Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Rota, Jadranka
Wagner, David L.
and
Tregenza, Tom
2006.
Predator Mimicry: Metalmark Moths Mimic Their Jumping Spider Predators.
PLoS ONE,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
e45.
Brakefield, Paul M
Pijpe, Jeroen
and
Zwaan, Bas J
2007.
Developmental plasticity and acclimation both contribute to adaptive responses to alternating seasons of plenty and of stress in Bicyclus butterflies.
Journal of Biosciences,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 3,
p.
465.
Rosenthal, Gil G.
2007.
Spatiotemporal Dimensions of Visual Signals in Animal Communication.
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
155.
Cuthill, Innes C.
2007.
Animal Behaviour: Strategic Signalling by Cephalopods.
Current Biology,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 24,
p.
R1059.
Vallin, Adrian
Jakobsson, Sven
and
Wiklund, Christer
2007.
“An eye for an eye?”—on the generality of the intimidating quality of eyespots in a butterfly and a hawkmoth.
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 9,
p.
1419.
Breuker, Casper J.
Gibbs, Melanie
Van Dyck, Hans
Brakefield, Paul M.
Klingenberg, Christian Peter
and
Van Dongen, Stefan
2007.
Integration of wings and their eyespots in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria.
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution,
Vol. 308B,
Issue. 4,
p.
454.
Stevens, Martin
2007.
Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
Vol. 274,
Issue. 1617,
p.
1457.
VLIEGER, LEON
and
BRAKEFIELD, PAUL M.
2007.
The deflection hypothesis: eyespots on the margins of butterfly wings do not influence predation by lizards.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,
Vol. 92,
Issue. 4,
p.
661.
Parchem, Ronald J
Perry, Michael W
and
Patel, Nipam H
2007.
Patterns on the insect wing.
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 4,
p.
300.
Maran, Timo
2007.
Semiotic interpretations of biological mimicry.
Semiotica,
Vol. 2007,
Issue. 167,
Stevens, Martin
Hopkins, Elinor
Hinde, William
Adcock, Amabel
Connolly, Yvonne
Troscianko, Tom
and
Cuthill, Innes C.
2007.
Field experiments on the effectiveness of ‘eyespots’ as predator deterrents.
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 74,
Issue. 5,
p.
1215.
Allen, Cerisse E.
2008.
The “Eyespot Module” and eyespots as modules: development, evolution, and integration of a complex phenotype.
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution,
Vol. 310B,
Issue. 2,
p.
179.
Price, Anna C.
Weadick, Cameron J.
Shim, Janet
and
Rodd, F. Helen
2008.
Pigments, Patterns, and Fish Behavior.
Zebrafish,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 4,
p.
297.
Kleisner, Karel
2008.
The Semantic Morphology of Adolf Portmann: A Starting Point for the Biosemiotics of Organic Form?.
Biosemiotics,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 2,
p.
207.
Minelli, Alessandro
2008.
Evolving Pathways.
p.
1.
Monteiro, Antónia
2008.
Alternative models for the evolution of eyespots and of serial homology on lepidopteran wings.
BioEssays,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 4,
p.
358.
Stevens, Martin
Stubbins, Claire L
and
Hardman, Chloe J
2008.
The anti-predator function of ‘eyespots’ on camouflaged and conspicuous prey.
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 11,
p.
1787.
Saenko, Suzanne V
French, Vernon
Brakefield, Paul M
and
Beldade, Patrícia
2008.
Conserved developmental processes and the formation of evolutionary novelties: examples from butterfly wings.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
Vol. 363,
Issue. 1496,
p.
1549.
Brakefield, Paul M.
2008.
Evolving Pathways.
p.
62.
Marcus, Jeffrey M.
and
Evans, Travis M.
2008.
A simulation study of mutations in the genetic regulatory hierarchy for butterfly eyespot focus determination.
Biosystems,
Vol. 93,
Issue. 3,
p.
250.