Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:43:14.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crosslinguistic influence in the discovery of gender: the case of Greek–Dutch bilingual children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2017

EVELYN EGGER ,
AAFKE HULK  and
IANTHI MARIA TSIMPLI
EVELYN EGGER
Affiliation:
University of Reading
AAFKE HULK
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
IANTHI MARIA TSIMPLI*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
*
Address for correspondence: Professor Ianthi Maria Tsimpli, Dept. of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, 9 West Road, Cambridge, CB3 9DP[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the acquisition of grammatical gender in both languages of 21 simultaneous Greek–Dutch bilingual children living in the Netherlands. Greek and Dutch stand on the two opposite sides in terms of frequency and transparency of gender cues. Consequently, monolingual acquisition of gender in Greek is precocious with few overgeneralizations of the default value, neuter, in early stages. In contrast, monolingual acquisition of gender in Dutch is very late with errors in neuter nouns persisting up to the age of 7. Simultaneous Greek–Dutch bilingual children present an interesting test case of crosslinguistic influence in the form of acceleration (Greek affecting Dutch) or delay (Dutch affecting Greek). Children were tested on gender marking on determiners and adjectives in production and grammaticality judgment tasks. Input measures of Greek and Dutch and lexical skills were also considered. Results point to crosslinguistic influence in the form of acceleration of gender discovery in Dutch.

Keywords

gender discoverycrosslinguistic influencesimultaneous bilinguals
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 21 , Special Issue 4: Recent developments in child bilingualism: Cross-linguistic influence, incomplete acquisition, critical periods and the advantages of bilingualism , August 2018 , pp. 694 - 709
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*We thank Irini Toufexes and Athina Ntalli for helping with the data collection and the Greek School Athena in Amsterdam for their collaboration and support. Special thanks go to the participating children and their parents who made this research possible.

References

Audring, J. (2006). Pronominal gender in spoken Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 18, 85–116.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K. F., & Yang, S. (2010). Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 525–531.Google Scholar
Blom, E., Polišenská, D., & Unsworth, S. (2008a). The acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research, 24, 259–265.Google Scholar
Blom, E., Polišenská, D., & Weerman, F. (2008b). Articles, adjectives and age of onset: the acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender. Second Language Research, 24, 297–331.Google Scholar
Donaldson, B. C. (1981). Dutch reference grammar. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., & Schlichting, L. (2005). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III-NL. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pearson.Google Scholar
Eichler, N., Jansen, V., & Müller, N. (2013). Gender acquisition in bilingual children: French–German, Italian–German, Spanish–German and Italian–French. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17, 550–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, T. A., Peña, E. D., & Bedore, L. M. (2014). The relation between language experience and receptive-expressive semantic gaps in bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17, 90–110.Google Scholar
Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J., & van den Toorn, M. C. (1997). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Holton, D., Mackridge, P., & Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1997). Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hulk, A., & Cornips, L. (2010). The role of gender and count features in the acquisition of 'het' as a pronoun: similarities and differences with its acquisition as a determiner. In Costa, J., Castro, A., Lobo, M. & Pratas, F. (eds.), Language acquisition and development: proceedings of GALA 2009 (Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition), pp. 232–243. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A Functional Approach to Child Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2007). Determiners in bilingual German–Italian children: What they tell us about the relation between language influence and language dominance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 57–78.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2008). Dominance, mixing and cross-linguistic influence: On their relation in bilingual development. In Guijarro-Fuentes, P., Larrañaga, M. P. & Clibbens, J. (eds), First Language acquisition of morphology and syntax: Perspectives across languages and learners, pp. 209–234. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Müller, N., & Cantone, K. F. (2002). Gender in monolingual and bilingual first language acquisition: Comparing Italian and French. Lingue e Linguaggio, 1, 107–150.Google Scholar
Mastropavlou, M. (2006). The role of phonological salience and feature interpretability in the grammar of typically developing and language impaired children. Ph.D. dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Mastropavlou, M., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2011). The role of suffixes in grammatical gender assignment in Modern Greek: A psycholinguistic study. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 11, 27–55.Google Scholar
Müller, N., & Hulk, A. (2001). Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 1–21.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 1–25.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernández, S. C., Lewedeg, V., & Oller, K. (1997). The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 41–58.Google Scholar
Place, S., & Hoff, E. (2011). Properties of dual language exposure that influence 2-year-olds’ bilingual proficiency. Child Development, 82, 1834–1849.Google Scholar
Polišenská, D. (2010). Dutch Children's Acquisition of Verbal and Adjectival Inflection. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Ralli, A. (2002). The role of morphology in gender determination: evidence from Modern Greek. Linguistics, 40, 519–551.Google Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., & Tsimpli, I. (2000). Diagnostic verbal IQ test for school and preschool children: Standardization, statistical analysis, and psychometric properties. In Proceedings of the 8th conference of the panhellenic association of speech and language therapists, pp. 95–106. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.Google Scholar
Stephany, U., & Christofidou, A. (2008). The acquisition of Greek case, number, and gender: a usage based approach. Arbeitspapier 55, Neue Folge, University of Cologne: Institut für Linguistik, Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M. (2014). Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., & Hulk, A. (2013). Grammatical gender and the notion of default: Insights from language acquisition. Lingua, 137, 128–144.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2008). Age and input in the acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research, 24, 365–395.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2013). Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 86–110.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S., Argyri, F., Cornips, L., Hulk, A., Sorace, A., & Tsimpli, I. (2011). Bilingual acquisition of Greek voice morphology and Dutch gender: What do they have in common? In Danis, N., Mesh, K. & Sung, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 590–602. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S., Argyri, F., Cornips, L., Hulk, A., Sorace, A., & Tsimpli, I. (2014). The role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 765–805.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S., & Hulk, A. (2010). L1: acquisition of neuter gender in Dutch: production and judgment. In Costa, J., Castro, A., Lobo, M. & Pratas, F. (eds.), Language acquisition and development: proceedings of GALA 2009 (Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition), pp. 483–492. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S., Hulk, A., & Marinis, T. (2011). Internal and external factors in child second language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 207– 212.Google Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J. (1996). The psycholinguistics of grammatical gender: Studies in language comprehension and production. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Varlokosta, S. (2011). The role of morphology in grammatical gender assignment: A psycholinguistic study in Greek. In Galani, A., Hicks, G. & Tsoulas, G. (eds.), Morphology and its Interfaces, pp. 49–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vasić, N., Chondrogianni, V., Marinis, T., & Blom, E. (2012). Processing of gender in Turkish-Dutch and Turkish-Greek child L2 learners. In Biller, A. K., Chung, E. Y. & Kimball, A. E. (eds.) BUCLD 36: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, vol. 2, pp. 646–659. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Yip, V., & Matthews, S. (2000). Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese–English bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 193–208.Google Scholar