Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:14:12.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of L2 proficiency on speech movement variability: Production of prosodic contrasts by Bengali–English speakers*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2011

RAHUL CHAKRABORTY
RAHUL CHAKRABORTY*
Affiliation:
Texas State University – San Marcos
*
Address for correspondence: Department of Communication Disorders, 601 University Drive, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the influence of age of immersion and proficiency in a second language on speech movement consistency in both a first and a second language. Ten monolingual speakers of English and 20 Bengali–English bilinguals (10 with low L2 proficiency and 10 with high L2 proficiency) participated. Lip movement variability was assessed based on bilingual participants’ production of four real and four novel words embedded in Bengali (L1) and English (L2) sentences. Lip movement variability was evaluated across L1 and L2 contexts for the production of real and novel words with trochaic and iambic stress pattern. Adult bilinguals produced equally consistent speech movement patterns in their production of L1 and L2 targets. Overall, speakers’ L2 proficiency did not influence their movement variability. Unlike children, the speech motor systems of adult L2 speakers exhibit a lack of flexibility which could contribute to their increased difficulties in acquiring native-like pronunciation in L2.

Keywords

Bengalispatiotemporal variabilitybilingualismprosodyspeech motor control
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 489 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to Lisa Goffman, Janna Berlin, Stefanie Westover, Diana Gonzales and Adam Jacks for invaluable assistance with many phases of this work. I am also thankful to the reviewers for their insightful guidance. This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Deafness and other Communicative Disorders) grant DC04826.

References

Ackermann, H., Hertrich, I., & Scharf, G. (1995). Kinematic analysis of lower lip movements in ataxic dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1252–1259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, S. G., Weismer, G., & Kent, R. D. (1993). Speaking rate and speech movement velocity profiles. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.12) [computer program]. http://www.praat.org (retrieved August 4, 2009).Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008) HUPerceptual adaptation to non-native speechUH. Cognition, 106, 707–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakraborty, R., Goffman, L., & Smith, A. (2004, March). Physiological indices of bilingualism. Presented at the Conference on Motor Speech: Motor Speech Disorders & Speech Motor Control. Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, R., Goffman, L., & Smith, A. (2008). Physiological indices of bilingualism: Oral motor coordination and speech rate in Bengali–English speakers. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 51, 321–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatterji, S. K. (1921). Bengali phonetics. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 2, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dromey, C., & Benson, A. (2003). Effects of concurrent motor, linguistic, or cognitive tasks on speech motor performance. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 46, 1234–1246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E., & Nowaza, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M., & MacKay, I. (1995). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Liu, H. (1999). Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, W. N., & Kučera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goffman, L. (1999). Prosodic influences on speech production in children with specific language impairment and speech deficits: Kinematic, acoustic, and transcription evidence. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 42, 1499–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffman, L. (2004). Kinematic differentiation of prosodic categories in normal and disordered language development. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 47, 1088–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffman, L., Heisler, L., & Chakraborty, R. (2006). Mapping of prosodic structure onto words and phrases in children's and adults’ speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, L., & Malin, C. (1999). Metrical effects on speech movements in children and adults. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 42, 1003–1015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffman, L., & Smith, A. (1999). Development and phonetic differentiation of speech movement patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 649–660.Google ScholarPubMed
Guion, S. G. (2005). Knowledge of English word stress patterns in early and late Korean–English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 503–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Liu, S. H., & Yeni-Komshian, G. H. (2000a). Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21 (2), 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., & Loftin, J. D. (2000b). The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua–Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 28 (1), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammill, D. D., Brown, V. L., Larsen, S. C., & Weiderholt, J. L. (1994). Test of Adolescent and Adult Language Third Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc.Google Scholar
Hayes, B., & Lahiri, A. (1991). Bengali intonational phonology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 9, 47–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaiman, M. H. (1987). Bengali. In Comrie, B. (ed.), The world's major languages, pp. 490–513. London & Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Kleinow, J., & Smith, A. (2000). Kinematic correlates of speaking rate changes in stuttering and normally fluent adults. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 43, 521–536.Google Scholar
Levi, S., Winters, S., & Pisoni, D. (2007). Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 2327–2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maner, K., Smith, A., & Grayson, L. (2000). Influences of utterance length and complexity on speech motor performance in children and adults. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 43, 560–573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Major, R. C. (2001). Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second-language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathworks, Inc. (1993). Matlab: Higher performance numeric computation and visualization software [computer program]. Natick, MA.Google Scholar
Munro, M., & Derwing, T. (1995). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 389–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostry, D. J., Cooke, J. D., & Munhall, K. G. (1987). Velocity curves of human arms and speech movements. Experimental Brain Research, 68, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, L., & Wiltshire, C. (2000). Pitch accent in Indian-English teaching discourse. World Englishes, 19, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piske, T., Mackay, I., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadagopan, N., & Smith, A. (2004, March). Influence of utterance length and complexity on trajectory stability and phrase durations – age related changes. Poster presented at the Conference on Motor Speech: Motor Speech Disorders & Speech Motor Control. Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
Sereno, J. A. (1986). Stress pattern differentiation of form class in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, S36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., & Goffman, L. (1998). Stability and patterening of speech movement sequences in children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 18–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A., Goffman, L., Zelaznik, H., Ying, G., & McGillem, C. (1995). Spatiotemporal stability and pattering of speech movement sequences. Experimental Brain Research, 104, 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., Johnson, M., McGillem, C., & Goffman, L. (2000). On the assessment of stability and patterning of speech movements. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 43, 277–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A., & Zelaznik, H. (2004). The development of functional synergies for speech motor coordination in childhood and adolescence. Developmental Psychobiology, 45, 22–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southwood, M., & Flege, J. E. (1999). Scaling foreigh accent: Direct magnitude versus interval scaling. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 13, 335–349.Google Scholar
Tahta, S., Wood, M., & Loewenthal, K. (1981). Age changes in the ability to replicate foreign pronunciation and intonation. Language and Speech, 24, 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, B., & Smith, A. (2002). Articulatory movements in adolescents: Evidence for protracted development of speech motor control processes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1119–1133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber-Fox, C., & Neville, H. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber-Fox, C., & Neville, H. (2001). Sensitive periods differentiate processing of open- and closed-class words: An ERP study of bilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1138–1353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmermann, G. N. (1980). Articulatory dynamics of fluent utterances of stutterers and nonstutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed