Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:32:09.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigations into the locus of language-switching costs in older adult bilinguals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2013

ARTURO E. HERNANDEZ*
Affiliation:
University of Houston
KATHRYN J. KOHNERT
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
*
Address for correspondence: Arturo E. Hernandez, Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. [email protected]

Abstract

Language switching was studied with older adult (age 65 years and older) and young adult (18–24 years) bilinguals in a blocked-language or mixed-language condition. Results revealed small differences in reaction time (RT) between older adults and college-age participants in the blocked condition. However, older adults showed much slower RTs in the mixed condition which involves sustained switching relative to young adults. In Experiment 2, the same design was used except that participants were asked to translate an auditory word. In this condition, older adults showed a slowing effect but to a much lesser degree. Furthermore, comparisons within the mixed condition (transient switching) revealed that switching costs varied across languages and age groups. The results from the picture-naming task are consistent with models that predict deficiencies in task-set shifting in older adults especially when a stimulus activates multiple responses. Furthermore, the results indicate interesting differences in sustained and transient switching depending on the task.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Support for this research was provided by the grants entitled “Cross-linguistic studies in aphasia” (NIH/NIDCD Grant #2-RO1-DC00216-11), “Aging and bilingualism” (NIH/NIA Grant # 5-R01-AG13474-03) and “Neural correlates of lexical processing in child L2 learners” (NIH/NICHD Grant #1-R21-HD059103-02). We would like to thank Armando Chavez, Eloisa Falcon and Eugenia Gurrola for their assistance in data collection, and Ronald Figueroa and Kain Sosa for technical support. Finally, we would like to thank Elizabeth Bates and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

References

Abbate, M. S. (1984). Pictures please: An articulation supplement. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.Google Scholar
Albinet, C. T., Boucard, G., Bouquet, C. A., & Audiffren, M. (2012). Processing speed and executive functions in cognitive aging: How to disentangle their mutual relationship? Brain and Cognition, 79, 111.Google Scholar
Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In Carlo Umilta, M. M. E. (ed.), Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (Attention and Performance Series), pp. 421452. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Botwinick, J., Brinley, J. F., & Robbin, J. S. (1958). Task alternation time in relation to problem difficulty and age. Journal of Gerontology, 13, 414417.Google Scholar
Brinley, J. F. (1965). Cognitive sets, speed and accuracy in performance in the elderly. In Welford, A. T. & Birren, J. E. (eds.), Behavior, aging and the nervous system, pp. 114149. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Zurif, E. B. (1974). Bilingual switching: The phonological level. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 28, 310318.Google Scholar
Chan, M.-C., Chau, H. L., & Hoosain, R. (1983). Input/Output Switch in bilingual code switching. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 407416.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25, 257271.Google Scholar
Daigneault, S., & Braun, C. M. (1993). Working memory and the Self-Ordered Pointing Task: Further evidence of early prefrontal decline in normal aging. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 881895.Google Scholar
Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Aamiry, A. (1969). Language and category clustering in bilingual free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 762768.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B., Dannenburg, L., & Van Hell, J. G. (1994). Forward and backward word translation. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 600629.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (1995). The development of bilingual memory: Evidence from word translation by trilinguals. Language Learning, 45, 683724.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., & Ferreira, V. S. (2009). Should I stay or should I switch? A cost/ìbenefit analysis of voluntary language switching in young and aging bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 640665.Google ScholarPubMed
Grainger, J., & Beauvillain, C. (1987). Language blocking and lexical access in bilinguals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 39, 295319.Google Scholar
Hahn, S., Andersen, G. J., & Kramer, A. F. (2004). Age influences on multi-dimensional set switching. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 11, 2536.Google Scholar
Heredia, R. R. (1997). Bilingual memory and hierarchical models: A case for language dominance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 3439.Google Scholar
Hernandez, A. E., & Kohnert, K. (1999). Aging and language switching in bilinguals. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 6, 6983.Google Scholar
Hsieh, S., & Allport, A. (1994). Shifting attention in a rapid visual search paradigm. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 79, 315335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 81, 582.Google Scholar
Jimura, K., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Age-related shifts in brain activity dynamics during task switching. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 14201431.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, PA: Lee & Febiger.Google Scholar
Kohnert, K., Bates, E., & Hernandez, A. E. (1999). Balancing bilinguals: Lexical-semantic production and cognititve processing in children learning Spanish and English. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 14001413.Google Scholar
Kohnert, K. J., Hernandez, A. E., & Bates, E. (1998). Bilingual performance on the Boston Naming Test: Preliminary norms in Spanish & English. Brain and Language, 65, 422440.Google Scholar
Kolers, P. A. (1966). Interlingual facilitation of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 314319.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & De Groot, A. M. B. (1997). Lexical and conceptual memory in the bilingual: Mapping form to meaning in two languages. In de Groot, A. M. B. & Kroll, J. F. (eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives, pp. 169199. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category inference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between biligual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149174.Google Scholar
Lavric, A., Mizon, G. A., & Monsell, S. (2008). Neurophysiological signature of effective anticipatory task-set control: A task-switching investigation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10161029.Google Scholar
Longman, C. S., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2013). More attention to attention? An eye-tracking investigation of selection of perceptual attributes during a task switch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 11421151.Google Scholar
MacNamara, J., Krauthammer, M., & Bolgar, M. (1968). Language switching in bilinguals as a function of stimulus and response uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 208215.Google Scholar
MacNamara, J., & Kushnir, S. (1971). Linguistic independence of bilinguals: The input switch. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 480487.Google Scholar
Meuter, R. F. I. (1993). Language-switching in naming tasks. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 2540.Google Scholar
Monsell, S., Matthews, G. H., & Miller, D. C. (1992). Repetition of lexicalization across languages: A further test of the locus of priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 44, 763783.Google Scholar
Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493516.Google Scholar
Olk, B., & Jin, Y. (2011). Effects of aging on switching the response direction of pro- and antisaccades. Experimental Brain Research, 208, 139150.Google Scholar
Panek, P. E., Barrett, G. V., Sterns, H. L., & Alexander, R. A. (1977). A review of age changes in perceptual information processing ability with regard to driving. Experimental Aging Research, 3, 387449.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F. (1994). The working memory function of the prefrontal cortices: Implications for developmental and individual differences in cognition. In Marshall, M. H., Janette, B. B., Roberts, R. J. Jr. & Pennington, B. (eds.), The development of future-oriented processes, pp. 243289. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207231.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A., Fristoe, N., McGuthry, K. E., & Hambrick, D. Z. (1998). Relation of task switching to speed, age, and fluid intelligence. Psychology and Aging, 13, 445461.Google Scholar
Schretlen, D., Pearlson, G. D., Anthony, J. C., Aylward, E. H., Augustine, A. M., Davis, A., & Patrick, B. (2000). Elucidating the contributions of processing speed, executive ability, and frontal lobe volume to normal age-related differences in fluid intelligence. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 5261.Google Scholar
Sholl, A., Sankaranarayanan, A., & Kroll, J. F. (1995). Transfer between picture naming and translation: A test of asymmetries in bilingual memory. Psychological Science, 6, 4549.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G. (1993). Translating versus picture naming: Similarities and differences. In Schreuder, R. & Weltens, B. (ed.), The bilingual lexicon (Studies in Bilingualism 6), pp. 83114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174215.Google Scholar
Soares, C., & Grosjean, F. (1984). Bilinguals in a monolingual and a bilingual speech mode: The effect on lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 12, 380386.Google Scholar
Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. The American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669679.Google Scholar
Terry, C. P., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2012). Aging and random task switching: The role of endogenous versus exogenous task selection. Experimental Aging Research, 38, 87109.Google Scholar
von Studnitz, R., & Green, D. (1997). Lexical decision and language switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1, 324.Google Scholar
Wasylyshyn, C., Verhaeghen, P., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2011). Aging and task switching: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 26, 1520.Google Scholar
Weissberger, G. H., Wierenga, C. E., Bondi, M. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2012). Partially overlapping mechanisms of language and task control in young and older bilinguals. Psychology and Aging, 12, 959974.Google Scholar
Wickens, C. D., Braune, R., & Stokes, A. (1987). Age differences in the speed and capacity of information processing: I. A dual-task approach. Psychology and Aging, 2, 7078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar