Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:10:10.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perception of tones by bilingual infants learning non-tone languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2016

LIQUAN LIU  and
RENÉ KAGER
LIQUAN LIU*
Affiliation:
Utrecht Institute of Linguistics-OTS, Utrecht University School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University
RENÉ KAGER
Affiliation:
Utrecht Institute of Linguistics-OTS, Utrecht University
*
Address for correspondence: Liquan Liu, Western Sydney University, School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Locked Bag 1797, NSW2751, Sydney, Australia[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the ability of bilingual infants who were learning Dutch and another non-tone language to discriminate tonal contrasts. All infants from 5 to 18 months of age succeeded in discriminating a tonal contrast of Mandarin Chinese (Tone 1 versus Tone 4) and showed a U-shaped pattern when facing a less acoustically salient manipulated version (contracted) of the aforementioned contrast. Specifically, infants showed initial sensitivity to the contracted contrast during their early months, followed by a loss of sensitivity at the stage where tonal perceptual reorganization typically occurs, and a sensitivity rebound by the end of the first year after birth. Compared to a previous studying of ours testing monolingual Dutch infants (Liu & Kager, 2014), the discrimination patterns of bilingual infants revealed both similarities and differences. On one hand, as with monolinguals, non-tone-learning bilingual infants’ tonal perception presented plasticity influenced by contrast acoustic salience along the trajectory of perceptual reorganization; as well as a general U-shaped perceptual pattern when discriminating non-native tones. On the other hand, bilingual infants appeared to regain sensitivity to the contracted tonal contrast at an earlier age (11–12 months) in comparison with monolinguals infants (17–18 months). We provide several explanations, stemming from the simultaneous exposure to two languages, to account for the 6-month bilingual perceptual plasticity from linguistic and cognitive perspectives. The overall outcomes of the study offer insights into the infant perceptual reorganization and language development trajectory, expand on the differences between monolingual and bilingual language development, and broaden our understanding of the influence of bilingual exposure to the perception of non-native contrasts in infancy from linguistic and cognitive perspectives.

Keywords

bilingualisminfantspeech perceptionlexical toneperceptual rebound
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , May 2017 , pp. 561 - 575
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We dearly thank Andrés Vanegas, Ileana Grama, Leher Singh, Maxime Pagnoulle, Rafèu Sichel-Bazin, Wei Wang, the babylab group, the experimental phonology group and the multilingualism group members of Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University for their kind feedback. A special thank goes to Brendan Devers for his tremendous support on this paper. We sincerely thank Bilingualism: Language and Cognition anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on this paper. We owe our thanks to all the enthusiastic and supportive families that participated in our research. Part of the data was presented in Liu & Kager, 2013.

References

Albareda-Castellot, B., Pons, F., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2011). The acquisition of phonetic categories in bilingual infants: new data from an anticipatory eye movement paradigm. Developmental Science, 14, 395–401.Google Scholar
Baum, S., & Titone, D. (2014). Moving towards a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 857–894.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., LaFleur, R., & Silver-Isenstadt, J. (1995). Divergent developmental patterns for infants’ perception of two nonnative consonant contrasts. Infant Behavior and Development, 18 (3), 339–350.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. N. (1988). Examination of the perceptual reorganization for speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 345–360.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70, 636–644. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00046 Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2001). Metalinguistic aspects of bilingual processing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 169–181. DOI: 10.1017/S0267190501000101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, pp 3–11. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728908003477 Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05) [Computer program]. Retrieved May 1, 2009, from http://www.praat.org/ Google Scholar
Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (1997). Native-language recognition abilities in 4-month-old infants from monolingual and bilingual environments. Cognition, 65 (1), 33–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). Evidence of early language discrimination abilities in infants from bilingual environments. Infancy, 2 (1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2003). Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language-specific vowel contrast in the first year of life. Language and Speech, 46 (2-3), 217–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brito, N., & Barr, R. (2012). Influence of bilingualism on memory generalization during infancy. Developmental Science, 15 (6), 812–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brito, N., & Barr, R. (2014). Flexible memory retrieval in bilingual 6-month-old infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 56 (5), 1156–1163.Google Scholar
Burnham, D., Kasisopa, B., Reid, A., Luksaneeyanawin, S., Lacerda, F., Attina, V., Xu Rattanasone, N., Schwarz, I-C., & Webster, D. (2014). Universality and language-specific experience in the perception of lexical tone and pitch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 77, 571–591.Google Scholar
Burns, T. C., Yoshida, C. A., Hill, K., & Werker, J.F. (2007). The development of phonetic representation in bilingual and monolingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 455–474.Google Scholar
Byers-Heinlein, K., Burns, T. C., & Werker, J. F. (2010). The roots of bilingualism in newborns. Psychological Science, 21 (3), 343–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, S. M., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2008). Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11, 282–298. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00675.x Google Scholar
Chen, A., & Fikkert, P. (2007). Intonation of early two-word utterances in Dutch. In Trouvain, J. and Barry, W.J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Dudweiler: Pirrot. 315–320.Google Scholar
Curtin, S., Byers-Heinlein, K., & Werker, J. F. (2011). Bilingual beginnings as a lens for theory development: PRIMIR in focus. Journal of Phonetics, 39 (4), 492–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCasper, A. J., & Spence, M. J. (1986). Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns’ perception of speech sounds. Infant Behavior and Development, 9 (2), 133–150.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P., & Chen, A. (2011). The role of word-stress and intonation in word recognition in Dutch 14- and 24-month-olds. In Danis, N., Mesh, K., & Sung, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, (222-232), Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Frota, S., Butler, J., & Vigário, M. (2014). Infants' Perception of Intonation: Is It a Statement or a Question?. Infancy, 19 (2), 194–213.Google Scholar
Gandour, J., Wong, D., Hsieh, L., Weinzapfel, B., Lancker, D. V., & Hutchins, G. D. (2000). A crosslinguistic PET study of tone perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (1), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Sierra, A., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., Percaccio, C. R., Conboy, B. T., Romo, H., Klarman, L., Ortiz, S., & Kuhl, P. K. (2011). Bilingual language learning: An ERP study relating early brain responses to speech, language input, and later word production. Journal of Phonetics, 39 (4), 546–557.Google Scholar
Genesee, F. (2001). Bilingual first language acquisition: Exploring the limits of the language faculty. In McGroarty, M. (Ed.) 21st Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 153–168.Google Scholar
Gervain, J., & Werker, J. F. (2013). Prosody cues word order in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Nature Communications, 4, 1490. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2430 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graf Estes, K., & Hay, J. F. (2015). Flexibility in Bilingual Infants' Word Learning. Child development.Google Scholar
Guttentag, R. E., Haith, M. M., Goodman, G. S., & Hauch, J. (1984). Semantic processing of unattended words by bilinguals: A test of the input switch mechanism. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 178–188. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90126-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallé, P. A., Chang, Y-C., & Best, C. T. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32 (3), 395–421.Google Scholar
Harrison, P. (2000). Acquiring the phonology of lexical tone in infancy. Lingua, 110, 581–616.Google Scholar
Havy, M., Bouchon, C., & Nazzi, T. (2015). Phonetic processing when learning words The case of bilingual infants. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 0165025415570646.Google Scholar
Hay, J. F., Graf Estes, K., Wang, T., & Saffran, J. R. (2014). From flexibility to constraint: The contrastive use of lexical tone in early word learning. Child development.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A., & Fougeron, C. (2000). A phonological model of French intonation. In Botinis, A. (ed.) Intonation: Analysis, Modeling and Technology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 209–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E., Barkley, C., Bao, M., & Wayland, R. (2008). Thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of Thai, English and Mandarin Chinese: An event-related potentials training study. BMC Neuroscience, 9 (1), 53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovács, Á. M., & Mehler, J. (2009a). Flexible learning of multiple speech structures in bilingual infants. Science, 325 (5940), 611–612.Google Scholar
Kovács, Á. M., & Mehler, J. (2009b). Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (16), 6556–6560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishnan, A., Gandour, J. T., & Bidelman, G. M. (2010). The effects of tone language experience on pitch processing in the brain stem. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363 (1493), 979–1000.Google Scholar
Kuipers, J. R., & Thierry, G. (2012). Event-related potential correlates of language change detection in bilingual toddlers. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2 (1), 97–102.Google Scholar
Kuipers, J. R., & Thierry, G. (2013). ERP-pupil size correlations reveal how bilingualism enhances cognitive flexibility. Cortex, 49 (10), 2853–2860.Google Scholar
Liu, L. (2013). The Effect of Bilingualism on Infant Language Development: The Acquisition of Sounds and Words. Published Doctoral dissertation. Nederlands Graduate School of Linguistics, ISBN 78–94-6093-129-1.Google Scholar
Liu, L., & Kager, R. W. J. (2013). How bilingualism alters infants' tone perception during perceptual reorganization. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 231–240, Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Liu, L., & Kager, R. W. J. (2014). Perception of tones by infants learning a non-tone language. Cognition, 133 (2), 385–394.Google Scholar
Liu, L., & Kager, R. W. J. (2015a). Bilingualism changes infant VOT perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 38, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, L., & Kager, R. W. J. (2015b). Perception of a native vowel contrast by Dutch monolingual and bilingual infants —- a perceptual lead. International Journal of Bilingualism, doi: 10.1177/1367006914566082 Google Scholar
Liu, L., & Kager, R. W. J. (2015c). Understanding phonological acquisition through phonetic perception –the influence of exposure and acoustic salience. Phonological Studies, 18, 51–58.Google Scholar
Männel, C., & Friederici, A. D. (2009). Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21 (10), 1988–2006.Google Scholar
Mattock, K., & Burnham, D. (2006). Chinese and English Infants’ Tone Perception: Evidence for Perceptual Reorganization. Infancy, 10 (3), 24–265.Google Scholar
Mattock, K., Molnar, M., Polka, L., & Burnham, D. (2008). The developmental course of lexical tone perception in the first year of life. Cognition, 106, 1367–1381.Google Scholar
Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P. W., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J., & Amiel-Tison, C. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 144–178.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2001). The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: Early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars. In Cenoz, J. and Genesee, F. (Eds.), Trends in Bilingual Acquisition, 11–41. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Molnar, M., Gervain, J., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Within rhythm class native language discrimination abilities of Basque-Spanish monolingual and bilingual infants at 3.5 months of age. Infancy, 19 (3), 326–337.Google Scholar
Narayan, C. R., Werker, J. F., & Beddor, P. S. (2010). The interaction between acoustic salience and language experience in developmental speech perception: evidence from nasal place discrimination. Developmental Science, 13, 407–420.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1998a). Language discrimination by newborns: toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24 (3), 756–766.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T., Floccia, C., & Bertoncini, J. (1998). Discrimination of pitch contours by neonates. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 779–784.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T., Nelson, D. G., Jusczyk, P. W., & Jusczyk, A. M. (2000). Six-month-olds' detection of clauses embedded in continuous speech: Effects of prosodic well-formedness. Infancy, 1 (1), 123–147.Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E., & Genesee, F. (1997). Language development in preschool bilingual children. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 21, 258–270.Google Scholar
Pannekamp, A., Weber, C., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Prosodic processing at the sentence level in infants. Neuroreport, 17 (6), 675–678.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 1–25. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100014662 Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernández, S. C., & Oller, D. K. (1993). Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers: Comparison to monolingual norms. Language Learning, 43 (1), 93–120. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00174.x Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernández, S. C., Lewedge, V., & Oller, D. K. (1997). The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petitto, L. A., Berens, M. S., Kovelman, I., Dubins, M. H., Jasinska, K., & Shalinsky, M. (2012). The “Perceptual Wedge Hypothesis” as the basis for bilingual babies’ phonetic processing advantage: New insights from fNIRS brain imaging. Brain and language, 121 (2), 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polka, L., & Bohn, O. S. (1996). A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100 (1), 577–592.Google Scholar
Quam, C., & Swingley, D. (2010). Phonological knowledge guides 2-year-olds’ and adults’ interpretation of salient pitch contours in word learning. Journal of memory and language, 62 (2), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sansavini, A., Bertoncini, J., & Giovanelli, G. (1997). Newborns discriminate the rhythm of multisyllabic stressed words. Developmental Psychology, 33 (1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2010). Bilingual Language Acquisition: Where Does the Difference Lie?. Human Development. 53, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Albareda-Castellot, B., Weikum, W. M., & Werker, J. F. (2012). A bilingual advantage in visual language discrimination in infancy. Psychological Science, 23 (9), 994–999.Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: Is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental Science, 12 (6), 874–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Bosch, L., & Pons, F. (2008). Early bilingualism. Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development, 172–182.Google Scholar
Seidl, A., & Cristià, A. (2008). Developmental changes in the weighting of prosodic cues. Developmental Science, 11 (4), 596–606.Google Scholar
Singh, L., & Foong, J. (2012). Influences of Lexical Tone and Pitch on Word Recognition in Bilingual Infants. Cognition. 124 (2), 128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, L., Fu, C. S., Rahman, A. A., Hameed, W. B., Sanmugam, S., Agarwal, P., Jiang, B., Chong, Y., Meaney, M., & Rifkin-Graboi, A. (2014a). Back to Basics: A Bilingual Advantage in Infant Visual Habituation. Child development, 86 (1), 294–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, L., Hui, T. J., Chan, C., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2014b). Influences of vowel and tone variation on emergent word knowledge: a cross-linguistic investigation. Developmental science, 17 (1), 94–109.Google Scholar
Snow, D., & Balog, H. L. (2002). Do children produce the melody before the words? A review of developmental intonation research. Lingua, 112 (12), 1025–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Molnar, M. (2008). Development of coronal stop perception: Bilingual infants keep pace with their monolingual peers. Cognition, 108 (1), 232–242.Google Scholar
Sundara, M., & Scutellaro, A. (2011). Rhythmic distance between languages affects the development of speech perception in bilingual infants. Journal of Phonetics, 39 (4), 505–513.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (2015). Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (01), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanrell, M. M., Prieto, P., Astruc, L., Payne, E., & Post, B. (2010). Early acquisition of F0 alignment and scaling patterns in Catalan and Spanish. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, 100839, 1–4.Google Scholar
Veenker, T. J. G. (2007). [program]. http://www.beexy.org/.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2001). Dichotic perception of Mandarin tones by Chinese and American listeners. Brain and Language, 78 (3), 332–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. (2012). Perceptual Foundations of Bilingual Acquisition in Infancy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience, 1251, 50–61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06484.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Byers-Heinlein, K., & Fennell, C. T. (2009). Bilingual beginnings to learning words. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364 (1536), 3649–3663.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (2005). Speech Perception as a Window for Understanding Plasticity and Commitment in Language Systems of the Brain. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Developmental Psychobiology, 46, 233–251.Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Gandour, J., & Francis, A. (2006). Effects of language experience and stimulus complexity on categorical perception of pitch direction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120 (2), 1063–1074.Google Scholar
Yeung, H. H., Chen, K. H., & Werker, J. F. (2013). When does native language input reorganize phonetic perception? The precocious case of lexical tone. Journal of Memory and Language, 68 (2), 123–139.Google Scholar
Yip, M. (2002). Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar