Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:47:58.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language research needs an “emotion revolution” and distributed models of the lexicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

CATHERINE L. CALDWELL-HARRIS
CATHERINE L. CALDWELL-HARRIS*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Boston University, 64 Cummington St., Boston MA 02215, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Pavlenko urges the community of language researchers to modify their conceptions of the mental lexicon, based on findings from bilingualism and emotions. She makes a compelling case. While reading her article, one can temporarily forget that in contemporary practice, emotion is not regarded as relevant to the theoretical question of the structure of the mental lexicon.

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , July 2008 , pp. 169 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation for situated action? Discourse Processes, 28, 61–68.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. & Beckwith, R. (1989). Talking with feeling: Integrating affective and linguistic expression in early language development. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Language, 18, 1001–1018.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (1989). Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: Is the melody the message? Child Development, 60, 1497–1510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkbeiner, M., Forster, K., Nicol, J. & Nakamura, K. (2004). The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 1–22.Google Scholar
Fox Keller, E. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, C. L. (1990). Connectionism and cognitive linguistics. Connection Science, 2, 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. L. (1998). Psycholinguistic studies of entrenchment. In Koenig, J. (ed.), Conceptual structures, language and discourse (vol. 2), pp. 55–70. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Harris, C. L. (2004). Bilingual speakers in the lab: Psychophysiological measures of emotional reactivity. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. L., Gleason, J. B. & Ayçiçeği, A. (2006). When is a first language more emotional? Psychophysiological evidence from bilingual speakers. In Pavlenko, A. (ed.), Bilingual minds: Emotional experience, expression, and representation, pp. 257–283. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. & Fodor, J. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Language, 39, 170–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1993). The child's path to spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lund, K. & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1989). Competition and lexical categorization. In Corrigan, R., Eckman, F. & Noonan, M. (eds.), Linguistic categorization. pp. 195–242. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Marian, V. & Neisser, U. (2000). Language-dependent recall of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 361–368.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Posner, M., Petersen, S., Fox, P. & Raichle, M. (1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science, 240, 1627–1631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schumann, J. H. (1997). The neurobiology of affect in language. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.Google Scholar
Solan, Z., Horn, D., Ruppin, E. & Edelman, S. (2005). Unsupervised learning of natural languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 11629–11634.Google Scholar
Toglia, M. P. & Battig, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1998). The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar