Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:50:48.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Practice of Genetic Counselling—A Comparative Approach to Understanding Genetic Counselling in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2009

Suli Sui
Suli Sui
Affiliation:
Amsterdam School of Social Science Research, Amsterdam University, Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article provides an empirical account of the application of genetic counselling in China based on interviews, clinical observation and literature research during a field study from September 2008 to February 2009, carried out mainly in China and partly in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Making comparisons with the situation in the UK and in Hong Kong, and from a social science perspective, the article outlines the situation of genetic counselling in China, discussing the qualifications for genetic counselling providers, the model of genetic clinical services, and their governance and supervision in Chinese social contexts. The article discusses Chinese practitioners’ understanding of and practice around ethical issues such as non-directiveness, informed choice and decision-making, and explores the extent to which this reflects the administrative, political and socio-economic environments in Chinese society. The article argues that the current state of genetic counselling in China arises mainly from its executive governance, non-professional genetic counselling provision, economic conditions and the lack of full healthcare coverage.

Keywords

Clinical GeneticistsGenetic CounsellingGenetic CounsellorGovernanceNon-directivenessSocial Contexts
Type
Articles
Information
BioSocieties , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 391 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © London School of Economics and Political Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ad Hoc Committee on Genetic Counselling (1975). Report to the American Society of Human Genetics. American Journal of Human Genetics, 27, 240–242.Google Scholar
AGNC (Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors) (2008a). Code of ethics. URL (accessed October 2009): http://www.agnc.org.uk/About%20us/codeofethics.htmGoogle Scholar
AGNC (Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors) (2008b). Training to be a genetic counsellor. URL (accessed October 2009): http://www.agnc.org.uk/howtobecomeaGC.htmGoogle Scholar
Baker, D.L., Schuette, J.L., & Uhlmann, W.R. (1998). A guide to genetic counseling. New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
Biesecker, B.B. (2001). Goals of genetic counseling. Clinical Genetics, 60, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, A. (1991). Is non-directive genetic counselling possible? Lancet, 335, 1145–1147.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2006). 25 years of clinical genetic services. Hong Kong: Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, PRC.Google Scholar
Dice, L.R. (1952). Heredity clinics: Their value for public service and for research. American Journal of Human Genetics, 4(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Fine, B.A. (1993). The evolution of nondirectiveness in genetic counselling and implications of the human genome project. In Bartels, D.M., Leroy, B.S., & Caplan, A.L. (Eds), Prescribing our future: ethical challenges in genetic counselling. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harper, P.S. (2004). Practical genetic counselling, 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Herndon, C.N. (1955). Heredity counselling. Eugenics Quarterly, 2(2), 83–89.Google Scholar
Hsia, Y.E. (1977). Approaches to the appraisal of genetic counseling. In Lubs, H.A., & Cruz, F. (Eds). Genetic Counseling. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Jones, M., & Salter, B. (2003). The governance of human genetics: Policy discourse and constructions of public trust. New Genetics and Society, 22, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, J., & Fang, J. (2002). Privatization of health services and the reproductive health of rural Chinese women. Reproductive Health Matters, 10(20), 108–116.Google Scholar
Liu, M. (2007). Five hospitals got permission for prenatal genetic testing in Beijing (Beijng wu jia yiyuan huoxu shishi chanqian yichuan jiance). Beijing Chenbao, 10 July.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (2001). Genetic governance: The risks, oversight and regulation of genetic databases in the UK. New Genetics and Society, 20(2), 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOH (Ministry of Health) (2003); Guideline of prenatal diagnosis technology. Beijing: MOH.Google Scholar
Murray, T.H. (1996). The worth of a child. Berkeley: U California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, S. (1955). Counselling in medical genetics. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.Google Scholar
Rogers, C.R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself. Woodstock, Oxon: Princeton UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, M., Ghosh, A., & Chan, F.Y. (1991). Genetic counselling in prenatal diagnosis. Journal of the Hong Kong Medical Association, 43(2), 75–77.Google Scholar
Tibben, A., & Duivebvoorden, H.J. (1994). Psychological effects of presymptomatic testing for Huntington’s disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 56, 526–532.Google Scholar
Weil, J. (2003). Psychological genetic counselling in the post-nondirective era: A point of view. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12(3), 199–211.Google Scholar
Xia, J.H., & Wu, L.Q. (2003). Genetic counselling and prenatal genetic diagnosis. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (zhonghua fuchan zazhi), 8(38), 474–477.Google Scholar
Xiangya Hospital, Prenatal Diagnosis Centre (2008). Plan of the prenatal diagnosis training course. URL (accessed October 2009): http://www.cnlmg.com/cn/yanxianni.asp?id=102Google Scholar