Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-25T06:44:00.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Forensic Use of Bioinformation: A Review of Responses to the Nuffield Report, published in BioSocieties, Volume 3(1)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

Bronwyn Parry*
Bronwyn Parry*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NSUK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
BioSocieties , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 217 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © London School of Economics and Political Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gammell, C., & Edwards, R. (2008). Call for DNA database after Mark Dixie jailed.The Telegraph, 26 February.Google Scholar
Falconer, C. (Minister of State, the Home Office) (2003) Letter to the Chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, 25 March. URL: www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200203/jtselect/jtrights/118/3052209.htmGoogle Scholar
Radnofsky, L. (2008). Bowman detective calls for compulsory DNA register. The Guardian, 22 February.Google Scholar
Townsend, M., & Asthana, A. (2008a). Put young children on DNA list, urge police. The Observer, 16 March.Google Scholar
Townsend, M., & Asthana, A. (2008b). How two brutal killers fuelled the DNA debate. The Observer, 24 February.Google Scholar