Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T14:31:25.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inter-lingual homograph letter detection in mixed language text: Persistent missing-letter effects and the effect of language switching*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

SETH N. GREENBERG  and
JEAN SAINT-AUBIN
SETH N. GREENBERG*
Affiliation:
Carleton College
JEAN SAINT-AUBIN
Affiliation:
Université de Moncton
*
Adress for correspondence: Seth Greenberg, Department of Psychology, Carleton College, Northfield, Minn. 55057, USA[email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Heretofore, we learned that bilinguals better detected letters in inter-lingual homographs when the context language ascribed a content role to the homograph as compared to a function role. In previous work the target homographs appeared in passages that were of a single language. The present work investigated whether this letter detection pattern would hold if both languages were activated by intermixing languages in a passage. Results suggested that despite intermixing of languages that would excite competing function and content meanings, local sentence context was sufficient to engender a content over function word advantage for inter-lingual homographs that was reminiscent of that obtained with homogenous text.

Type
Research Notes
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 111 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by a discovery grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and by a grant from the Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network (CLLRNet) to Jean Saint-Aubin. We thank Annie Roy-Charland and Mireille Babineau for their assistance in running bilingual subjects and preparing the materials, and Christina Linnerud for running the monolingual subjects.

References

Altarriba, J. & Gianico, J. L. 2003. Lexical ambiguity resolution across languages: A theoretical and empirical review. Experimental Psychology, 50, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amrhein, P. C. 1999. On the functional equivalence of monolinguals and bilinguals in “monolingual mode”: The bilingual anticipation effect in picture–word processing. Psychological Science, 10, 230–236.Google Scholar
Assink, E. M. H. & Knuijt, P. P. N. A. 2000. Reading development and attention to letters in words. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 347–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baudot, J. 1992. Fréquence d'utilisation des mots en français écrit contemporain [Frequency of usage of contemporary written French words]. Montréal: Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V. & Hanna, G. 1993. Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Chan, M. C., Chau, H. & Hoosain, R. 1983. Input/output switch in bilingual code switching. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M. 1980. Triggering and language processing. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 400–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalyrymple-Alford, E. C. 1967. Prestimulus language curing and speed of identifying Arab and English words. Psychological Reports, 21, 27–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalyrymple-Alford, E. C. 1985. Language switching during bilingual reading. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, (A.) T. 2005. Bilingual visual word recognition and lexical access. In Kroll & de Groot (eds.), pp. 349–370.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, A. (T.) & Van Heuven, W. J. B. 1998. The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. (eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition, pp. 189–225. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, A. (T.) & VanHeuven, W. J. B. Heuven, W. J. B. 2002. The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, A. (T.), Van Heuven, W. J. B. & Grainger, J. 1998. Simulating cross-language competition with the bilingual interactive activation model. Psychologica Belgica, 38, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drewnowski, A. 1981. Missing -ing in reading: Developmental changes in reading units. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 154–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, S. N., Healy, A. F., Koriat, A. & Kreiner, H. 2004. The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 428–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, S. N., Inhoff, A. W. & Weger, U. W. 2006. The impact of letter detection on eye movement patterns during reading: Reconsidering lexical analysis in connected text as a function of task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 987–995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, S. N. & Saint-Aubin, J. 2004. Letter detection for homographs with different meanings in different language texts. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. 1997. Processing mixed language: Issues, findings, and models. In Kroll & de Groot (eds.), pp. 349–370.Google Scholar
Healy, A. F. 1994. Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 333–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolers, P. A. 1966. Reading and talking bilingually. American Journal of Psychology, 79, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koriat, A. & Greenberg, S. N. 1991. Syntactic control of letter detection: Evidence from English and Hebrew nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 17, 1035–1050.Google Scholar
Koriat, A. & Greenberg, S. N. 1993. The prominence of leading functors in function morpheme sequences as evidenced by letter detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 19, 34–50.Google Scholar
Koriat, A., Greenberg, S. N. & Goldshmid, Y. 1991. The missing-letter effect in Hebrew: Word frequency or word function? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 17, 66–80.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. B. (eds.) 2005. Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kučera, H. & Francis, W. N. 1967. Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J., Krauthammer, M. & Bolgar, M. 1968. Language switching in bilinguals as a function of stimulus and response uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 208–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meuter, R. F. I. 2005. Language selection in bilinguals: Mechanisms and processes. In Kroll & de Groot (eds.), pp. 349–370.Google Scholar
Meuter, R. F. I. & Allport, A. 1999. Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs inlanguage selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, J. E. & Healy, A. F. 1995. Effect of meaning on letter detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 21, 82–95.Google Scholar
Muesseler, J., Koriat, A. & Nisslein, M. 2000. Letter-detection patterns in German: A window to the early extraction of sentential structure during reading. Memory & Cognition, 28, 993–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, J. H. 1977. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K. & Pollatsek, A. 1989. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.Google ScholarPubMed
Roy-Charland, A., Saint-Aubin, J., Klein, R. M. & Lawrence, M. 2007. Eye movements as direct tests of the GO model for the missing-letter effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 324–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saint-Aubin, J. & Klein, R. M. 2001. The influence of parafoveal processing on the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 318–334.Google ScholarPubMed
Saint-Aubin, J., Klein, R. M. & Landry, T. 2005. Age changes in the missing-letter effect revisited. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 158–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saint-Aubin, J., Klein, R. M. & Roy-Charland, A. 2003. Direct assessments of the processing time hypothesis for the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1191–1210.Google ScholarPubMed
Saint-Aubin, J. & Poirier, M. 1997. The influence of word function in the missing-letter effect: Further evidence from French. Memory and Cognition, 25, 666–676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, V. I. & Healy, A. F. 1993. Detecting phonemes and letters in text: Interactions between different types and levels of processes. Memory & Cognition, 21, 739–751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed