Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T01:29:48.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Priming of code-switches in sentences: The role of lexical repetition, cognates, and language proficiency – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

GERRIT JAN KOOTSTRA ,
JANET G. VAN HELL  and
TON DIJKSTRA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An error was made in the preparation of Figure 3 in the article by Kootstra et al., published online on January 4, 2012. The figure should not have presented odds ratios, but odds. The correct version of Figure 3 is given below. This new figure leads to the same interpretation as in the original article, so our conclusions remain the same.

Type
Corrigendum
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Computational Modeling of Bilingualism , April 2013 , pp. 476
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

An error was made in the preparation of Figure 3 in the article by Kootstra et al., published online on January 4, 2012. The figure should not have presented odds ratios, but odds. The correct version of Figure 3 is given below. This new figure leads to the same interpretation as in the original article, so our conclusions remain the same.

The authors apologize for this error.

Figure 3. Effects of lexical repetition and cognate status per proficiency group, expressed in terms of the odds that participants switched at the same position as in the prime sentence (versus at a different position than in the prime sentence).

References

Kootstra, G. J., van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T.Priming of code-switches in sentences: The role of lexical repetition, cognates, and language proficiency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, doi: 10.1017/S136672891100068X. Published by Cambridge University Press, January 4, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 3. Effects of lexical repetition and cognate status per proficiency group, expressed in terms of the odds that participants switched at the same position as in the prime sentence (versus at a different position than in the prime sentence).