Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:56:15.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Action Plans: do they help conservation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Philip. J. K. McGowan ,
Peter. J. Garson  and
John. P. Carroll
Philip. J. K. McGowan
Affiliation:
Ecoscope Applied Ecologists, 9 Bennell Court, Comberton, Cambridge CB3 jDS, U.K.
Peter. J. Garson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NEi 7RU, U.K.
John. P. Carroll
Affiliation:
D. B. Warnell School of Forest Resources, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2152, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Introduction

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

IUCN (The World Conservation Union) published its first Action Plan more than a decade ago (Oates 1986). Many taxon-specific Specialist Groups working under the auspices of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) have since produced such documents, some of which are now in their second editions (e.g. Reeves and Leatherwood 1994). As we know only too well ourselves, Action Plans take a great deal of time and effort to compile, but what evidence is there to show that they are effective in achieving their prime objective of increasing the amount and quality of work that gets done to save threatened species from extinction?

Type
Opinion
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 8 , Issue 4: Special Issue: International Galliformes Symposium , December 1998 , pp. 317 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1998

References

Collar, N. (1994) Red Data Books, Action Plans, and the need for site specific synthesis. Species 21/22:132–133.Google Scholar
Collar, N. J., Crosby, M. J. and Stattersfield, A. J. (1994) Birds to watch 2: the world list of threatened birds. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International (BirdLife Conservation Series 4).Google Scholar
Dekker, R. W. R. J. and McGowan, P. J. K. (1995) Megapodes. An Action Plan for their conservation 1995–99. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Eames, J.E., Robson, C.R., Nguyen, Cu, and Truong, Van La (1992) Forest bird surveys in Vietnam. Cambridge, U.K.: ICBP (Study Report No. 51).Google Scholar
Gimenez-Dixon, M. and Stuart, S. (1993) Action Plans for species conservation, and evaluation of their effectiveness. Species 20: 6–10.Google Scholar
Hágsater, E. and Dumont, V. (1996) Orchids: status survey and conservation Action Plan. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Mace, G. M. and Lande, R. (1991) Assessing extinction threats: towards a re-evaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conserv. Biol. 5: 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, P. J. K. and Garson, P. J. (1995) Pheasants. Status survey and conservation Action Plan 1995–1999. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
McGowan, P. J. K., Dowell, S. D., Carroll, J. P. and Aebischer, N. J. (1995) Partridges, quails, francolins, snowcocks, and guineafowl. Status survey and conservation Action Plan 1995–1999. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
McGowan, P., Dekker, R. W. R. J., Dowell, S. and Garson, P. (1998) The making of conservation Action Plans for the Galliformes. Bird Conserv. lnternatn. 8: 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, N. W. (1997) Dragonflies: status survey and conservation Action Plan. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Oates, J. F. (1986) Action Plan for African primate conservation 1986–90. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Reeves, R. R. and Leatherwood, S. (1994) Dolphins, porpoises, and whales: 1994.-97 Action Plan for the conservation of cetaceans. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Zhang, Zheng-wang (1995) Brown Eared-pheasant project report. WPA News 49: 14–16.Google Scholar