Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T15:28:22.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lexical entrenchment and cross-language activation: Two sides of the same coin for bilingual reading across the adult lifespan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2017

VERONICA WHITFORD  and
DEBRA TITONE
VERONICA WHITFORD*
Affiliation:
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Graduate School of Education, Harvard University
DEBRA TITONE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Centre for Research on Brain, Language & Music, McGill University
*
Address for correspondence: Veronica Whitford, Ph.D. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences McGovern Institute for Brain ResearchMassachusetts Institute of Technology43 Vassar Street Cambridge Massachusetts 02139United States[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We used eye movement measures of paragraph reading to examine whether two consequences of bilingualism, namely, reduced lexical entrenchment (i.e., reduced lexical quality and accessibility arising from less absolute language experience) and cross-language activation (i.e., simultaneous co-activation of target- and non-target-language lexical representations) interact during word processing in bilingual younger and older adults. Specifically, we focused on the interaction between word frequency (a predictor of lexical entrenchment) and cross-language neighborhood density (a predictor of cross-language activation) during first- and second-language reading. Across both languages and both age groups, greater cross-language (and within-language) neighborhood density facilitated word processing, indexed by smaller word frequency effects. Moreover, word frequency effects and, to a lesser extent, cross-language neighborhood density effects were larger in older versus younger adults, potentially reflecting age-related changes in lexical accessibility and cognitive control. Thus, lexical entrenchment and cross-language activation multiplicatively influence bilingual word processing across the adult lifespan.

Keywords

readingeye movementslexical entrenchmentcross-language activationaging
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 58 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by the following grants to Debra Titone: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Award (#204609); Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Catalyst Grant in Aging (#232932); the Canada Research Chairs (CRC) Program; the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI); and the Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music (CRBLM). We also gratefully acknowledge additional support from a Fonds Québecois de recherche sur la nature et les technologies (FQRNT) masters scholarship and an NSERC doctoral scholarship awarded to Veronica Whitford. Special thanks go to Kirsty Coulter and Alissa Yip for their assistance with data collection.

References

Allen, P. A., Madden, D. J., Weber, T. A., & Groth, K. E. (1993). Influence of age and processing stage on visual word recognition. Psychology and Aging, 6, 261–271.Google Scholar
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802–814.Google Scholar
Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234–254.Google Scholar
Andrews, S. (1997). The effects of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 439–461.Google Scholar
Andrews, S., & Hersch, J. (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 299–318.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459.Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.Google Scholar
Bates, D. M. (2007). Linear mixed model implementation in lme4. Unpublished manuscript. University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Bates, D. M., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. R. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv:1506.04967.Google Scholar
Beauvillain, C. (1992). Orthographic and lexical constraints in bilingual word recognition. In Harris, R. J. (Ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals (pp. 221–235). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Craik, F. I. (2010). Cognitive and linguistic processing in the bilingual mind. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 19–23.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 859–873.Google Scholar
Bijeljac-Babic, R., Biardeau, A., & Grainger, J. (1997). Masked orthographic priming in bilingual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 447–457.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2011). Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension. Cognition, 118, 245–257.Google Scholar
Bopp, K. L., & Verhaeghen, P. (2005). Aging and verbal memory span: A meta-analysis. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 60, 223–233.Google Scholar
Bowles, N. L., & Poon, L. W. (1981). The effect of age on speed of lexical access. Experimental Aging Research, 7, 417–426.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Lagrou, E., & Stevens, M. (2016). Visual word recognition in a second language: A test of the lexical entrenchment hypothesis with lexical decision times. Bilingualism, 1, 1–19.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A., & Just, M. A. (1994). Working memory constraints in comprehension: Evidence from individual differences in aphasia, and aging. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed.)., Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1075–1122). New York:Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 857–871.Google Scholar
Clifton, C. Jr., Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements in reading words and sentences. In Van Gompel, R., Fisher, M., Murray, W., & Hill, R. L. (Eds.)., Eye movement research: A window on mind and brain (pp. 341–372). Oxford, England: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. F., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S.Dornic (Eds.), Attention & Performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cop, U., Keuleers, E., Drieghe, D., & Duyck, W. (2015). Frequency effects in monolingual and bilingual natural reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 225, 1216–1234.Google Scholar
Darowski, E. S., Helder, E., Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2008). Age-related differences in cognition: The role of distraction control. Neuropsychology, 22, 638–644.Google Scholar
Davis, C. J., Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1550–1570.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B. (2011). Language and cognition in bilinguals and multilinguals. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B., Borgwaldt, S., Bos, M., & van den Eijnden, E. (2002). Lexical decision and word naming in bilinguals: Language effects and task effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 91–124.Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Lemhöfer, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). The word frequency effect in first and second language word recognition: A lexical entrenchment account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 843–863.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. (Eds.), Localist Connectionist Approaches to Human Cognition (pp. 189–225). New York: Mahwah.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197.Google Scholar
Dirix, N., Cop, U., Drieghe, D., & Duyck, W. (in press). Cross-lingual neighborhood effects in generalized lexical decision and natural reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition.Google Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A., Marín, A., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Associative and orthographic neighborhood density effects in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology, 23, 759–764.Google Scholar
Duyck, W., Vanderelst, D., Desmet, T., & Hartsuiker, R.J. (2008). The frequency effect in second-language visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 850–855.Google Scholar
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.Google Scholar
Fozard, J. L., & Gordon-Salant, S. (2001). Changes in vision and hearing with aging. In Birren, J. E. & Schaie, K. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 241–266). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grossi, G., Savill, N., Thomas, E., & Thierry, G. (2012). Electrophysiological cross-language neighborhood density effects in late and early English-Welsh bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 408.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 787– 814.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 186–209.Google Scholar
Grady, C., Luk, G., Craik, F. I. M., & Bialystok, E. (2015). Brain network activity in monolingual and bilingual older adults. Neuropsychologia, 66, 170–181.Google Scholar
Grainger, J. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp.131–146). Elsevier: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Dijkstra, A. (1992). On the representation and use of language information in bilinguals. In Haris, R. J. (Ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals (pp. 207–220). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
Gregg, J., & Inhoff, A. W. (2016). Misperception of orthographic neighbors during silent and oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 799–820.Google Scholar
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 193–225). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In Gopher, D. & Koriat, A. (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII, Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653–675). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Inhoff, A.W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431–439.Google Scholar
Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 262–284.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Gullifer, J. W., & Zirnstein, M. (2016). Literacy in adulthood: Reading in two languages. In Montanari, S. & Nicoladis, E. (Eds.), Lifespan perspectives on bilingualism. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Kuperman, V., Drieghe, D., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 563–580.Google Scholar
Kuperman, V., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2013). Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 802–823.Google Scholar
Laubrock, J., Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2006). SWIFT explorations of age differences in eye movements during reading. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 872–884.Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H., Baayen, R. H., Grainger, J., & Zwisterlood, P. (2008). Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A megastudy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 34, 12–31.Google Scholar
Lauro, J., & Schwartz, A. I. (2017). Bilingual non-selective lexical access in sentence contexts: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 217–233.Google Scholar
Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movement recordings during L2 reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 381–390.Google Scholar
Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S., & Shook, A. (2012). CLEARPOND: Cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities. PloS one, 7, e4323Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, K. H., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Proficiency and Experience Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing, 50, 940–967.Google Scholar
McClelland, J., & Rumelhart, D. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.Google Scholar
McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., Jordan, T. R., & Paterson, K. B. (2014). Aging and the use of interword spaces during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 740–747.Google Scholar
McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., & Paterson, K. B. (2015). The effects of interword spacing on the eye movements of young and older readers. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 609–621.Google Scholar
Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., Van Heuven, W. J. B., & Grainger, J. (2008). An electrophysiological investigation of cross-language effects of orthographic neighborhood. Brain Research, 1246, 123–135.Google Scholar
Miellet, S., Sparrow, L., & Sereno, S.C. (2007). Word frequency and predictability effects in reading French: An evaluation of the E-Z Reader model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 762–769.Google Scholar
Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In Besner, D. & Humphreys, G. W. (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695–699.Google Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Use base de donnés lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE 3. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447–462.Google Scholar
Payne, B. R., Gao, X., Noh, S. R., Anderson, C. J., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2012). The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: Evidence for efficiency and reserve. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 19, 122–149.Google Scholar
Perea, M., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 767–779.Google Scholar
Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2000). The effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification tasks: A review. Psicológica, 21, 327–340.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In Verhoeven, L., Elbro, C., & Reitsma, P. (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K. (1999). The effects of “neighborhood size” in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1142–1158.Google Scholar
Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E.D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1–56.Google Scholar
Development Core Team, R. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 2.13.1). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Website: http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Radach, R., Huestegge, L., & Reilly, R. (2008). The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading. Psychological Research, 72, 675–688.Google Scholar
Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2013). Eye movements in reading: Some theoretical context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Special Issue on Serial and Parallel processing in Reading), 66, 429–452.Google Scholar
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.Google Scholar
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 720–730.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C.E. (2012). The psychology of reading. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448–465.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Yang, J., Castelhano, M. S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Eye movements of older and younger readers when reading disappearing text. Psychology and Aging, 26, 214–223.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Yang, J., Schuett, S., & Slattery, T. J. (2013). Eye movements of older and younger readers when reading unspaced text. Experimental Psychology, 60, 354–361.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Influence of processing speed on adult age differences in working memory. Acta Psychologica, 79, 155–170.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A., & Meinz, E. J. (1995). Aging, inhibition, working-memory, and speed. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 50, 297–306.Google Scholar
Sears, C. R., Campbell, C. R., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Is there a neighbor frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1040–1062.Google Scholar
Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood frequency and neighborhood size effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 876–900.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.Google Scholar
Slattery, T. J., (2009). Word misperception, the neighbor frequency effect, and the role of sentence context: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychol- ogy: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1969–1975.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., & Mintzer, M. (1993). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Memory & Cognition, 21, 247–266.Google Scholar
Sommers, M. S. (1996). The structural organization of the mental lexicon and its contribution to age-related changes in spoken word recognition. Psychology and Aging, 11, 333–341.Google Scholar
Sommers, M. S., & Danielson, S. M. (1999). Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: The interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. Psychology and Aging, 14, 458–472.Google Scholar
Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 15, 225–231.Google Scholar
Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Soederberg Miller, L. M., Gagne, D. D., & Hertzog, C. (2008). Self-regulated reading in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 23, 131–153.Google Scholar
Tainturier, M. J., Tremblay, M., & Lecours, A. R. (1989). Aging and the word frequency effect: A lexical decision investigation. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1197–1203.Google Scholar
Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I. (2011). Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1412–1431.Google Scholar
Titone, D., Whitford, V., Lijewska, A., & Itzhak, I. (2016). Bilingualism, executive control, and eye movement measures of reading: A selective review and reanalysis of bilingual vs. multilingual reading data. In Schwieter, J. (Ed.), Cognitive control and consequences in the multilingual mind (pp. 11–46). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2012). Bilingual word recognition in a sentence context. Frontiers in Psychology, 3.Google Scholar
Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458–483.Google Scholar
von der Malsburg, T., & Angele, B. (2017). False positives and other statistical errors in standard analyses of eye movements in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 119–133.Google Scholar
Warrington, K. L., White, S. J., & Paterson, K. B. (2016). Ageing and the misperception of words: Evidence from eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–10.Google Scholar
Whitford, V., Pivneva, I., & Titone, D. (2016). Eye movement methods to investigate bilingual reading. In Heredia, R. R., Altarriba, J., & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension research (pp. 183–211). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2012). Second language experience modulates first- and second-language word frequency effects: Evidence from eye movement measures of natural paragraph reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 73–80.Google Scholar
Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2014). The effects of reading comprehension and launch site on frequency-predictability interactions during paragraph reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1151–1165.Google Scholar
Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2015). Second-language experience modulates eye movements during first- and second-language sentence reading: Evidence from a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1118–1129.Google Scholar
Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2016). Eye movements and the perceptual span during first- and second-language sentence reading in bilingual older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31, 58–70.Google Scholar
Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2017). The effects of word frequency and word predictability during first- and second-language paragraph reading in bilingual older and younger adults Psychology and Aging, 32, 158–177.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Whitford and Titone supplementary material

Appendix

Download Whitford and Titone supplementary material(File)
File 73.1 KB