268–287.Google Scholar
Lot, A. (2004) Flora y vegetación de los humedales de agua dulce en la Zona Costera del Golfo de México. Pp. 521–539 in Caso, M., Pisanty, I. and Ezcurra, E., eds. Diagnóstico Ambiental del Golfo de México, Tomo I. México, D. F.: Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Instituto de Ecología A. C., Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies.Google Scholar
Mistry, J., Berardi, A. and Simpson, M. (2008) Birds as indicators of wetland status and change in the North Rupununi, Guyana. Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 2383–2409.10.1007/s10531-008-9388-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno-Casasola, B. P. and López, R. H. (2009) Muestreo y análisis de la vegetación de los humedales. Pp. 145–168 in Moreno-Casasola, P. and Warner, B. G., eds. Breviario para describir, observar y manejar humedales. Serie Costa Sustentable No. 1. RAMSAR, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., CONANP, US Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, H. H., Szoecs, E. and Wagner, H. (2016) vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.4-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=veganGoogle Scholar
Palacios, E. and Galindo-Espinosa, D. (2011) Plan de acción para la conservación de la Mascarita Peninsular (Geothlypis beldingi) y sus hábitats en Baja California Sur, México. La Paz, Baja California Sur. Pronatura Noroeste, A.C., y Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (Unidad La Paz).Google Scholar
Pérez-Arteaga, A., Gaston, K. J. and Kershaw, M. (2002) Undesignated sites in Mexico qualifying as wetlands of international importance. Biol. Conserv. 107: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Ramírez-Bastida, P., Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G. and Peterson, A. T. (2008) Aquatic bird distributions in Mexico: designing conservation approaches quantitatively. Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 2525–2558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Estrella, R, Rubio, D. L., Pineda, D. B. E. and Blanco, G. (1999) Belding’s Yellowthroat: current status, habitat preferences and threats in oases of Baja California, México. Anim. Conserv. 2: 770–784.10.1111/j.1469-1795.1999.tb00052.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Ruiz, E. R. and Banda-Valdez, A. (2015) Guía de Aves Reserva de la Biosfera El Cielo. Ciudad Victoria: Secretaría de Desarrollo Urbano y Medio Ambiente del Gobierno del Estado de Tamaulipas.Google Scholar
SAGARPA (Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural) (2019) Datos abiertos – Estadística de Producción Agrícola. Downloaded from http://infosiap.siap.gob.mx/gobmx/datosAbiertos.php on 07/22/2019.Google Scholar
SEMARNAT (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales) (2014) Política Nacional de Humedales. México, D.F.: SEMARNAT. CONANP.Google Scholar
Thomas, L., Laake, J., Rexstad, E., Strindberg, S., Marques, F., Buckland, S., Borchers, D., Anderson, D., Burnham, K., Burt, M., Hedley, S., Pollard, J., Bishop, J. and Marques, T. (2009) Distance 6.0. Release 1. United Kingdom: University of St. Andrews, Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. C. (1994) Revision of the Mexican Species of Cyperus (Cyperaceae) Syst. Bot. Monogr. 43: 1–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wongsriphuek, C., Dugger, D. B. and Bartuszevige, M. A. (2008) Dispersal of wetland plant seed by mallards: influence of gut passage on recovery, retention, and germination. Wetlands 28: 290–299.10.1672/07-101.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W. W. and Ma, J. Z. (2011) Waterbirds as bioindicators of wetland heavy metal pollution. Proc. Environ. Sci. 10: 2769–2774.10.1016/j.proenv.2011.09.429CrossRefGoogle Scholar