Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:01:07.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lexical and semantic connections in number words translation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2017

AMPARO HERRERA
AMPARO HERRERA*
Affiliation:
University of Murcia, Spain
*
Address for correspondence: Amparo Herrera, Departamento de Psicología Básica y Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study investigated the influence of lexical links and conceptual mediation in number word translation. In four experiments, a semantic blocking paradigm was used with numerical stimuli and stimuli from other non-number categories. The performance of Spanish L1–English L2 bilinguals was examined in backward and forward translation (Experiment 1 and 3), in naming Arabic digits and pictures (Experiment 2A) and in reading L1 and L2 words (Experiment 2B). The blocked context produced a facilitatory effect for numerical stimuli in the lower range. This result contrasts with the interference effect observed for stimuli from non-number categories in translation and naming tasks. These results are interpreted to mean that the translation of number words, particularly those in the lower range of the numeric sequence, takes place with a large influence of the lexical connections. It supports the suggestions that the influence of processing routes depends on the type of items.

Keywords

number wordstranslationsemantic blocking paradigm
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 177 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The work reported here was supported by the Programa de Generación de Conocimiento Científico de Excelencia de la Fundación Séneca- Agencia de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Región de Murcia (research project 08741/PHCS/08). I wish to thank Ana María Flores and Verónica Juárez for helping in testing participants. I wish to thank Pedro Macizo for his worthy comments about this work.

References

Altarriba, J., & Mathis, K. M. (1997) Conceptual and lexical development in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 550–568.Google Scholar
Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F.(2005). Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 667–669.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M. (1995). Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 434–452.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2010). Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after fifteen years of service? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 359–371.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucčera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990.Google Scholar
Chen, H.-C., & Leung, Y.-S. (1989). Patterns of lexical processing in a nonnative language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 316–325.Google Scholar
Cohen-Kadosh, R., & Walsh, V. (2009). Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: Abstract or not abstract?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 313–328.Google Scholar
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.Google Scholar
Cuetos, F., Glez–Nosti, M., Barbón, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. Psicológica, 32, 133–143.Google Scholar
Damian, M.F. (2004). Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words. Memory & Cognition, 32, 164.Google Scholar
Damian, M.F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81, 77–86.Google Scholar
de Brauwer, J., Duyck, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2008). The SNARC effect in the processing of second-language number words: Further evidence for strong lexico-semantic connections. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 444–458.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1001–1018.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B., Dannenburg, L., & van Hell, J. G. (1994). Forward and backward word translation by bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 600–629.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B., & Poot, R. (1997).Word translation at three levels of proficiency in a second language: The ubiquitous involvement of conceptual memory. Language Learning, 47, 215–264.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1–42.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626–641.Google Scholar
Duyck, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). What number translation studies can teach us about the lexico-semantic organisation in bilinguals. Psychologica Belgica, 42, 151–175.Google Scholar
Duyck, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Forward and backward number translation requires conceptual mediation in both balanced and unbalanced bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 889–906.Google Scholar
Duyck, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2008). Semantic access in number word translation: The role of cross-lingual lexical similarity. Experimental Psychology, 55, 102–112.Google Scholar
Duyck, W., Depestel, I., Fias, W., & Reynvoet, B. (2008). Cross-lingual numerical distance priming with second-language number words in native- to third-language number word translation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1281–1290.Google Scholar
Ferrand, L., & New, B. (2003). Semantic and associative priming in the mental lexicon. In Bonin, P. (Ed.), Mental Lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp.25–44). NY: Nova Science Publisher.Google Scholar
Ferré, P., Sánchez-Casas, R., & Guasch, M. (2006). Can a horse be a donkey? Semantic and form interference effects in translation recognition in early and late proficient and nonproficient Spanish-Catalan bilinguals. Language Learning, 56, 571–608.Google Scholar
Fias, W., Reynvoet, B., & Brysbaert, M. (2001). Are Arabic numerals processed as pictures in a Stroop interference task? Psychological Research, 65, 242–249Google Scholar
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43–74.Google Scholar
Gollan, T., Forster, K. L., & Frost, R. (1997). Translation priming with different scripts: Masked priming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew–English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 1122–1139.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149.Google Scholar
Herrera, A., & Macizo, P. (2011). Naming digits in a semantic blocking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 328–338.Google Scholar
Herrera, A., & Macizo, P. (2012). Semantic processing in the production of numerals across notations. Journal o Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 40–51.Google Scholar
Herrera, A., Macizo, P., & Semenza, C. (2008). The role of working memory in the association between number magnitude and space. Acta Psychologica, 128, 225–237.Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (1999). Testing processing explanations for the asymmetry in masked cross-language priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 59–75.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Curley, J. (1988). Lexical memory in novice bilinguals: The role of concepts in retrieving second language words. In Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., & Sykes, R. N. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (Vol. 2, pp. 389–395). London, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Tokowicz, N. (2005). Models of bilingual representation and processing. Looking back and to the future. In Kroll, J. F. and de Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, (p. 531–553). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Tokowicz, N. (2001). The development of conceptual representation for words in a second language. In Nicol, J. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 49–71). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., van Hell, J. G., Tokowicz, N., & Green, D. W. (2010). The revised hierarchical model: A critical review. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 373–381.Google Scholar
La Heij, W., Hooglander, A., Kerling, R., & van der Velden, E. (1996). Nonverbal context effects in forward and backward word translation: Evidence for concept mediation. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 648–665.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520.Google Scholar
Navarrete, E., Del Prato, P., & Mahon, B. Z. (2012) Factors determining semantic facilitation and interference in the cyclic naming paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 3:38.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114, 227–252.Google Scholar
Pérez, M. A., & Navalón, C. (2003). Normas españolas de 290 nuevos dibujos: Acuerdo en la denominación, concordancia de la imagen, familiaridad, complejidad visual y variabilidad de la imagen [Spanish norms for 290 new pictures: Agreement in naming, picture agreement, familiarity, visual complexity and picture variability]. Psicológica, 24, 215–241.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C., So, K.-F., Von Eckardt, B., & Feldman, L. B. (1984). Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and more proficient bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 23–38.Google Scholar
Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 274–278.Google Scholar
Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88–125.Google Scholar
Roelofs, A. (2006). Functional architecture of naming dice, digits, and number words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 78–111.Google Scholar
Sakaki, Y., Hakoda, Y., & Kaminska, Z. (2012). Translation processes in bilinguals: Role of inter-lingual distance and second language proficiency. Psychologia, 55, 208–225.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Casas, R. M., Davis, C. W., & García-Albea, J. E. (1992). Bilingual lexical processing: Exploring the cognate/non-cognate distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 293–310.Google Scholar
Santens, S., & Gevers, W. (2008). The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line. Cognition, 108, 263–270.Google Scholar
Sasanguie, D., Defever, E., van den Bussche, E., & Reynvoet, B. (2011). The reability of and the relation between non-symbolic numerical distance effects in comparison, same-different judgments and priming. Acta Psychologica, 136, 73–80.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide (Version 1.1). Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Sholl, A., Sakaranarayanan, A., & Kroll, J. F. (1995). Transfer between picture naming and translation: A test of asymmetries in bilingual memory. Psychological Science 6, 45–49.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.Google Scholar
Talamas, A., Kroll, J. F., & Dufour, R. (1999). From form to meaning: Stages in the acquisition of second language vocabulary. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2, 45–58.Google Scholar
van Dijck, J. P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations. Cognition, 119, 114–119.Google Scholar
van Dijck, J. P., Gevers, W., & Fias, W. (2009). Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task. Cognition, 113, 248–253.Google Scholar
van Hell, J. G., & de Groot, A. M. B. (1998). Conceptual representation in bilingual memory: Effects of concreteness and cognate status in word association. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 193–211.Google Scholar
van Hell, J. G., & de Groot, A. M. B. (2008). Sentence context modulates visual word recognition and translation in bilinguals. Acta Psychologica, 128, 431–451.Google Scholar
van Hell, J. G., & Kroll, J. F. (2013). Using electrophysiological measures to track the mapping of words to concepts in the bilingual brain. In Altarriba, J. and Isurin, L. (Eds.), Memory, Language, and Bilingualism. Theoretical and Applied Approaches (pp. 126–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1176–1190.Google Scholar
van Opstal, F., & Verguts, T. (2011). The origins of the numerical distance effect: The same-different task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 112–120.Google Scholar
van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., de Moor, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: Comparison and priming effects in numerical and non-numerical orders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 419–425.Google Scholar
Verguts, T., Fias, W., & Stevens, M. (2005). A model of exact small-number representation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 66–80.Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Lauer, M., Damian, F. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2002). Semantic and syntactic forces in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 46–58.Google Scholar
Wynn, W. (1992). Children's acquisition of the number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 220–251.Google Scholar