Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:03:08.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Race and Genetics: Attempts to Define the Relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2007

Duana Fullwiley
Duana Fullwiley
Affiliation:
Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Many researchers working in the field of human genetics in the United States have been caught between two seemingly competing messages with regard to racial categories and genetic difference. As the human genome was mapped in 2000, Francis Collins, the head of the publicly funded project, together with his privately funded rival, announced that humans were 99.9 percent the same at the level of their genome. That same year, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) began a research program on pharmacogenetics that would exploit the .01 percent of human genetic difference, increasingly understood in racial terms, to advance the field of pharmacy. First, this article addresses Collins’ summary of what he called the ‘vigorous debate’ on the relationship between race and genetics in the open-access special issue of Nature Genetics entitled ‘Genetics for the Human Race’ in 2004. Second, it examines the most vexed (if not always openly stated) issue at stake in the debate: that many geneticists today work with the assumption that human biology differs by race as it is conceived through American census categories. It then presents interviews with researchers in two collaborating US laboratories who collect and organize DNA by American notions of ‘race/ethnicity’ and assume that US race categories of classification largely traduce human biogenetic difference. It concludes that race is a practical and conceptual tool whose utility and function is often taken for granted rather than rigorously assessed and that ‘rational medicine’ cannot precede a rational approach to addressing the nature of racial disparities, difference and inequality in health and society more broadly.

Keywords

geneticsracerational medicine
Type
Articles
Information
BioSocieties , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 221 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © London School of Economics and Political Science 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braun, L. (2002). Race, ethnicity, and health: Can genetics explain disparities? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 45, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchard, E.G., Ziv, E., Coyle, N., Gomez, S.L., Tang, H., Karter, A.J. et al. (2003). The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice. New England Medical Journal, 348, 1170–1175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, F.S. (2004). What we do and don’t know about ‘race’, ‘ethnicity’, genetics and health at the dawn of the genome era. Nature Genetics Supplement, 36, S13–S15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.S., Kaufman, J.S., & Ward, R. (2003). Race and genomics. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 1166–1170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duster, T. (2001). The sociology of science and the revolution in molecular biology. In Blau, J.R. (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to sociology, 213–226. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Editorial (2000). Census, race and science. Nature Genetics, 24, 97–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, W.E., & Relling, M. (1999). Pharmacogenetics: Translating functional genomics into rational therapeutics. Science Magazine, 286, 487–491.Google ScholarPubMed
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2004). Refashioning race: DNA and the politics of health care. Differences, 15, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, M.W., & Sharp, R.R. (2002) Race, ethnicity, and genomics: Social classifications as proxies of biological heterogeneity. Genome Research, 12, 844–850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fullwiley, D. (2007). The molecularization of race: Institutionalizing human difference in pharmacogenetics practice. Science as Culture, 16, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilroy, P. (2000). Against race: Imagining political culture beyond the color line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. Premack (Eds), Causal cognition: An interdisciplinary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. (2003). Getting the numbers right: Statistical mischief and racial profiling in heart failure research. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, J. (forthcoming). Patenting race in a genomic age. In Koenig, B. and Soo-Jin Lee, S. (Eds), Revisiting race in a genomic age. Newark: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, J. (2003). African-American population biobank proposed. Science Magazine, 300, 1485.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, J., & Bean, F.D. (2004). America’s changing color lines: Immigration, race/ethnicity, and multiracial identification. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 221–242.Google Scholar
Lee, S.S.J., Mountain, J., & Koenig, B.A. (2001). The meanings of ‘race’ in the new genomics: Implications for health disparities research. Yale Journal of Health Policy and Ethics, 1, 33–75.Google Scholar
National Institute for General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) (2000). Medicines for You. URL (accessed May 2004): www.nigms.nih.gov/funding/meIoryou.htmlGoogle Scholar
Nature Genetics Editorial (2002). Census, race, and science. Nature Genetics, 24, 97–98.Google Scholar
Ossario, P., & Duster, T. (2005). Race and genetics: Controversies in biomedical, behavioral, and forensic sciences. American Psychologist, 60, 115–128.Google Scholar
Pharmacogenetics Research Network (PGRN) (2002). Abstracts of Funded Supplements to the Pharmacogenetics Research Network for Health Disparities. URL (accessed May 2004): www.nigms.nih.gov/ pharmacogenetics/prnsupp_abstracts.htmlGoogle Scholar
Risch, N., Buchard, E.G., Ziv, E., & Tang, H. (2002). Categorization of humans in biomedical research: Genes, race and disease. Genome Biology, 3, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, M. (1947/1964). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wellner, A.S. (2003). Bridging the gap. Forecast, February, 2.Google Scholar
White House, Office of the Press Secretary (2000). Remarks by the President, Prime Minister Tony Blair of England, Dr Francis Collins, Director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, and Dr Craig Venter, President and Chief Scientific Officer, Celera Genomics Corporation, On the Completion of the First Survey of the Entire Human Genome Project. URL (accessed May 2004): clinton3.nara.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/00628_2.htmlGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J.F., Weale, M.E., Smith, A.C., Gratrix, F., Fletcher, B., Thomas, M.G. et al. (2001). Population genetic structure of variable drug response. Nature Genetics, 29, 265–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed