Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:45:56.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using clausal embedding to identify language impairment in sequential bilinguals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2018

MAUREEN SCHEIDNES  and
LAURICE TULLER
MAUREEN SCHEIDNES*
Affiliation:
Imagerie et cerveau Inserm 930, Université François Rabelais de Tours
LAURICE TULLER
Affiliation:
Imagerie et cerveau Inserm 930, Université François Rabelais de Tours
*
Address for correspondence: Maureen Scheidnes, Department of Linguistics, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, A1B 3X9, Canada. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assessing language in sequential bilinguals (L2 children) for the identification of language impairment suffers from lack of appropriate standardized tools and from limited understanding of the developmental trajectories of these learners. This longitudinal study compares L2 children to children with SLI in order to better understand where these groups have overlapping performance and where they differ. An analysis of standardized test scores as well as frequency of clausal embedding and morphosyntactic errors in spontaneous speech was conducted with 22 English-speaking children (aged 6;9-12;7) acquiring French as an L2 in France and 19 monolingual French-speaking children with SLI (aged 6;5–12;11). The results revealed that L2 children used clausal embedding more often than the children with SLI, but both groups had similar rates of morphosyntactic accuracy. Facility with clausal embedding from early stages of development and continuing difficulty with morphosyntactic accuracy are argued to be characteristic of typical development in L2 children.

Keywords

sequential bilingual childrenlanguage impairmentspontaneous languageclausal embeddingmorphosyntactic accuracy
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , November 2019 , pp. 949 - 967
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to sincerely thank the children, families, and schools for their participation in this research. We also thank Philippe Prévost, Sandrine Ferré, Christophe dos Santos, Cécile Monjauze, Rasha Zebib, Hélène Delage, Eléonore Morin, Chloé Berruer, Claire Damourette, Mélanie Aillet, Aline Vanhaverbeke, Lucile Dupuy, Servane Galès, Sabrina Delord, Sarah Black, Nohad Abou Melhelm, and Nolwen Brunie for their help in the data collection and analysis. This research was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Project ANR-08-BLAN-0328-01 for Complexity and compensation in atypical language acquisition: A comparative approach). Maureen Scheidnes is now at Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Supplementary material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000949

References

Armon-Lotem, S. (2012). Introduction: Bilingual children with SLI – the nature of the problem. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 1–4.Google Scholar
Bedore, L. M., & Peña, E. D. (2008). Assessment of bilingual children for identification of language impairment: Current findings and implications for practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11, 1–29.Google Scholar
Belletti, A., & Hamann, C. (2004). On the L2/bilingual acquisition of French by two young children with different source languages. In Prévost, P. & Paradis, J. (eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts, pp. 147–174. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Chevrie-Muller, C., Simon, A. M., & Decante, P. (1980). Epreuves pour l'examen de langage. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
De Agostini, M., Metz-Lutz, M. N., van Hout, A., Chavance, M., Deloche, G., & Pavao-Martins, I. (1998). Oral language evaluation battery of aphasic children (ELOLA): A French standardization (4-12 years). Revue de Neuropsychologie, 3, 319–368.Google Scholar
Del Re, A. C. (2013). compute.es: compute effect sizes [R Package]. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/compute.esGoogle Scholar
Deltour, J. J., & Hupkens, D. (1980). Test de vocabulaire actif et passif (t.v.a.p.). Château, Braîne le, Belgium: Editions Applications des Techniques Modernes.Google Scholar
Dollaghan, C. A., & Horner, E. A. (2011). Bilingual language assessment: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 54, 1077–1088.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). British picture vocabulary scale. London, UK: GL Assessment.Google Scholar
Field, A. P., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Gavruseva, E., & Lardiere, D. (1996). The emergence of extended phrase structure in child L2 acquisition. In Stringfellow, A., Cahana-Amitay, D., Hughes, E., & Zukowski, A. (eds.), BUCLD 20 Proceedings, pp. 225–236. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Golberg, H., Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2008). Lexical acquisition over time in minority first language children learning English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 41–65.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., & Kreiter, J. (2003). Understanding child bilingual acquisition using parent and teacher reports. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 267–288.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., & Simon-Cereijido, G. (2009). Using language sampling in clinical assessments with bilingual children: Challenges and future directions. Seminars in Speech and Language, 30, 234–245.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., & Simon-Cereijido, G. (2010). Using nonword repetition tasks for the identification of language impairment in Spanish-English-speaking children: Does the language of assessment matter? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 48–58.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., Simon-Cereijido, G., & Wagner, C. (2008). Bilingual children with language impairment: A comparison with monolinguals and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 3–19.Google Scholar
Hamann, C., & Tuller, L. (2014). Genuine versus superficial relatives in French: The depth of embedding factor. Rivista Di Grammatica Generativa: Research in Generative Grammar (RGG), 36, 47sear.Google Scholar
Haznedar, B. (2003). The status of functional categories in child second language acquisition: Evidence from the acquisition of CP. Second Language Research, 19, 1–41.Google Scholar
Kapantzoglou, M., Restrepo, M. A., & Thompson, M. S. (2012). Dynamic assessment of word learning skills: Identifying language impairment in bilingual children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43, 81–96.Google Scholar
Khomsi, A. (2001). Evaluation du langage oral. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar
Khomsi, A., Khomsi, J., Pasquet, F., & Parbeau-Gueno, A. (2007). Bilan informatisé de langage oral au cycle III et au collège (BILO3C). Paris: Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar
Khomsi, A., & Nanty, I. (2001). Evaluation des compétences langagières au collège (ECL-C). Paris: ECPA.Google Scholar
Kohnert, K. J. (2010). Bilingual children with primary language impairment: Issues, evidence and implications for clinical actions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 456–473.Google Scholar
Kohnert, K., Windsor, J., & Ebert, K. D. (2009). Primary or “specific” language impairment and children learning a second language. Brain and Language, 109, 101–111.Google Scholar
Lakshmanan, U., & Selinker, L. (1994). The status of CP and the tensed complementizer that in the developing L2 grammars of English. Second Language Research, 10, 25–48.Google Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using R. Florence, Kentucky: Taylor & Francis Group. Retrieved from http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/9780805861853/guide-to-R.aspGoogle Scholar
Lee, L. L. (1971). Northwestern syntax screening test (NSST). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Macswan, J. (2000). The architecture of the bilingual language faculty: Evidence from intrasentential code-switching. Bilingualism; Cambridge, 3 (1), 37–54.Google Scholar
Marinellie, S. A. (2004). Complex syntax used by school-age children with specific language impairment (SLI) in child-adult conversation. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 517–533.Google Scholar
Marinis, T., & Armon-Lotem, S. (2015). Sentence repetition. In Armon-Lotem, S., de Jong, J., & Meir, N. (eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Marinis, T., Armon-Lotem, S., & Pontikas, G. (2017). Language impairment in bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7, 265–276.Google Scholar
Owen, A. J., & Leonard, L. B. (2006). The production of finite and nonfinite complement clauses by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 548–571.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2004). The relevance of specific language impairment in understanding the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 67–82.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 213–237.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2000). Tense and temporality: A comparison between children learning a second language and children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: 43, 834–847.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2004). Comparing L2 and SLI grammars in child French: Focus on DP. In Prévost, P. & Paradis, J. (eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories, pp. 89–107. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., Emmerzael, K., & Duncan, T. S. (2010). Assessment of English language learners: Using parent report on first language development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 474–497.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., Genesee, F., & Crago, M. (2011). Dual language development and disorders: A handbook on bilingualism and second language learning (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Plante, E., & Vance, R. (1994). Selection of preschool language tests: A data-base approach. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 25, 15–24.Google Scholar
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven's coloured matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar
Reed, V. A. (2005). Adolescents with language impairment. In Reed, V. A. (eds.), An introduction to children with language disorders, pp. 168–219. Boston, MA: Pearson Press.Google Scholar
Reilly, J., Losh, M., Bellugi, U., & Wulfeck, B. (2004). “Frog, where are you?” Narratives in children with specific language impairment, early focal brain injury, and Williams syndrome. Brain and Language, 88, 229–247.Google Scholar
Restrepo, M. A. (1998). Identifiers of predominantly Spanish-speaking children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1398– 1411.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. (2012). Minimalism and bilingualism: How and why bilingualism could benefit children with SLI. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 88–101.Google Scholar
Scheidnes, M. (2015). Gender marking strategies in L2 children and monolingual children with SLI. In Hamann, C. & Ruigendijk, E. (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of Gala 2013 (pp. 416–428). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Scheidnes, M., & Tuller, L. (2016). Assessing successive bilinguals in two languages: A longitudinal look at English-speaking children in France. Journal of Communication Disorders, 64, 45–61.Google Scholar
Scott, C. (2003). Language as a variety: An analysis of clausal connectivity in spoken and written language of children with language learning disabilities. Oral communication presented at the SRCLD. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Semel, E., Wiig, E., & Secord, W. (2006). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF4- UK) (Fourth UK). London: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Simon-Cereijido, G., & Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F. (2007). Spontaneous language markers of Spanish language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 317–339.Google Scholar
Stevens, G. (2006). The age-length-onset problem in research on second language acquisition among immigrants. Language Learning, 56, 671–692.Google Scholar
Thordardottir, E. (2015). Proposed diagnostic procedures for use in bilingual and cross-linguistic contexts. In Armon-Lotem, S., Jong, J. de, & Meir, N. (eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment, pp. 329–358. Bristol, UK: Multilingual MattersGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, E., & Brandeker, M. (2013). The effect of bilingual exposure versus language impairment on nonword repetition and sentence imitation scores. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 1–16.Google Scholar
Thordardottir, E., & Juliusdottir, A. G. (2013). Icelandic as a second language: A longitudinal study of language knowledge and processing by school-age children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16, 411–435.Google Scholar
Tuller, L., Hamann, C., Chilla, S. Ferré, S., Morin, E., Prevost, P., dos Santos, C., Abed Ibrahim, L. & Zebib, R. (2018). Identifying language impairment in bilingual children in France and in Germany, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53, 888–904.Google Scholar
Tuller, L., Abboud, L., Ferré, S., Fleckstein, A., Prévost, P., dos Santos, C., Scheidnes, M., & Zebib, R. (2015). Specific language impairment and bilingualism: Assembling the pieces. In Hamann, C. & Ruigendijk, E. (eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2013.Google Scholar
Tuller, L., Henry, C., Sizaret, E., & Barthez, M.-A. (2012). Specific language impairment at adolescence: Avoiding complexity. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 161–184.Google Scholar
Wilcox, R. R. (2003). Applying contemporary statistical techniques. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Wilcox, R. R. (2005). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Inc.Google Scholar
Wilcox, R. R. (2010). Fundamentals of modern statistical methods: Substantially improving power and accuracy (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Wilcox, R. R., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2014). The WRS package for robust statistics in R (version 0.24). Retrieved from http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/wrs/Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Scheidnes and Tuller supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Scheidnes and Tuller supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 113.3 KB