Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:38:48.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lexical access in the second year: a study of monolingual and bilingual vocabulary development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2017

STEPHANIE DEANDA ,
KRISTI HENDRICKSON ,
PASCAL ZESIGER ,
DIANE POULIN-DUBOIS  and
MARGARET FRIEND
STEPHANIE DEANDA
Affiliation:
San Diego State University & University of California, San Diego
KRISTI HENDRICKSON
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
PASCAL ZESIGER
Affiliation:
University of Geneva
DIANE POULIN-DUBOIS
Affiliation:
Concordia University
MARGARET FRIEND*
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
*
Address for correspondence: Margaret Friend, 6505 Alvarado Road, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92120[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is well established that vocabulary size is related to efficiency in auditory processing, such that children with larger vocabularies recognize words faster than children with smaller vocabularies. The present study evaluates whether this relation is specific to the language being assessed, or related to general language or cognitive processes. Speed of word processing was measured longitudinally in Spanish- and English-learning monolinguals and bilinguals at 16 and 22 months of age. Speed of processing in bilinguals was similar to monolinguals, suggesting that the number of languages to which children are exposed does not influence word recognition. Further, cross-language associations in bilinguals suggest that the dominant language supports processing in the non-dominant language. These cross-language associations are consistent with general language and cognitive efficiency accounts in which the relation between word processing and knowledge relies on experience within a language as well as on general and cognitive properties of language learning.

Keywords

lexical accessbilingualsvocabularytoddlers
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , March 2018 , pp. 314 - 327
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*This research was supported by NIH awards 5R01HD068458 and HD068458-02S1 to the senior author and 1F31HD081933 to the first author, and does not necessarily represent the views of the National Institutes of Health. We gratefully acknowledge all of the parents and children who have devoted their time to participate in this research.

References

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2007). Scope of practice in speech-language pathology [Scope of practice]. Available from www.asha.org/policy. http://www.asha.org/Practice/ethics/Cultural-and-Linguistic-Competence/ Google Scholar
Arias-Trejo, N., & Plunkett, K. (2009). Lexical–semantic priming effects during infancy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3633–3647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arias-Trejo, N., & Plunkett, K. (2013). What's in a link: Associative and taxonomic priming effects in the infant lexicon. Cognition, 128 (2), 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, T. M., & Plunkett, K. (2002). Phonological specificity in early words. Cognitive Development, 17, 1265–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballem, K. D., & Plunkett, K. (2005). Phonological specificity in children at 1; 2. Journal of Child Language, 32, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers-Heinlein, K. (2015). Methods for studying infant bilingualism. In Schwieter, J. W. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing. Cambridge: UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Core, C., Hoff, E., Rumiche, R., & Señor, M. (2013). Total and conceptual vocabulary in Spanish–English bilinguals from 22 to 30 months: implications for assessment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 1637–1649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtin, S., Byers-Heinlein, K., & Werker, J. F. (2011). Bilingual beginnings as a lens for theory development: PRIMIR in focus. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 492–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, P. S., & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAnda, S., Arias-Trejo, N., Poulin-Dubois, D., Zesiger, P., & Friend, M. (2016a). SES, Minimal L2 Exposure, and Early Word Comprehension: New Evidence from a Direct Assessment. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 19, 162–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAnda, S., Bosch, L., Poulin-Dubois, D., Zesiger, P., & Friend, M. (2016b). The Language Exposure Assessment Tool: Quantifying exposure for bilingual research in young infants and children. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAnda, S., Poulin-Dubois, D., Zesiger, P., & Friend, M. (2016c). Lexical processing and organization in bilingual first language acquisition: Guiding future research. Psychological Bulletin, 142 (6), 655–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebert, K. D., Kohnert, K., Pham, G., Disher, J. R., & Payesteh, B. (2014). Three treatments for bilingual children with primary language impairment: Examining cross-linguistic and cross-domain effects. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 172–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A., & Weisleder, A. (2013). SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science, 16, 234–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, A., Perfors, A., & Marchman, V. A. (2006). Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year. Developmental Psychology, 42, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., Pinto, J. P., Swingley, D., Weinbergy, A., & McRoberts, G. W. (1998). Rapid gains in speed of verbal processing by infants in the 2nd year. Psychological Science, 9, 228–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., Swingley, D., & Pinto, J. P. (2001). When half a word is enough: Infants can recognize spoken words using partial phonetic information. Child Development, 72, 1003–1015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. L., & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language. In Sekerina, I.A., Fernandez, E.M. & Clahsen, H. (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children'slanguage processing (pp. 97–135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenson, L., Marchman, V.A., Thal, D., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2006). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and technical manual. 2. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Friend, M., & Keplinger, M. (2003). An infant-based assessment of early lexicon acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 302–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friend, M., & Keplinger, M. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Computerized Comprehension Task (CCT): data from American English and Mexican Spanish infants. Journal of Child Language, 35, 77–98. doi: 10.1017/S0305000907008264 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friend, M., Schmitt, S.A., & Simpson, A. M. (2012). Evaluating the predictive validity of the Computerized Comprehension Task: Comprehension predicts production. Developmental Psychology, 48, 136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friend, M., & Zesiger, P. (2011). A systematic replication of the psychometric properties of the CCT in three languages: English, Spanish, and French. Enfance, 3, 329–344. doi: 10.4074/S0013754511003041 Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Fennema-Notestine, C., & Morris, S. K. (2005). Bilingualism affects picture naming but not picture classification. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1220–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, K., Mitsven, S., Poulin‐Dubois, D., Zesiger, P., & Friend, M. (2015). Looking and touching: What extant approaches reveal about the structure of early word knowledge. Developmental Science, 18, 723–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendrickson, K., & Friend, M. (2013). Quantifying the Relationship Between Infants' Haptic and Visual Response to Word-Object Pairings. Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. (Conference Proceeding) Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1996). The intermodal preferential looking paradigm: A Window onto emerging language comprehension. In McDaniel, D., & McKee, C. (Eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax. Language, speech, and communication (pp. 105–124).Google Scholar
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2007). Spoken word recognition by Latino children learning Spanish as their first language. Journal of Child Language, 34, 227–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children. Developmental Science, 11, F31–F39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivanova, I., & Costa, A. (2008). Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica, 127, 277–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Van Hell, J. G., Tokowicz, N., & Green, D. W. (2010). The Revised Hierarchical Model: A critical review and assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 841–849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legacy, J., Zesiger, P., Friend, M., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2015). Vocabulary size, translation equivalents, and efficiency in word recognition in very young bilinguals. Journal of Child Language, 1–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Legacy, J., Zesiger, P., Friend, M., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2016). Vocabulary size, and speed of word recognition in very young French-English bilinguals: a longitudinal study. Bilingualism, Language, & Cognition.Google Scholar
Lewis, K., Sandilos, L. E., Hammer, C. S., Sawyer, B. E., & Méndez, L. I. (2015). Relations Among the Home Language and Literacy Environment and Children's Language Abilities: A Study of Head Start Dual Language Learners and Their Mothers. Early Education and Development, 1–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science, 11, F9–F16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchman, V. A., Fernald, A., & Hurtado, N. (2010). How vocabulary size in two languages relates to efficiency in spoken word recognition by young Spanish–English bilinguals. Journal of Child Language, 37, 817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, B. Z., Fernandez, S. C., & Oller, D. K. (1993). Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers: Comparison to monolingual norms. Language Learning, 43, 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernandez, S. C., Lewedeg, V., & Oller, D. K. (1997). The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Place, S., & Hoff, E. (2011). Properties of dual language exposure that influence 2-year-olds'bilingual proficiency. Child Development, 82, 1834–1849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin-Dubois, D., Bialystok, E., Blaye, A., Polonia, A., & Yott, J. (2012). Lexical access and vocabulary development in very young bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17, 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransdell, S. E., & Fischler, I. (1987). Memory in a monolingual mode: When are bilinguals at a disadvantage? Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restrepo, M. A., & Kruth, K. (2000). Grammatical characteristics of a Spanish-English bilingual child with specific language impairment. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 21, 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RStudio Team (2015). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/.Google Scholar
Singh, L. (2014). One World, Two Languages: Cross‐Language Semantic Priming in Bilingual Toddlers. Child Development, 85, 755–766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Styles, S. J., & Plunkett, K. (2009). How do infants build a semantic system? Language and Cognition, 1, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, E. (2011). The relationship between bilingual exposure and vocabulary development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 426–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uccelli, P., & Páez, M. M. (2007). Narrative and vocabulary development of bilingual children from kindergarten to first grade: Developmental changes and associations among English and Spanish skills. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Language spoken at home, 2011 American Community Survey 1-year estimates. Retrieved from: http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_11_1YR_S1601&prodType=table.Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, M., Waterfall, H., Gámez, P. B., Gómez, L. E., Bowers, E., & Shimpi, P. (2010). Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 37, 1047–1064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Koss Torkildsen, J., Sannerud, T., Syversen, G., Thormodsen, R., Simonsen, H. G., Moen, I., Smith, L., & Lindgren, M. (2006). Semantic organization of basic-level words in 20-month-olds: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 19, 431–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willits, J. A., Wojcik, E. H., Seidenberg, M. S., & Saffran, J. R. (2013). Toddlers activate lexical semantic knowledge in the absence of visual referents: evidence from auditory priming. Infancy, 18, 1053–1075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yip, V., & Matthews, S. (2000). Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese–English bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zangl, R., Klarman, L., Thal, D., Fernald, A., & Bates, E. (2005). Dynamics of word comprehension in infancy: Developments in timing, accuracy, and resistance to acoustic degradation. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 179–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed