Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:05:28.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semantic competitor priming within and across languages: The interplay of vocabulary knowledge, learning experience and working memory capacity*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2011

LI HONG  and
BRIAN MACWHINNEY
LI HONG*
Affiliation:
Research Centre of Language, Cognition and Language Application, Chongqing University, PR China
BRIAN MACWHINNEY
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
*
Address for correspondence Li Hong, College of Foreign Languages, Chongqing University, Sha Ping Ba, Chongqing, 400044, PR China[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports three studies of bilingual lexical processing, using the semantic competitor priming (SCP) method of Lee and Williams (2001). Study 1 found a trend of within-language SCP effect for Chinese–English bilinguals with both higher and lower levels of vocabulary knowledge. There was also a cross-language SCP effect, but this was restricted to bilinguals with a lower level of vocabulary knowledge. Study 2 found a cross-language SCP effect for Chinese learners of English in the classroom context. Study 3 found both within- and cross-language SCP effects for bilinguals with study-abroad experience as well as Chinese–English classroom learners who had a higher working memory capacity. Those findings are interpreted in terms of a dynamic view of bilingual language selection.

Keywords

semantic competitor primingL2 vocabulary knowledgelearning experienceworking memory capacity
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 433 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by State Scholarship Fund, PR China, the Key Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of Chongqing Education Commission (07SK159) and Research Fund of Research Centre of Language, Cognition and Language Application, Chongqing University. We thank Dr Zhang Fenghui and Miss Ding Jing for their assistance in data collection. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

References

Bialystok, E., & Craik, F. (2010). Structure and process in life-span cognitive development. In Overton, W. (ed.), Handbook of life-span development. Vol 1. Biology, cognition, and methods across the life-span, pp. 36–55. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Botvinick, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2006). Short-term memory for serial order: A recurrent neural network model. Psychological Review, 113, 201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contemporary Chinese Dictionary (5th edition, 2005). Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1996). Individual differences in working memory capacity: More evidence for a general capacity theory. Memory, 6, 577–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., La Heij, W. & Navarrete, E. (2006). The dynamics of bilingual lexical access. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual's two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 65–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., de Bot, K., & Schreuder, R. (1998). Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychology Review, 99, 122–149.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F. & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of memory and Language, 33, 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 33–51.Google Scholar
Lee, M.-W., & Williams, J. N. (2001) Lexical access in spoken word production by bilinguals: Evidence from the semantic competitor priming paradigm. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. (2003). The effects of L2 vocabulary knowledge on L2 semantic processing. Modern Foreign Languages, 4, 386–393.Google Scholar
Li, H. (2004). Effects of working memory capacity on L2 semantic processing. Psychological Science, 27, 620–623.Google Scholar
Li, H. (2007) Semantic processing: The L2 lexical competence perspectives. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (in press). The logic of the Unified Model. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (eds.) (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (1987). The assessment of bilingual aphasia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Prior, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2010). A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 418–436.Google Scholar
The International Picture Naming Project at CRL-UCSD. <http://crl.ucsd.edu/~aszekely/ipnp/> (retrieved 22 March 2006).+(retrieved+22+March+2006).>Google Scholar
Tokowicz, N., Michael, E. B., & Kroll, J. F. (2004). The role of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeldon, L. R. & Monsell, S. (1994). Inhibition of spoken word production by priming a semantic competitor. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 332–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar