Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:08:01.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language-switch costs from comprehension to production might just be task-switch costs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2021

Chuchu Li Open the ORCID record for Chuchu Li [Opens in a new window]  and
Tamar H. Gollan
Chuchu Li*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, USA
Tamar H. Gollan
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Dr. Chuchu LiDepartment of PsychiatryUniversity of California, San Diego9500 Gilman DriveLa Jolla, CA 92093-0948, USA[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spanish–English bilinguals switched between naming pictures in one language and either reading-aloud or semantically classifying written words in both languages. When switching between reading-aloud and picture-naming, bilinguals exhibited no language switch costs in picture-naming even though they produced overt language switches in speech. However, when switching between semantic classification and picture-naming, bilinguals, especially unbalanced bilinguals, exhibited switch costs in the dominant language and switch facilitation in the nondominant language even though they never switched languages overtly. These results reveal language switching across comprehension and production can be cost-free when the intention remains the same. Assuming switch costs at least partially reflect inhibition of the nontarget language, this implies such language control mechanisms are recruited only under demanding task conditions, especially for unbalanced bilinguals. These results provide striking demonstration of adaptive control mechanisms and call into question previous claims that language switch costs necessarily transfer from comprehension to production.

Keywords

language switching from comprehension to productionadaptive controlinhibitionunivalent stimuli
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , May 2022 , pp. 459 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abutalebi, J, Della Rosa, PA, Green, DW, Hernandez, M, Scifo, P, Keim, R, Cappa, SF and Costa, A (2012) Bilingualism tunes the anterior cingulate cortex for conflict monitoring. Cerebral cortex 22(9), 2076–2086. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr287CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arrington, CM, Altmann, EM and Carr, TH (2003) Tasks of a feather flock together: Similarity effects in task switching. Memory, & Cognition 31(5), 781–789. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barr, DJ, Levy, R, Scheepers, C and Tily, HJ (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E, Andonova, E, D'Amico, S, Jacobsen, T, Kohnert, K, Lu, C-C., Székely, A, Wicha, N, Federmeier, K, Herron, D, Iyer, G, Pechmann, T, Devescovi, A, Orozco-Figueroa, A, Gutierrez, G, Hung, D, Hsu, J, Tzeng, O, Gerdjikova, G, Mehotcheva, T and Pleh, C (2000) Introducing the CRL International Picture-Naming Project (CRL-IPNP). Center for Research in Language Newsletter, 12(1). La Jolla: University of California San Diego.Google Scholar
Bates, D, Maechler, M, Bolker, B, Walker, S, Christensen, RHB, Singmann, H, Dai, B and Grothendieck, G (2015) lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using “Eigen” and S4 (1.1-8) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Blanco-Elorrieta, E and Pylkkänen, L (2017) Bilingual language switching in the lab vs. in the wild: The spatio-temporal dynamics of adaptive language control. Journal of Neuroscience, 0553–17. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0553-17.2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M and New, B (2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41(4), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuetos, F, Glez-Nosti, M, Barbón, A and Brysbaert, M (2011) SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. Psicológica 32(2), 133–143.Google Scholar
De Baene, W, Duyck, W, Brass, M and Carreiras, M (2015) Brain circuit for cognitive control is shared by task and language switching. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 27(9), 1752–1765. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00817CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Bruin, A, Roelofs, A, Dijkstra, T and FitzPatrick, I (2014) Domain-general inhibition areas of the brain are involved in language switching: FMRI evidence from trilingual speakers. NeuroImage 90, 348–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Bruin, A, Samuel, AG and Duñabeitia, JA (2018) Voluntary language switching: When and why do bilinguals switch between their languages? Journal of Memory and Language 103, 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, M, Kleinman, D and Gollan, TH (2020) Which bilinguals reverse language dominance and why? Cognition 204, 104384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, M, Koch, I, Duñabeitia, JA, Grainger, J and Stephan, DN (2019) What absent switch costs and mixing costs during bilingual language comprehension can tell us about language control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 45(6), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000627Google ScholarPubMed
Declerck, M and Philipp, AM (2015a) The unusual suspect: Influence of phonological overlap on language control*. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(4), 726–736. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, M and Philipp, AM (2015b) A review of control processes and their locus in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin, & Review 22(6), 1630–1645. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0836-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degani, T, Kreiner, H, Ataria, H and Khateeb, F (2020) The impact of brief exposure to the second language on native language production: Global or item specific? Applied Psycholinguistics 41(1), 153–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716419000444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fadlon, J, Li, C, Prior, A and Gollan, TH (2019) Using what's there: Bilinguals adaptively rely on orthographic and color cues to achieve language control. Cognition 191, 103990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Festman, J, Rodriguez-Fornells, A and Münte, TF (2010) Individual differences in control of language interference in late bilinguals are mainly related to general executive abilities. Behavioral and Brain Functions 6(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-6-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filippi, R, Karaminis, T and Thomas, MSC (2014) Language switching in bilingual production: Empirical data and computational modelling. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(02), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, M, Almeida, J, Janssen, N and Caramazza, A (2006) Lexical selection in bilingual speech production does not involve language suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32(5), 1075–1089. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1075Google Scholar
Gambi, C and Hartsuiker, RJ (2016) If you stay, it might be easier: Switch costs from comprehension to production in a joint switching task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 42(4), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldrick, M, Runnqvist, E and Costa, A (2014) Language switching makes pronunciation less nativelike. Psychological Science 25(4), 1031–1036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gollan, TH and Ferreira, VS (2009) Should I stay or should I switch? A cost–benefit analysis of voluntary language switching in young and aging bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35(3), 640–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014981Google ScholarPubMed
Gollan, TH, Schotter, ER, Gomez, J, Murillo, M and Rayner, K (2014) Multiple Levels of Bilingual Language Control: Evidence From Language Intrusions in Reading Aloud. Psychological Science 25(2), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613512661CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gollan, TH, Weissberger, GH, Runnqvist, E, Montoya, RI and Cera, CM (2012) Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: A Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish–English bilinguals*. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15(3), 594–615. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J, Midgley, K and Holcomb, PJ (2010) Chapter 14. Re-thinking the bilingual interactive-activation model from a developmental perspective (BIA-d). In Kail, M and Hickmann, M (Eds), Language Acquisition and Language Disorders (Vol. 52). John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.52.18graGoogle Scholar
Green, DW (1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1(02), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, DW and Abutalebi, J (2013) Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25(5), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, DW and Wei, L (2014) A control process model of code-switching. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29(4), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.882515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hervais-Adelman, AG, Moser-Mercer, B and Golestani, N (2011) Executive control of language in the bilingual brain: integrating the evidence from neuroimaging to neuropsychology. Frontiers in psychology 2, 234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00234CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinman, D and Gollan, TH (2016) Speaking two languages for the price of one: Bypassing language control mechanisms via accessibility-driven switches. Psychological Science 27(5), 700–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreiner, H and Degani, T (2015) Tip-of-the-tongue in a second language: The effects of brief first-language exposure and long-term use. Cognition 137, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C and Gollan, TH (2018) Cognates interfere with language selection but enhance monitoring in connected speech. Memory, & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0812-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, C and Gollan, TH (2021) What cognates reveal about default language selection in bilingual sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language 118, 104214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, C, Timmer, K, Jiao, L, Yuan, Y and Wang, R (2019) The influence of contextual faces on bilingual language control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72(9), 2313–2327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819836713CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meuter, RFI and Allport, A (1999) Bilingual Language Switching in Naming: Asymmetrical Costs of Language Selection. Journal of Memory and Language 40(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsell, S, Lavric, A, Strivens, A and Paul, E (2019) Can we prepare to attend to one of two simultaneous voices? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 45(7), 966–982. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000650Google ScholarPubMed
Olson, DJ (2013) Bilingual language switching and selection at the phonetic level: Asymmetrical transfer in VOT production. Journal of Phonetics 41(6), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pashler, H (1994) Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 116(2), 220–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peeters, D, Runnqvist, E, Bertrand, D and Grainger, J (2014) Asymmetrical switch costs in bilingual language production induced by reading words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40(1), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034060Google ScholarPubMed
Philipp, AM and Koch, I (2006) Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 18(4), 624–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440500423269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipp, AM and Koch, I (2010) The integration of task-set components into cognitive task representations. Psychologica Belgica 50(3–4), 338–411. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-50-3-4-383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2013) (n.d.). [Methodology Reference]. European Environment Agency. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/oxygen-consuming-substances-in-rivers/r-development-core-team-2006Google Scholar
Schneider, DW and Logan, GD (2006) Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin, & Review 13(1), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slevc, LR, Davey, NS and Linck, JA (2016) A new look at “the hard problem” of bilingual lexical access: Evidence for language-switch costs with univalent stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 28(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2016.1152274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasenko, A and Gollan, TH (2019) Tip of the tongue after any language: Reintroducing the notion of blocked retrieval. Cognition 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104027CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinhauser, M and Hübner, R (2006) Response-based strengthening in task shifting: Evidence from shift effects produced by errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32(3), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.517Google ScholarPubMed
Tomoschuk, B, Ferreira, VS and Gollan, TH (2019) When a seven is not a seven: Self-ratings of bilingual language proficiency differ between and within language populations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22(3), 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandierendonck, A, Christiaens, E and Liefooghe, B (2008) On the representation of task information in task switching: Evidence from task and dimension switching. Memory, & Cognition 36(7), 1248–1261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Heuven, WJB, Dijkstra, T and Grainger, J (1998) Orthographic Neighborhood Effects in Bilingual Word Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 39(3), 458–483. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissberger, GH, Gollan, TH, Bondi, MW, Clark, LR and Wierenga, CE (2015) Language and task switching in the bilingual brain: Bilinguals are staying, not switching, experts. Neuropsychologia 66, 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar