Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:11:54.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theories and frameworks in second language processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2016

ANTON MALKO
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
LARA EHRENHOFER
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
COLIN PHILLIPS*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
*
Address for correspondence: Colin Phillips, University of Maryland - Linguistics, 1401 Marie Mount Hall, College Park, Maryland 20782, United States

Abstract

Analyzing L2 sentence processing in terms of cue-based memory retrieval is promising. But this useful general framework has yet to become a specific theory of L1-L2 differences.

Type
Peer Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25 (4), 657689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C. (2013). Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69 (2), 85103.Google Scholar
Kush, D., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). Relation-sensitive retrieval: evidence from bound variable pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 82, 1840.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive science, 29 (3), 375419.Google Scholar
McElree, B. (2006). Accessing recent events. Psychology of learning and motivation, 46, 155200.Google Scholar
Pan, H. Y., Schimke, S., & Felser, C. (2015). Referential context effects in non-native relative clause ambiguity resolution. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19 (3), 298313.Google Scholar
Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61 (2), 206237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar