Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Grand, Tamara C.
and
Dill, Lawrence M.
1999.
The effect of group size on the foraging behaviour of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition?.
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 2,
p.
443.
Vásquez, Rodrigo A
and
Kacelnik, Alex
2000.
Foraging rate versus sociality in the starlingSturnus vulgaris.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
Vol. 267,
Issue. 1439,
p.
157.
Brown, Charles R.
and
Brown, Mary Bomberger
2000.
Heritable basis for choice of group size in a colonial bird.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 97,
Issue. 26,
p.
14825.
Blumstein, Daniel T.
Daniel, Janice C.
and
Evans, Christopher S.
2001.
Yellow‐Footed Rock‐Wallaby Group Size Effects Reflect A Trade‐Off.
Ethology,
Vol. 107,
Issue. 7,
p.
655.
Ebensperger, Luis A.
2001.
A review of the evolutionary causes of rodent group-living.
Acta Theriologica,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 2,
p.
115.
Brown, Charles R.
and
Brown, Mary Bomberger
2001.
Current Ornithology, Volume 16.
p.
1.
Dominguez, Jesús
2002.
Biotic and Abiotic Factors Affecting the Feeding Behavior of the Black-tailed Godwit.
Waterbirds,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 4,
p.
393.
Beauchamp, G
2002.
Little evidence for visual monitoring of vigilance in zebra finches.
Canadian Journal of Zoology,
Vol. 80,
Issue. 9,
p.
1634.
Öst, Markus
Mantila, Lili
and
Kilpi, Mikael
2002.
Shared care provides time-budgeting advantages for female eiders.
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 2,
p.
223.
Beauchamp, Guy
2003.
Group-size effects on vigilance: a search for mechanisms.
Behavioural Processes,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 3,
p.
111.
Blumstein, Daniel T.
Daniel, Janice C.
and
Sims, Rachel A.
2003.
GROUP SIZE BUT NOT DISTANCE TO COVER INFLUENCES AGILE WALLABY (MACROPUS AGILIS) TIME ALLOCATION.
Journal of Mammalogy,
Vol. 84,
Issue. 1,
p.
197.
PROCTOR, CAROLE J.
BROOM, MARK
and
RUXTON, GRAEME D.
2003.
A Communication-Based Spatial Model of Antipredator Vigilance.
Journal of Theoretical Biology,
Vol. 220,
Issue. 1,
p.
123.
Spieler, Marko
2003.
Risk of predation affects aggregation size: a study with tadpoles of Phrynomantis microps (Anura: Microhylidae).
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 1,
p.
179.
Fernández-Juricic, Esteban
Erichsen, Jonathan T.
and
Kacelnik, Alex
2004.
Visual perception and social foraging in birds.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
25.
Bednekoff, Peter A.
and
Lima, Steven L.
2004.
Risk allocation and competition in foraging groups: reversed effects of competition if group size varies under risk of predation.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
Vol. 271,
Issue. 1547,
p.
1491.
Vahl, Wouter K.
van der Meer, Jaap
Weissing, Franz J.
van Dullemen, Diederik
and
Piersma, Theunis
2005.
The mechanisms of interference competition: two experiments on foraging waders.
Behavioral Ecology,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 5,
p.
845.
Bednekoff, Peter A.
and
Lima, Steven L.
2005.
Testing for peripheral vigilance: do birds value what they see when not overtly vigilant?.
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 69,
Issue. 5,
p.
1165.
Beauchamp, Guy
and
Fernández-Juricic, Esteban
2005.
The group-size paradox: effects of learning and patch departure rules.
Behavioral Ecology,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
352.
Randler, Christoph
2005.
Coots Fulica atra reduce their vigilance under increased competition.
Behavioural Processes,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 2,
p.
173.
Cameron, Elissa Z.
and
du Toit, Johan T.
2005.
Social influences on vigilance behaviour in giraffes, Giraffa camelopardalis.
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 69,
Issue. 6,
p.
1337.