Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:09:41.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blue-green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

Stefan Helmreich
Stefan Helmreich
Affiliation:
Anthropology Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge MA 02139-4307,USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Examining the rise and fall of a public–private marine biotechnological enterprise in Hawaii, this article analyses how promises to make products and profits from marine microbes in archipelagic waters drew upon peculiarly American sentiments about the sea as a politically uncontested treasure-chest of biodiversity. I argue that attention to the material process by which lab and legal instruments are calibrated to one another to generate biotech exchange-value must be joined by consideration of how scientists and their interlocutors imagine the meaning of biology—as discipline and as corporeal substance and process. Without such symbolic analysis, theorizations of biocapital remain incomplete. To discuss the genre of capitalism evidenced in marine biotechnological endeavors in Hawaii, I develop the concept of blue-green capitalism, where blue stands for a vision of the freedom of the open ocean and for speculative sky-high promise, and green for belief in ecological sustainability as well as biological fecundity. I show that this vision, dominant in industry–university settings, ran into direct conflict with Native Hawaiian legal epistemologies of the sea.

Keywords

biocapitalbiodiversitybioprospectingHawaiimarine biotechnologyoceans
Type
Articles
Information
BioSocieties , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 287 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © London School of Economics and Political Science 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life, trans. Heller-Roazen, D.Stanford, CA: Stanford UP.Google Scholar
Aristotle., (1963 [c. 350 bce]). The politics, trans. Jowett, B.Clarendon: Oxford.Google Scholar
Ball, P.(2001). Life’s matrix: A biography of water. Berkeley: U California Press.Google Scholar
Casarino, C. (2002). Modernity at sea: Melville, Marx, Conrad in crisis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Collier, S., & Ong, A. (Eds) (2005). Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Colwell, R. (1984). The industrial potential of marine biotechnology. Oceanus, 27, 3–12.Google Scholar
Connery, C. (1995). The oceanic feeling and the regional imaginary. In Wilson, R., & W., Dissanayake (Eds), Global/local: Cultural production and the transnational imaginary, 284–311. Durham, NC: Duke UP.Google Scholar
Desmond, J. (1999). Staging tourism: Bodies on display from Waikiki to Sea World. Chicago: U Chicago Press.Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, B. (2006). Globalizations. Theory, Culture & Society, 23, 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Featherstone, M.(2006). Genealogies of the global. Theory, Culture & Society, 23, 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortun, M. (2002). The Human Genome Project: Past, present, and future anterior. In Garland, E.A. & MacLeod, R.M. (Eds), Science, history, and social activism: A tribute to Everett Mendelsohn, 339–362. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (2003). Ethical biocapital. In Franklin, S. & Lock, M.(Eds), Remaking life and death: Toward an anthropology of the biosciences, 97–127. Santa Fe: SAR Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (2007). Dolly mixtures: The remaking of genealogy. Durham, NC: Duke UP.Google Scholar
Franklin, S., & Lock, M. (2003). Animation and cessation. In Franklin, S.& Lock, M.(Eds), Remaking life and death: Toward an anthropology of the biosciences, 3–22. Santa Fe: SAR Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, S., & Ragoné, H. (1998). Introduction. In Franklin, S. & Ragoné, H. (Eds), Reproducing reproduction: Kinship, power, and technological innovation, 1–14. Philadelphia: U Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Harris, O., & Young, K. (1981). Engendered structures: Some problems in the analysis of reproduction. In Kahn, J.S.& Llobera, J.R.(Eds), The anthropology of pre-capitalist societies. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hau‘ofa, E. (1993). Our sea of islands. In Naidu, V.Waddell, E.& Hau‘ofa, E. (Eds), A new Oceania: Rediscovering our sea of islands. Suva: School of Social and Economic Development, USP.Google Scholar
Hayden, C. (2003). When nature goes public: The making and unmaking of bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Heller, C. (2001). McDonalds, MTV, and Monsanto: Resisting biotechnology in the age of informational capital. In Tokar, B. (Ed.), Redesigning life? The worldwide challenge to genetic engineering, 405–419. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Helmreich, S. (2003). Trees and seas of information: Alien kinship and the biopolitics of gene transfer in marine biology and biotechnology. American Ethnologist, 30, 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmreich, S. (2005a). How scientists think, about ‘natives’, for example: A problem of taxonomy among biologists of alien species in Hawaii. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 11, 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmreich, S. (2005b). El espacio de la ciencia, del genoma humano al océano, trans. A. Alvarez. Ciencias: Revista de difusión de la facultad de ciencias de la UNAM, 78, 18–24.Google Scholar
Helmreich, S. (forthcoming). Alien ocean: An anthropology of marine biology. Berkeley: U California Press.Google Scholar
Hilgartner, S.(2004). Mapping systems and moral order: Constituting property in genome laboratories. In Jasanoff, S. (Ed.), States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order, 131–141. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W.C., & Mauborgne, R.(2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82, 76–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Kuo, W.(2005). Japan and Taiwan in the wake of Bio-globalization: Drugs, race, and standards. Doctoral Dissertation, Program in History, Anthropology, Science, Technology and Society, MIT.Google Scholar
Landecker, H. (2005). Living differently in time: Plasticity, temporality and cellular biotechnologies. Culture Machine, 7, URL (accessed June 2007):http://culturemachine.tees.ac.uk/frm_f1.htmGoogle Scholar
Law, J. (2003). And if the global were small and non-coherent? Method, complexity and the baroque. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, URL (accessed June 2007): www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law-And-if-the-Global-Were-Small.pdfGoogle Scholar
MarBEC (2003). Marine Bioproducts Engineering Center year four annual report. University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1978 [1857–58]). The Grundrisse. Excerpted in Tucker, R.C.(Ed.) The Marx–Engels Reader, 2nd edn, 221–293. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Marx, K.(1976 [1867]). Capital, volume 1, trans. Fowkes, B.London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Maurer, B. (2000). A fish story: Rethinking globalization on Virgin Gorda, British Virgin Islands. American Ethnologist, 27, 670–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestel, R. (1999). Drugs from the sea. Discover, 20, 70–75.Google Scholar
Mills, E. (1989). Biological oceanography: An early history, 1870–1960. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP.Google Scholar
Mintz, S. (1985). Sweetness and power: The place of sugar in modern history. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Paxson, H. (2006). Artisanal cheese and economies of sentiment in New England. In Wilk, R. (Ed.), Fast food/slow food: The cultural economy of the global food system, 201–217. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.Google Scholar
Pottage, A.(2006). Too much ownership: Bio-prospecting in the age of synthetic biology. BioSocieties, 1, 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riles, A.(n.d.). Making white things white: An ethnography of legal knowledge. Cornell University.Google Scholar
Shreeve, J. (2004). Craig Venter’s epic voyage of discovery. WIRED, Aug., 104–113, 146–151.Google Scholar
Steinberg, P.E. (2001). The social construction of the ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
Stonich, S.C., & Bailey, C. (2000). Resisting the blue revolution. Human Organization, 59, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. (1992). Reproducing the future: Anthropology, kinship, and the new reproductive technologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sunder Rajan, K. (2006). Biocapital: The constitution of postgenomic life. Durham, NC: Duke UP.Google Scholar
Takahashi, P. (2003). Energy from the sea: The potential and realities of ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC). Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission Anton Bruun Memorial Lecture, 30 June, IOC Technical Series 66, UNESCO.Google Scholar
Taussig, M. (2004). My cocaine museum. Chicago: U Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thacker, E. (2005). The global genome: Biotechnology, politics, and culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. (2000). The biotech mode of reproduction. Paper presented at the School of American Research advanced seminar ‘Animation and cessation: Anthropological perspectives on changing definitions of life and death in the context of biomedicine’, Santa Fe, NM.Google Scholar
US Department of Commerce (1999). Turning to the sea: America’s ocean future.Google Scholar
Venter, J.C. (2004). Whole environment shotgun sequencing: The Sargasso Sea. Paper presented at ‘WAS … IS … MIGHT BE …: Perspectives on the evolution of the earth system’ conference, 8–9 March, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Venter, J.C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J.F., Halpern, A.L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J.A.et al. (2004). Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science, 304, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldby, C. (2000). The Visible Human Project: Informatic bodies and posthuman medicine. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagisako, S. (2002). Producing culture and capital: Family firms in Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.Google Scholar