Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:21:15.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural priming within and across languages: a corpus-based perspective*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2016

STEFAN TH. GRIES  and
GERRIT JAN KOOTSTRA
STEFAN TH. GRIES*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
GERRIT JAN KOOTSTRA
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle
*
Address for correspondence: Stefan Th. Gries, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3100, United States of America[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Structural priming is the phenomenon that speakers tend to re-use structures they have recently comprehended or produced themselves. Most studies on this topic are experimental and looked at within-language priming. However, there are now also many observational studies, a development that is inextricably related to new/larger corpora, new statistical methodologies, and new theoretical ideas. Second, there is a growing body of research on cross-linguistic structural priming, though mostly experimental. These developments lead to a new potential research avenue: cross-linguistic priming on the basis of observational data. Here, we will first summarize some fundamental studies of cross-linguistic priming, and then trace the historical development of observational studies of structural priming to showcase how statistical and theoretical developments have shaped research on priming in general and discuss what such observational priming research has offered to within-language priming research. We end with a discussion of how this research can inform cross-linguistic priming.

Keywords

structural primingcross-linguisticcorpus-basedlanguage productionregression modeling
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 20 , Special Issue 2: Cross-linguistic Priming in Bilinguals: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Language Processing, Acquisition and Change , March 2017 , pp. 235 - 250
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We wish to thank our reviewers and the editorial team for their feedback on previous versions of this paper; the usual disclaimers apply. Part of the writing of this article (by G.J. Kootstra) was supported by NSF grant OISE-0968369 to Judith Kroll, Janet van Hell, and Paola Dussias.f

References

Angermeyer, P. S. (2002). Lexical cohesion in multilingual conversation. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6, 361–393. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13670069020060040101.Google Scholar
Attneave, F. (1959). Applications of Information Theory to psychology: A summary of basic concepts, methods and results. Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? Cognition, 114, 455–461. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.005.Google Scholar
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 931–949. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.931.Google ScholarPubMed
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2012). Effects of phonological feedback on the selection of syntax: Evidence from between-language syntactic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 503–516. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728911000162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104, 437–458. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.003.Google Scholar
Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–192. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, J. K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90035-i.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Liversedge, S. P., Stewart, A. J., & Urbach, T. P. (1995). Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 489–506. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02143163.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., & Baayen, R. H. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In: Bouma, G., Krämer, I., & Zwarts, J. (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation (pp. 69–94). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Broersma, M., & De Bot, K. (2006). Triggered codeswitching: A corpus-based evaluation of the original triggering hypothesis and a new alternative. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 1–13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728905002348.Google Scholar
Cai, Z., Pickering, M. J., Yan, H., & Branigan, H. P. (2011). Lexical and syntactic representations between closely related languages: Evidence from Cantonese-Mandarin bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 431–445. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.05.003.Google Scholar
Carter, D., Deuchar, M., Davies, P., & Parafita Couto, M. (2011). A systematic comparison of factors affecting the choice of matrix language in three bilingual communities. Journal of Language Contact, 4, 153–183. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187740911x592808.Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 217–230. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005101313330.Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, J. K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234–272. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.113.2.234.Google Scholar
Chen, B., Jia, Y., Wang, Z., Dunlap, S., & Shin, J-A. (2013). Is word-order similarity necessary for cross-linguistic structural priming? Second Language Research, 29, 375–389. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267658313491962.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Pickering, M. J., & Sorace, A. (2008). Alignment in second language dialogue. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 528–556. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960801920545.Google Scholar
Desmet, T., & Declercq, M. (2006). Cross-linguistic priming of syntactic hierarchical configuration information. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 610–632. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.007.Google Scholar
Doğruöz, A. S., & Gries, S. T. (2012). Spread of on-going changes in an immigrant language: Turkish in the Netherlands. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 10, 401–426. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/bct.59.07sez.Google Scholar
Dubey, A., Keller, F., & Sturt, P. (2008). A probabilistic corpus-based model of syntactic parallelism. Cognition, 109, 326–344. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.006.Google Scholar
Estival, D. (1985). Syntactic priming of the passive in English. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 5, 7–22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1985.5.1-2.7.Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, J. K. (2006). The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 1011–1029. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960600824609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleischer, Z., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2012). Shared information structure: Evidence from cross-linguistic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 568–579. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728911000551.Google Scholar
Flett, S. (2006). A comparison of syntactic representation and processing in first and second language production. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Flett, S., Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2013). Are non-native structural preferences affected by native language preferences? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 751–760. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728912000594.Google Scholar
Fricke, M., & Kootstra, G. J. (2016). Primed codeswitching in spontaneous bilingual dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 181–201. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58–93. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2512.Google Scholar
Gerard, J., Keller, F., & Palpanas, T. (2010). Corpus evidence for age effects on priming in child language. In: Ohlsson, S. & Catrambone, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1559–1564.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2003). Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of Particle Placement. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2005). Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 365–399. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-6139-3.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2011). Studying syntactic priming in corpora: Implications of different levels of granularity. In: Schönefeld, D. (ed.), Converging evidence: Methodological and theoretical issues for linguistic research (pp. 143–165). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hcp.33.10gri.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 97–129. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S. (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182–200. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.10gri.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S. (2009). Psycholinguistic and corpus-linguistic evidence for L2 constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 163–186. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.07gri.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingual: Life and Reality. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M., Indefrey, P., & Muysken, P. (2009). Research techniques for the study of code-switching. In: Bullock, B. E. & Toribio, A. J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-switching (pp. 21–39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511576331.003.Google Scholar
Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language technologies (pp. 1–8). Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1073336.1073357.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Bernolet, S. (2017). The development of shared syntax in second language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728915000164.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2008). Language integration in bilingual sentence production. Acta Psychologica, 128, 479–489. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.005.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, 409–414. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00693.x.Google Scholar
Healey, P. G., Purver, M., & Howes, C. (2014). Divergence in dialogue. PloS One, 9, e98598. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098598.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Shimpi, P. (2004). Syntactic priming in young children. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 182–195. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2010). Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 23–62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. (2008). Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: Surprisal and cumulativity. In: Love, B. C., McRae, K., & Sloutsky, V. M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society, 1061–1066.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, J. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127, 57–83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 359–383. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantola, L., & van Gompel, R. P. (2011). Between-and within-language priming is the same: Evidence for shared bilingual syntactic representations. Memory & Cognition, 39, 276–290. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0016-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempen, G. (1977). Conceptualizing and formulating in sentence production. In: Rosenberg, S. (ed.), Sentence production: Developments in research and theory (pp. 259–274). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J., & Doedens, W. J. (2016). How multiple sources of experience influence bilingual syntactic choice: Immediate and cumulative cross-language effects of structural priming, verb bias, and language dominance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 710–732. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728916000420.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J., van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2010). Syntactic alignment and shared word order in code-switched sentence production: Evidence from bilingual monologue and dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 210–231. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.006.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J., van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2012). Priming of code-switches in sentences: The role of lexical repetition, cognates, and language proficiency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 797–819. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728912000259.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale, 23, 30–87.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J., & Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78–106. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90005-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loebell, H., & Bock, J. K. (2003). Structural priming across languages. Linguistics, 41, 791–824. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0042.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, article 226. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226.Google Scholar
McDonough, K. (2006). Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers' production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 179–207. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0272263106060098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2011). Using priming methods in second language research. Taylor & Francis. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203880944.Google Scholar
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2011). Evidence for (shared) abstract structure underlying children's short and full passives. Cognition, 121, 268–274. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.07.003.Google Scholar
Moscoso del Prado, F. (2013). Delayed echoes: cross-speaker resonances in English, German, and Japanese dialogue. Paper presented at the colloquium of the Department of Linguistics, UCSB, 8 March 2013.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. (2013). Language contact outcomes as the result of bilingual optimization strategies. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 709–730. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728912000727.Google Scholar
Myslín, M., & Levy, R. (2015). Code-switching and predictability of meaning in discourse. Language, 91, 871–905. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitschke, S., Kidd, E., & Serratrice, L. (2010). First language transfer and long-term structural priming in comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 94–114. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960902872793.Google Scholar
Nitschke, S., Serratrice, L., & Kidd, E. (2014). The effect of linguistic nativeness on structural priming in comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 525–542. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.766355.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2592.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1999). Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 136–141. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01293-0.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427–459. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–190; discussion 190–226. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x04000056.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish Y TERMINO EN ESPAÑOL: Toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics, 18, 581–618. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling.1980.18.7-8.581.Google Scholar
Poplack, S., Zentz, L., & Dion, N. (2012). Phrase-final prepositions in Quebec French: An empirical study of contact, code-switching and resistance to convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 203–225. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728911000204.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C., & Lombardi, L. (1998). Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 265–282. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitter, D. (2008). Context effects in language production: Models of syntactic priming in dialogue corpora. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35, 587–637. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01165.x.Google Scholar
Reitter, D., Moore, J. D., & Keller, F. (2006). Priming of syntactic rules in task-oriented dialogue and spontaneous conversation. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci) (pp. 685–690). Vancouver, Canada: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Reitter, D., & Moore, J. D. (2014). Alignment and task success in spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 29–46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.008.Google Scholar
Rowland, C. F., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125, 49–63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.008.Google Scholar
Salamoura, A., & Williams, J. N. (2007). Processing verb argument structure across languages: Evidence for shared representations in the bilingual lexicon. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 627–660. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0142716407070348.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D., & Laberge, S. (1978). Statistical dependence among successive occurrences of a variable in discourse. In: Sankoff, D. & Laberge, S. (eds.), Linguistic variation: Methods and models (pp. 119–126). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: Lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science, 6, 557–567. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00312.Google Scholar
Schenkein, J. (1980). A taxonomy of repeating action sequences in natural conversation. In: Butterworth, B. (ed.), Language production, Vol. 1 (pp. 21–47). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 153–171. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.002.Google Scholar
Schütze, C. T. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, 5th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Shin, J. A., & Christianson, K. (2009). Syntactic processing in Korean–English bilingual production: Evidence from cross-linguistic structural priming. Cognition, 112, 175–180. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.011.Google Scholar
Shin, J. A., & Christianson, K. (2012). Structural priming and second language learning. Language Learning, 62, 931–964. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00657.x.Google Scholar
Snider, N. (2009). Similarity and structural priming. In: Taatgen, N. A. & van Rijn, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science, 815–820.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. (2005). Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1, 113–150. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.113.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. (2006). Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English. A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C.E. (In preparation). New Mexico Spanish-English Bilingual (NMSEB) corpus, National Science Foundation 1019112/1019122. http://nmcodeswitching.la.psu.edu/.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. E. (2011). Testing convergence via code-switching: Priming and the structure of variable subject expression. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 241–267. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367006910371025.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. E. (2013). Priming in code-switching what grammatical consequences. Paper presented at the conference ‘Cross-linguistic priming in bilinguals: perspectives and constraints’, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. E. (2016). Two languages, one effect: Structural priming in spontaneous code-switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 733–753. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728914000406.Google Scholar
Travis, C. E., Torres Cacoullos, R., & Kidd, E. (2017). Cross-language priming: A view from bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728915000127.Google Scholar
Weiner, E. J., & Labov, W. (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics, 19, 29–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700007441.Google Scholar