Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:48:26.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language impairments in the development of sign: Do they reside in a specific modality or are they modality-independent deficits?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2011

BENCIE WOLL  and
GARY MORGAN
BENCIE WOLL*
Affiliation:
Deafness Cognition and Language Research Centre, University College London
GARY MORGAN
Affiliation:
City University London, and Deafness Cognition and Language Research Centre, University College London
*
Address for correspondence: Bencie Woll, DCAL, 49 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PD[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various theories of developmental language impairments have sought to explain these impairments in modality-specific ways – for example, that the language deficits in SLI or Down syndrome arise from impairments in auditory processing. Studies of signers with language impairments, especially those who are bilingual in a spoken language as well as a sign language, provide a unique opportunity to contrast abilities across language in two modalities (cross-modal bilingualism). The aim of the article is to examine what developmental sign language impairments can tell us about the relationship between language impairments and modality. A series of individual and small group studies are presented here illustrating language impairments in sign language users and cross-modal bilinguals, comprising Landau-Kleffner syndrome, Williams syndrome, Down syndrome, Autism and SLI. We conclude by suggesting how studies of sign language impairments can assist researchers to explore how different language impairments originate from different parts of the cognitive, linguistic and perceptual systems.

Keywords

sign languagemodalitylanguage impairments
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 15 , Special Issue 1: Bilingual children with Specific Language Impairment , January 2012 , pp. 75 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research of BW and GM was supported by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council of Great Britain (RES-620–28–6001): Deafness Cognition and Language Research Centre.

References

Anderson, D. S., & Reilly, J. S. (1998). The puzzle of negation: how children move from communicative to grammatical negation in ASL, Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. A., Woll, B., & Gathercole, S. (2002). The impact of developmental visuo-spatial learning difficulties on British Sign Language. Neurocase, 8, 424–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellugi, U., & Fischer, S. (1972). A comparison of sign language and spoken language. Cognition, 1, 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellugi, U., Marks, S., Bihrle, A., & Sabo, H. (1988). Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams syndrome. In Bishop, D. & Mogford, K. (eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances, pp. 177–189. London: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Benton, A. L., Hamsher, K., Varney, N. R., & Spreen, O. (1983). Contributions to neuropsychological assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). The Test for Reception of Grammar, version 2 (TROG-2). London: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
Brentari, D. (1998). A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C., Morford, J. P., & Mayberry, R. I. (2000) (eds.). Language acquisition by eye. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Elliot, C. D., Smith, P., & McCulloch, K. (1996). British Ability Scales II (BAS II). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. (2003) (ed.). Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., Nicoladis, E., & Paradis, J. (1995). Language differentiation in early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 22, 611–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herman, R., Grove, N., Holmes, S., Morgan, G., Sutherland, H., & Woll, B. (2004). Assessing BSL development: Production test (Narrative Skills). London: City University Publications.Google Scholar
Herman, R., Holmes, S., & Woll, B. (1999). Assessing British Sign Language development: Receptive Skills Test. Coleford: Forest Book Services.Google Scholar
Jarrold, C., Baddeley, A. D., & Hewes, A. K. (1999). Genetically dissociated components of working memory: Evidence from Down's and Williams syndromes. Neuropsychologia, 37, 637–651.Google Scholar
Kail, R. (1994). A method for studying the generalised slowing hypothesis in children with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 418–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1998). Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2 (10), 389–398.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2008). Research into Williams syndrome: the state of the art. In Nelson, C. A. & Luciana, M. (eds.), Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience, pp. 691–700. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia (PALPA). Andover: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kay-Raining Bird, E., Cleave, P., Trudeau, N., Thordadottir, E., & Sutton, A. (2005). The language abilities of bilingual children with Down syndrome. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 187–199.Google Scholar
Kirk, B., Kyle, J. G., Ackerman, J., & Woll, B. (1990). Measuring British Sign Language development in deaf school children. In Kyle, J. G. (ed.), Deafness and sign language into the 1990s, pp. 62–71. Bristol: Deaf Studies Trust.Google Scholar
Laws, G., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). A comparison of language abilities in adolescents with Down syndrome and children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 1324–1339.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. (2009). Cross-linguistic studies of child language disorders. In Schwartz, R. (ed.), Handbook of child language disorders, pp. 308–324. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
MacSweeney, M., Capek, C., Campbell, R., & Woll, B. (2009). The signing brain: The neurobiology of sign language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 232–240.Google Scholar
Mann, W., Marshall, C. R., Mason, K., & Morgan, G. (2010). The acquisition of sign language: The impact of phonetic complexity on phonology. Language Learning and Development, 6, 60–86.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. R., Denmark, T., & Morgan, G. (2006). Investigating the underlying causes of SLI: A non-sign repetition test in British Sign Language. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8 (4), 347–355.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. (2003). Speech and language: Research review for Foresight Cognitive Systems Project. www.foresight.gov.uk/Cognitive%20Systems/FS_CogA4_SpeechLang.pdf.Google Scholar
Mason, K., Rowley, K., Marshall, C. R., Atkinson, J. R., Herman, R., Woll, B., & Morgan, G. (2010). Identifying SLI in Deaf children acquiring British Sign Language: Implications for theory and practice. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 33–49.Google Scholar
Mayberry, R. I., & Eichen, J. (1991). The long-lasting advantages of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 486–512.Google Scholar
Mayberry, R. I., & Squires, B. (2006). Sign language acquisition. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn, vol. 11, pp. 291–295. Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQueen, J. M. (1998). Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, R. P. (2002). Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. In Meier, Richard P., Cormier, Kearsy & Quinto-Pozos, David (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, pp. 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. (2005). Biology and behaviour: Insights from the acquisition of sign language. In Cutler, A. (ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones, pp. 191–208. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Morgan, G., Barrière, I., & Woll, B. (2006). The influence of typology and modality on the acquisition of language. First Language, 26, 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G., Herman, R., Barrière, I., & Woll, B. (2008). The onset and mastery of spatial language in children acquiring British Sign Language. Cognitive Development, 23, 1–19.Google Scholar
Morgan, G., Herman, R., & Woll, B. (2007). Language impairments in sign language: Breakthroughs and puzzles. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, G., Smith, N., Tsimpli, I. M., & Woll, B. (2002). Language against the odds: the learning of BSL by a polyglot savant. Journal of Linguistics, 38, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G., Smith, N., Tsimpli, I. M., & Woll, B. (2007). Classifier learning and modality in a polyglot savant. Lingua, 117 (7), 1339–1353.Google Scholar
Morgan, G., & Woll, B. (eds.) (2002). Directions in sign language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G., & Woll, B. (2007). Understanding sign language classifiers through a polycomponential approach. Lingua, 117 (7), 1159–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, M. D. (1997). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (Revised). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Newport, E. L., & Meier, R. P. (1985). The acquisition of American Sign Language. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, pp. 881–938. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Orfanidou, E., Adam, R., Morgan, G., & McQueen, J. M. (2010). Segmentation in signed and spoken language: Different modalities, same segmentation procedures. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 272–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2007). Bilingual children with specific language impairment: Theoretical and applied issues. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 512–564.Google Scholar
Petitto, L. A., & Marentette, P. (1991). Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence for the ontogeny of language. Science, 251, 1483–1496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Schick, B. (1990). Classifier predicates in American Sign Language. International Journal of Sign Linguistics, 1, 15–40.Google Scholar
Schick, B., Marschark, M., & Spencer, P. (eds.) (2004). Advances in the sign language development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sieratzki, J. S., Calvert, G., Brammer, M., Campbell, R., David, A. S., & Woll, B. (2001). Accessibility of spoken, written, and sign language in Landau-Kleffner syndrome: a linguistic and functional MRI study. Epileptic Disorders, 3 (2), 79–89.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (ed.) (1985). The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 2: Theoretical issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smith, N., & Tsimpli, I.-M. (1995). The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, N., Tsimpli, I.-M., Morgan, G., & Woll, B. (2010). Signs of a savant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, J. T., Tellegen, P. J., & Laros, J. A. (1989). Snijders–Oomen Non-verbal Intelligence Test: Manual & Research Report. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174–215.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. F., Wong, A. M.-Y., Fletcher, P., & Leonard, L. B. (2006). Nonword repetition and sentence repetition as clinical markers of SLI: The case of Cantonese. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49 (2), 219–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supalla, T. (1986). The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Craig, C. (ed.), Noun classification and categorization, pp. 181–214. Amsterdam: John. Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R., & Woll, B. (1999). The linguistics of BSL: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, H., Plesa-Skwerer, D., Faja, S., & Joseph, R. M. (2003). People with Williams syndrome process faces holistically. Cognition, 89, 11–24.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. S. C., Dockrell, J. E., Messer, D., Parmigiani, C., Ansari, D., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2006). Speeded naming, frequency and the development of the lexicon in Williams Syndrome. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21 (6), 721–759.Google Scholar
Uecker, A., Mangan, P. A., Obrzut, J. E., & Nadel, L. (1993). Down syndrome in neurobiological perspective: An emphasis on spatial cognition. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 266–276.Google Scholar
Vallar, G., & Papagno, C. (1993). Preserved vocabulary acquisition in Down's syndrome: the role of phonological short-term memory. Cortex, 29, 467–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Bogaerde, B., & Baker, A. E. (2009). Code mixing in mother–child interaction in deaf families. In Baker, A. E. & Woll, B. (eds.), Sign language acquisition, pp. 153–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van der Lely, H. K. J. (2005). Domain-specific cognitive systems: Insight from grammatical specific language impairment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 53–59.Google Scholar
Volterra, V., Capirci, O., Pezzini, G., Sabbadini, L., & Vicari, S. (1996). Linguistic abilities in Italian children with Williams syndrome. Cortex, 32, 663–677.Google Scholar
Woll, B., & Grove, N. (1996). On language deficits and modality in children with Down syndrome: a case study of twins bilingual in BSL and English. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 271–278.Google Scholar
Woolfe, T., Herman, R., Roy, P., & Woll, B. (2010). Early lexical development in native signers: A BSL adaptation of the MacArthur-Bates CDI. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51 (3), 322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar